Beyond Random Sampling: Efficient Language Model Pretraining via Curriculum Learning

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2506.11300v1
• Date: Thu, 12 Jun 2025 21:06:57 GMT
• Title: Beyond Random Sampling: Efficient Language Model Pretraining via Curriculum Learning
• Authors: Yang Zhang, Amr Mohamed, Hadi Abdine, Guokan Shang, Michalis Vazirgiannis,
• Abstract summary: We show that curriculum learning consistently improves convergence in early and mid-training phases.<n>We identify compression ratio, lexical diversity, and readability as effective difficulty signals across settings.
• Score: 23.900888224619
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Curriculum learning has shown promise in improving training efficiency and generalization in various machine learning domains, yet its potential in pretraining language models remains underexplored, prompting our work as the first systematic investigation in this area. We experimented with different settings, including vanilla curriculum learning, pacing-based sampling, and interleaved curricula-guided by six difficulty metrics spanning linguistic and information-theoretic perspectives. We train models under these settings and evaluate their performance on eight diverse benchmarks. Our experiments reveal that curriculum learning consistently improves convergence in early and mid-training phases, and can yield lasting gains when used as a warmup strategy with up to $3.5\%$ improvement. Notably, we identify compression ratio, lexical diversity, and readability as effective difficulty signals across settings. Our findings highlight the importance of data ordering in large-scale pretraining and provide actionable insights for scalable, data-efficient model development under realistic training scenarios.

Related papers

• Your Pretrained Model Tells the Difficulty Itself: A Self-Adaptive Curriculum Learning Paradigm for Natural Language Understanding [53.63482987410292]
  We present a self-adaptive curriculum learning paradigm that prioritizes fine-tuning examples based on difficulty scores predicted by pre-trained language models.<n>We evaluate our method on four natural language understanding (NLU) datasets covering both binary and multi-class classification tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-07-13T19:36:17Z)
• Analyzing Mitigation Strategies for Catastrophic Forgetting in End-to-End Training of Spoken Language Models [79.90523648823522]
  Multi-stage continual learning can lead to catastrophic forgetting.<n>This paper evaluates three mitigation strategies-model merging, discounting the LoRA scaling factor, and experience replay.<n>Results show that experience replay is the most effective, with further gains achieved by combining it with other methods.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-23T05:50:14Z)
• Training Dynamics of a 1.7B LLaMa Model: A Data-Efficient Approach [10.39475177812483]
  We share insights gained from training DMaS-LLaMa-Lite on approximately 20 billion tokens of data.<n>We chronicle the full training trajectory, documenting how evolving validation loss levels and downstream benchmarks reflect transitions from incoherent text to fluent, contextually grounded output.<n>By detailing these experiences and offering training logs, checkpoints, and sample outputs, we aim to guide future researchers and practitioners in refining their pretraining strategies.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-12-17T21:15:52Z)
• What Do Learning Dynamics Reveal About Generalization in LLM Reasoning? [83.83230167222852]
  We find that a model's generalization behavior can be effectively characterized by a training metric we call pre-memorization train accuracy. By connecting a model's learning behavior to its generalization, pre-memorization train accuracy can guide targeted improvements to training strategies.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-12T09:52:40Z)
• Deciphering Cross-Modal Alignment in Large Vision-Language Models with Modality Integration Rate [118.37653302885607]
  We present the Modality Integration Rate (MIR), an effective, robust, and generalized metric to indicate the multi-modal pre-training quality of Large Vision Language Models (LVLMs) MIR is indicative about training data selection, training strategy schedule, and model architecture design to get better pre-training results.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-09T17:59:04Z)
• The Fine Line: Navigating Large Language Model Pretraining with Down-streaming Capability Analysis [27.310894780313618]
  This paper undertakes a comprehensive comparison of model capabilities at various pretraining intermediate checkpoints. We confirm that specific downstream metrics exhibit similar training dynamics across models of different sizes. In addition to our core findings, we've reproduced Amber and OpenLLaMA, releasing their intermediate checkpoints.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-01T16:00:01Z)
• CLIMB: Curriculum Learning for Infant-inspired Model Building [6.4766496232839685]
  We describe our team's contribution to the STRICT-SMALL track of the BabyLM Challenge. The challenge requires training a language model from scratch using only a relatively small training dataset of ten million words. We experiment with three variants of cognitively-motivated curriculum learning and analyze their effect on the performance of the model.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-15T11:48:16Z)
• Large Language Models Are Latent Variable Models: Explaining and Finding Good Demonstrations for In-Context Learning [104.58874584354787]
  In recent years, pre-trained large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated remarkable efficiency in achieving an inference-time few-shot learning capability known as in-context learning. This study aims to examine the in-context learning phenomenon through a Bayesian lens, viewing real-world LLMs as latent variable models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-01-27T18:59:01Z)
• Comparison and Analysis of New Curriculum Criteria for End-to-End ASR [10.698093106994804]
  Curriculum Learning is built on the observation that organized and structured assimilation of knowledge has the ability to enable faster training and better comprehension. We employ Curriculum Learning in the context of Automatic Speech Recognition. To impose structure on the training set, we explored multiple scoring functions that either use feedback from an external neural network or incorporate feedback from the model itself.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-08-10T06:56:58Z)
• Training Dynamics for Text Summarization Models [45.62439188988816]
  We analyze the training dynamics for generation models, focusing on news summarization. Across different datasets (CNN/DM, XSum, MediaSum) and summary properties, we study what the model learns at different stages of its fine-tuning process. We find that properties such as copy behavior are learnt earlier in the training process and these observations are robust across domains. On the other hand, factual errors, such as hallucination of unsupported facts, are learnt in the later stages, and this behavior is more varied across domains.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-10-15T21:13:41Z)
• Pre-training Text Representations as Meta Learning [113.3361289756749]
  We introduce a learning algorithm which directly optimize model's ability to learn text representations for effective learning of downstream tasks. We show that there is an intrinsic connection between multi-task pre-training and model-agnostic meta-learning with a sequence of meta-train steps.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-04-12T09:05:47Z)
• Fine-Tuning Pretrained Language Models: Weight Initializations, Data Orders, and Early Stopping [62.78338049381917]
  Fine-tuning pretrained contextual word embedding models to supervised downstream tasks has become commonplace in natural language processing. We experiment with four datasets from the GLUE benchmark, fine-tuning BERT hundreds of times on each while varying only the random seeds. We find substantial performance increases compared to previously reported results, and we quantify how the performance of the best-found model varies as a function of the number of fine-tuning trials.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-02-15T02:40:10Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.