VerIF: Verification Engineering for Reinforcement Learning in Instruction Following
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2506.09942v1
- Date: Wed, 11 Jun 2025 17:10:36 GMT
- Title: VerIF: Verification Engineering for Reinforcement Learning in Instruction Following
- Authors: Hao Peng, Yunjia Qi, Xiaozhi Wang, Bin Xu, Lei Hou, Juanzi Li,
- Abstract summary: Reinforcement learning with verifiable rewards (RLVR) has become a key technique for enhancing large language models (LLMs)<n>We propose VerIF, a verification method that combines rule-based code verification with LLM-based verification from a large reasoning model.<n>We apply RL training with VerIF to two models, achieving significant improvements across several representative instruction-following benchmarks.
- Score: 55.60192044049083
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
- Abstract: Reinforcement learning with verifiable rewards (RLVR) has become a key technique for enhancing large language models (LLMs), with verification engineering playing a central role. However, best practices for RL in instruction following remain underexplored. In this work, we explore the verification challenge in RL for instruction following and propose VerIF, a verification method that combines rule-based code verification with LLM-based verification from a large reasoning model (e.g., QwQ-32B). To support this approach, we construct a high-quality instruction-following dataset, VerInstruct, containing approximately 22,000 instances with associated verification signals. We apply RL training with VerIF to two models, achieving significant improvements across several representative instruction-following benchmarks. The trained models reach state-of-the-art performance among models of comparable size and generalize well to unseen constraints. We further observe that their general capabilities remain unaffected, suggesting that RL with VerIF can be integrated into existing RL recipes to enhance overall model performance. We have released our datasets, codes, and models to facilitate future research at https://github.com/THU-KEG/VerIF.
Related papers
- DiffuCoder: Understanding and Improving Masked Diffusion Models for Code Generation [68.19756761027351]
Diffusion large language models (dLLMs) are compelling alternatives to autoregressive (AR) models.<n>We investigate their denoising processes and reinforcement learning methods.<n>Our work provides deeper insight into the machinery of dLLM generation and offers an effective, diffusion-native RL training framework.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-06-25T17:35:47Z) - Ring-lite: Scalable Reasoning via C3PO-Stabilized Reinforcement Learning for LLMs [51.21041884010009]
Ring-lite is a Mixture-of-Experts (MoE)-based large language model optimized via reinforcement learning (RL)<n>Our approach matches the performance of state-of-the-art (SOTA) small-scale reasoning models on challenging benchmarks.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-06-17T17:12:34Z) - Reinforcing General Reasoning without Verifiers [47.72684162518086]
We propose a verifier-free method (VeriFree) that bypasses answer verification and instead uses RL to directly maximize the probability of generating the reference answer.<n>VeriFree matches and even surpasses verifier-based methods on extensive evaluations across MMLU-Pro, GPQA, SuperGPQA, and math-related benchmarks.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-05-27T17:56:27Z) - SeRL: Self-Play Reinforcement Learning for Large Language Models with Limited Data [65.56911325914582]
We propose Self-play Reinforcement Learning (SeRL) to bootstrap Large Language Models (LLMs) training with limited initial data.<n>The proposed SeRL yields results superior to its counterparts and achieves performance on par with those obtained by high-quality data with verifiable rewards.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-05-25T13:28:04Z) - VerifyBench: Benchmarking Reference-based Reward Systems for Large Language Models [55.39064621869925]
OpenAI o1 and DeepSeek-R1 have achieved remarkable performance in the domain of reasoning.<n>A key component of their training is the incorporation of verifiable rewards within reinforcement learning.<n>Existing reward benchmarks do not evaluate reference-based reward systems.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-05-21T17:54:43Z) - Does Reinforcement Learning Really Incentivize Reasoning Capacity in LLMs Beyond the Base Model? [67.30809748319486]
Reinforcement Learning with Verifiable Rewards (RLVR) has recently demonstrated notable success in enhancing the reasoning performance of large language models (LLMs)<n>This study critically examines the current state of RLVR.<n>We find that the current training setup does not elicit fundamentally new reasoning patterns.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-04-18T17:59:56Z) - Crossing the Reward Bridge: Expanding RL with Verifiable Rewards Across Diverse Domains [92.36624674516553]
Reinforcement learning with verifiable rewards (RLVR) has demonstrated significant success in enhancing mathematical reasoning and coding performance of large language models (LLMs)<n>We investigate the effectiveness and scalability of RLVR across diverse real-world domains including medicine, chemistry, psychology, economics, and education.<n>We utilize a generative scoring technique that yields soft, model-based reward signals to overcome limitations posed by binary verifications.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-03-31T08:22:49Z) - OpenVLThinker: An Early Exploration to Complex Vision-Language Reasoning via Iterative Self-Improvement [91.88062410741833]
This study investigates whether similar reasoning capabilities can be successfully integrated into large vision-language models (LVLMs)<n>We consider an approach that iteratively leverages supervised fine-tuning (SFT) on lightweight training data and Reinforcement Learning (RL) to further improve model generalization.<n>OpenVLThinker, a LVLM exhibiting consistently improved reasoning performance on challenging benchmarks such as MathVista, MathVerse, and MathVision, demonstrates the potential of our strategy for robust vision-language reasoning.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-03-21T17:52:43Z) - iQRL -- Implicitly Quantized Representations for Sample-efficient Reinforcement Learning [24.684363928059113]
We propose an efficient representation learning method using only a self-supervised latent-state consistency loss.
We achieve high performance and prevent representation collapse by quantizing the latent representation.
Our method, named iQRL: implicitly Quantized Reinforcement Learning, is straightforward, compatible with any model-free RL algorithm.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-06-04T18:15:44Z) - RL-VLM-F: Reinforcement Learning from Vision Language Foundation Model Feedback [24.759613248409167]
Reward engineering has long been a challenge in Reinforcement Learning research.
We propose RL-VLM-F, a method that automatically generates reward functions for agents to learn new tasks.
We demonstrate that RL-VLM-F successfully produces effective rewards and policies across various domains.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-02-06T04:06:06Z) - Automatic Unit Test Data Generation and Actor-Critic Reinforcement
Learning for Code Synthesis [16.88062487980405]
We present a novel approach to automatically obtain data consisting of function signatures and associated Unit Tests.
We show that it, in conjunction with automatically generated training data, leads to improvement of a pre-trained code language model's performance.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-10-20T17:13:16Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.