Societal AI Research Has Become Less Interdisciplinary

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2506.08738v2
• Date: Wed, 11 Jun 2025 09:42:30 GMT
• Title: Societal AI Research Has Become Less Interdisciplinary
• Authors: Dror Kris Markus, Fabrizio Gilardi, Daria Stetsenko,
• Abstract summary: This study analyzes over 100,000 AI-related papers published on ArXiv between 2014 and 2024.<n>Computer science-only teams now account for a growing share of the field's overall societal output.<n>These findings challenge common assumptions about the drivers of societal AI.
• Score: 3.9599054392856483
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: As artificial intelligence (AI) systems become deeply embedded in everyday life, calls to align AI development with ethical and societal values have intensified. Interdisciplinary collaboration is often championed as a key pathway for fostering such engagement. Yet it remains unclear whether interdisciplinary research teams are actually leading this shift in practice. This study analyzes over 100,000 AI-related papers published on ArXiv between 2014 and 2024 to examine how ethical values and societal concerns are integrated into technical AI research. We develop a classifier to identify societal content and measure the extent to which research papers express these considerations. We find a striking shift: while interdisciplinary teams remain more likely to produce societally-oriented research, computer science-only teams now account for a growing share of the field's overall societal output. These teams are increasingly integrating societal concerns into their papers and tackling a wide range of domains - from fairness and safety to healthcare and misinformation. These findings challenge common assumptions about the drivers of societal AI and raise important questions. First, what are the implications for emerging understandings of AI safety and governance if most societally-oriented research is being undertaken by exclusively technical teams? Second, for scholars in the social sciences and humanities: in a technical field increasingly responsive to societal demands, what distinctive perspectives can we still offer to help shape the future of AI?

Related papers

• Assessing Computer Science Student Attitudes Towards AI Ethics and Policy [8.927858368749204]
  The attitudes and competencies with respect to AI ethics and policy among post-secondary students studying computer science (CS) are of particular interest.<n>Despite computer scientists being at the forefront of learning about and using AI tools, their attitudes towards AI remain understudied.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-06T23:03:47Z)
• Navigating AI in Social Work and Beyond: A Multidisciplinary Review [0.0]
  This review aims to provide a comprehensive yet accessible overview, situating AI within broader societal and academic conversations as 2025 dawns. It briefly analyses AI's real-world impacts, ethical challenges, and implications for social work. It presents a vision for AI-facilitated simulations that could transform social work education through Advanced Personalised Simulation Training.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-25T05:51:23Z)
• Now, Later, and Lasting: Ten Priorities for AI Research, Policy, and Practice [63.20307830884542]
  Next several decades may well be a turning point for humanity, comparable to the industrial revolution. Launched a decade ago, the project is committed to a perpetual series of studies by multidisciplinary experts. We offer ten recommendations for action that collectively address both the short- and long-term potential impacts of AI technologies.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-06T22:18:31Z)
• AI for social science and social science of AI: A Survey [47.5235291525383]
  Recent advancements in artificial intelligence have sparked a rethinking of artificial general intelligence possibilities. The increasing human-like capabilities of AI are also attracting attention in social science research.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-01-22T10:57:09Z)
• Artificial intelligence in social science: A study based on bibliometrics analysis [0.0]
  This article presents the results of a bibliometric analysis of AI-related publications in the social sciences over the last ten years (2013-2022). More than 19,408 articles have been published, 85% from 2008 to 2022, showing that research in this field is increasing significantly year on year. The United States is the country that publishes the most (20%), followed by China (13%)
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-12-09T15:16:44Z)
• Human-Centered Responsible Artificial Intelligence: Current & Future Trends [76.94037394832931]
  In recent years, the CHI community has seen significant growth in research on Human-Centered Responsible Artificial Intelligence. All of this work is aimed at developing AI that benefits humanity while being grounded in human rights and ethics, and reducing the potential harms of AI. In this special interest group, we aim to bring together researchers from academia and industry interested in these topics to map current and future research trends.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-02-16T08:59:42Z)
• Metaethical Perspectives on 'Benchmarking' AI Ethics [81.65697003067841]
  Benchmarks are seen as the cornerstone for measuring technical progress in Artificial Intelligence (AI) research. An increasingly prominent research area in AI is ethics, which currently has no set of benchmarks nor commonly accepted way for measuring the 'ethicality' of an AI system. We argue that it makes more sense to talk about 'values' rather than 'ethics' when considering the possible actions of present and future AI systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-04-11T14:36:39Z)
• Building Bridges: Generative Artworks to Explore AI Ethics [56.058588908294446]
  In recent years, there has been an increased emphasis on understanding and mitigating adverse impacts of artificial intelligence (AI) technologies on society. A significant challenge in the design of ethical AI systems is that there are multiple stakeholders in the AI pipeline, each with their own set of constraints and interests. This position paper outlines some potential ways in which generative artworks can play this role by serving as accessible and powerful educational tools.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-06-25T22:31:55Z)
• The Short Anthropological Guide to the Study of Ethical AI [91.3755431537592]
  Short guide serves as both an introduction to AI ethics and social science and anthropological perspectives on the development of AI. Aims to provide those unfamiliar with the field with an insight into the societal impact of AI systems and how, in turn, these systems can lead us to rethink how our world operates.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-10-07T12:25:03Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.