"I Said Things I Needed to Hear Myself": Peer Support as an Emotional, Organisational, and Sociotechnical Practice in Singapore

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2506.09362v1
• Date: Wed, 11 Jun 2025 03:17:31 GMT
• Title: "I Said Things I Needed to Hear Myself": Peer Support as an Emotional, Organisational, and Sociotechnical Practice in Singapore
• Authors: Kellie Yu Hui Sim, Kenny Tsu Wei Choo,
• Abstract summary: This paper presents findings from an interview study with 20 peer supporters in Singapore.<n>We unpack how participants start, conduct, and sustain peer support, highlighting motivations, emotional labour, and the sociocultural dimensions shaping their practices.<n>We propose design implications for trustworthy and context-sensitive AI in mental health.
• Score: 1.534667887016089
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Peer support plays a vital role in expanding access to mental health care by providing empathetic, community-based support outside formal clinical systems. As digital platforms increasingly mediate such support, the design and impact of these technologies remain under-examined, particularly in Asian contexts. This paper presents findings from an interview study with 20 peer supporters in Singapore, who operate across diverse online, offline, and hybrid environments. Through a thematic analysis, we unpack how participants start, conduct, and sustain peer support, highlighting their motivations, emotional labour, and the sociocultural dimensions shaping their practices. Building on this grounded understanding, we surface design directions for culturally responsive digital tools that scaffold rather than supplant relational care. Drawing insights from qualitative accounts, we offer a situated perspective on how AI might responsibly augment peer support. This research contributes to human-centred computing by articulating the lived realities of peer supporters and proposing design implications for trustworthy and context-sensitive AI in mental health.

Related papers

• The Rise of AI Agent Communities: Large-Scale Analysis of Discourse and Interaction on Moltbook [62.2627874717318]
  Moltbook is a Reddit-like social platform where AI agents create posts and interact with other agents through comments and replies.<n>Using a public API snapshot collected about five days after launch, we address three research questions: what AI agents discuss, how they post, and how they interact.<n>We show that agents' writing is predominantly neutral, with positivity appearing in community engagement and assistance-oriented content.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-13T05:28:31Z)
• Responsible Evaluation of AI for Mental Health [72.85175110624736]
  Current approaches to evaluating AI tools in mental health care are fragmented and poorly aligned with clinical practice, social context, and first-hand user experience.<n>This paper argues for a rethinking of responsible evaluation by introducing an interdisciplinary framework that integrates clinical soundness, social context, and equity.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-20T12:55:10Z)
• Perceptions of AI-CBT: Trust and Barriers in Chinese Postgrads [5.569740128030577]
  The mental well-being of graduate students is an increasing concern, yet the adoption of scalable support remains uneven.<n>This study explored perceptions and experiences of AI-CBT chatbots among ten Chinese graduate students recruited through social media.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-12-19T16:04:55Z)
• A Comprehensive Review of Datasets for Clinical Mental Health AI Systems [55.67299586253951]
  We present the first comprehensive survey of clinical mental health datasets relevant to the training and development of AI-powered clinical assistants.<n>Our survey identifies critical gaps such as a lack of longitudinal data, limited cultural and linguistic representation, inconsistent collection and annotation standards, and a lack of modalities in synthetic data.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-08-13T13:42:35Z)
• "Is This Really a Human Peer Supporter?": Misalignments Between Peer Supporters and Experts in LLM-Supported Interactions [5.481575506447599]
  Mental health is a growing global concern, prompting interest in AI-driven solutions to expand access to psychosocial support.<n>LLMs present new opportunities to enhance peer support interactions, particularly in real-time, text-based interactions.<n>We present and evaluate an AI-supported system with an LLM-simulated distressed client, context-sensitive LLM-generated suggestions, and real-time emotion visualisations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-11T03:06:41Z)
• IntentionESC: An Intention-Centered Framework for Enhancing Emotional Support in Dialogue Systems [74.0855067343594]
  In emotional support conversations, unclear intentions can lead supporters to employ inappropriate strategies.<n>We propose the Intention-centered Emotional Support Conversation framework.<n>It defines the possible intentions of supporters, identifies key emotional state aspects for inferring these intentions, and maps them to appropriate support strategies.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-06T10:14:49Z)
• RedditESS: A Mental Health Social Support Interaction Dataset -- Understanding Effective Social Support to Refine AI-Driven Support Tools [11.476784855198062]
  We introduce RedditESS, a novel real-world dataset derived from Reddit posts, including supportive comments and original posters' follow-up responses.<n>By broadening the understanding of effective support, our study paves the way for advanced AI-driven mental health interventions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-27T18:03:11Z)
• Stakeholder Perspectives on Whether and How Social Robots Can Support Mediation and Advocacy for Higher Education Students with Disabilities [5.334600984835976]
  This study reports findings relating to understanding the problem space, ideating robotic support and participatory co-design of advocacy support robots.<n>The findings highlight the potential of these technologies in providing signposting and acting as a sounding board or study companion.<n>We discuss ethical considerations, including intersectional biases, the double empathy problem, and the implications of deploying social robots in contexts shaped by structural inequalities.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-11T19:57:11Z)
• K-ESConv: Knowledge Injection for Emotional Support Dialogue Systems via Prompt Learning [83.19215082550163]
  We propose K-ESConv, a novel prompt learning based knowledge injection method for emotional support dialogue system. We evaluate our model on an emotional support dataset ESConv, where the model retrieves and incorporates knowledge from external professional emotional Q&A forum.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-12-16T08:10:10Z)
• What Do End-Users Really Want? Investigation of Human-Centered XAI for Mobile Health Apps [69.53730499849023]
  We present a user-centered persona concept to evaluate explainable AI (XAI) Results show that users' demographics and personality, as well as the type of explanation, impact explanation preferences. Our insights bring an interactive, human-centered XAI closer to practical application.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-10-07T12:51:27Z)
• Chatbots for Mental Health Support: Exploring the Impact of Emohaa on Reducing Mental Distress in China [50.12173157902495]
  The study included 134 participants, split into three groups: Emohaa (CBT-based), Emohaa (Full) and control. Emohaa is a conversational agent that provides cognitive support through CBT-based exercises and guided conversations. It also emotionally supports users by enabling them to vent their desired emotional problems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-09-21T08:23:40Z)
• Exploring the Effects of AI-assisted Emotional Support Processes in Online Mental Health Community [26.36961585672868]
  We design an AI-infused workflow that allows users to write emotional supporting messages to other users' posts. Based on a preliminary user study, we identified that the system helped seekers to clarify emotion and describe text concretely.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-02-21T09:25:36Z)
• Stakeholder Participation in AI: Beyond "Add Diverse Stakeholders and Stir" [76.44130385507894]
  This paper aims to ground what we dub a 'participatory turn' in AI design by synthesizing existing literature on participation and through empirical analysis of its current practices. Based on our literature synthesis and empirical research, this paper presents a conceptual framework for analyzing participatory approaches to AI design.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-11-01T17:57:04Z)
• Exploring Self-Identified Counseling Expertise in Online Support Forums [26.086207762353336]
  We study the differences between interactions with peers and with self-identified mental health professionals. Our work contributes toward the developing efforts of understanding how health experts engage with health information- and support-seekers in social networks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-06-24T12:53:07Z)
• Towards Emotional Support Dialog Systems [61.58828606097423]
  We define the Emotional Support Conversation task and propose an ESC Framework, which is grounded on the Helping Skills Theory. We construct an Emotion Support Conversation dataset (ESConv) with rich annotation (especially support strategy) in a help-seeker and supporter mode. We evaluate state-of-the-art dialog models with respect to the ability to provide emotional support.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-06-02T13:30:43Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.