DeepResearch Bench: A Comprehensive Benchmark for Deep Research Agents

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2506.11763v1
• Date: Fri, 13 Jun 2025 13:17:32 GMT
• Title: DeepResearch Bench: A Comprehensive Benchmark for Deep Research Agents
• Authors: Mingxuan Du, Benfeng Xu, Chiwei Zhu, Xiaorui Wang, Zhendong Mao,
• Abstract summary: DeepResearch Bench is a benchmark consisting of 100 PhD-level research tasks.<n> evaluating Deep Research Agents is inherently complex and labor-intensive.<n>We propose two novel methodologies that achieve strong alignment with human judgment.
• Score: 30.768405850755602
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Deep Research Agents are a prominent category of LLM-based agents. By autonomously orchestrating multistep web exploration, targeted retrieval, and higher-order synthesis, they transform vast amounts of online information into analyst-grade, citation-rich reports--compressing hours of manual desk research into minutes. However, a comprehensive benchmark for systematically evaluating the capabilities of these agents remains absent. To bridge this gap, we present DeepResearch Bench, a benchmark consisting of 100 PhD-level research tasks, each meticulously crafted by domain experts across 22 distinct fields. Evaluating DRAs is inherently complex and labor-intensive. We therefore propose two novel methodologies that achieve strong alignment with human judgment. The first is a reference-based method with adaptive criteria to assess the quality of generated research reports. The other framework is introduced to evaluate DRA's information retrieval and collection capabilities by assessing its effective citation count and overall citation accuracy. We have open-sourced DeepResearch Bench and key components of these frameworks at https://github.com/Ayanami0730/deep_research_bench to accelerate the development of practical LLM-based agents.

Related papers

• Deep Research Comparator: A Platform For Fine-grained Human Annotations of Deep Research Agents [30.401980824941003]
  We introduce Deep Research Comparator, a platform that offers a holistic framework for evaluating deep research agents.<n>Given a user query, our platform displays the final reports from two different agents along with their intermediate steps during generation.<n>Annotators can evaluate the overall quality of final reports based on side-by-side comparison.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-07-07T21:35:09Z)
• Benchmarking Deep Search over Heterogeneous Enterprise Data [73.55304268238474]
  We present a new benchmark for evaluating a form of retrieval-augmented generation (RAG)<n>RAG requires source-aware, multi-hop reasoning over diverse, sparsed, but related sources.<n>We build it using a synthetic data pipeline that simulates business across product planning, development, and support stages.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-29T08:34:59Z)
• Mind2Web 2: Evaluating Agentic Search with Agent-as-a-Judge [34.672897171399775]
  Agentic search systems autonomously browse the web, synthesize information, and return comprehensive citation-backed answers.<n>Mind2Web 2 is a benchmark of 130 realistic, high-quality, and long-horizon tasks constructed with over 1000 hours of human labor.<n>Our method constructs task-specific judge agents based on a tree-structured design to automatically assess both answer correctness and source attribution.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-26T17:32:50Z)
• From Web Search towards Agentic Deep Research: Incentivizing Search with Reasoning Agents [96.65646344634524]
  Large Language Models (LLMs), endowed with reasoning and agentic capabilities, are ushering in a new paradigm termed Agentic Deep Research.<n>We trace the evolution from static web search to interactive, agent-based systems that plan, explore, and learn.<n>We demonstrate that Agentic Deep Research not only significantly outperforms existing approaches, but is also poised to become the dominant paradigm for future information seeking.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-23T17:27:19Z)
• Deep Research Agents: A Systematic Examination And Roadmap [79.04813794804377]
  Deep Research (DR) agents are designed to tackle complex, multi-turn informational research tasks.<n>In this paper, we conduct a detailed analysis of the foundational technologies and architectural components that constitute DR agents.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-22T16:52:48Z)
• DeepResearchGym: A Free, Transparent, and Reproducible Evaluation Sandbox for Deep Research [25.368303145176554]
  DeepResearchGym is an open-source sandbox that combines a search API with a rigorous evaluation protocol for benchmarking deep research systems.<n>The API indexes large-scale public web corpora, namely ClueWeb22 and FineWeb, using a state-of-the-art dense retriever and approximate nearest neighbor search via DiskANN.<n>It achieves lower latency than popular commercial APIs while ensuring stable document rankings across runs, and is freely available for research use.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-25T18:16:13Z)
• InfoDeepSeek: Benchmarking Agentic Information Seeking for Retrieval-Augmented Generation [63.55258191625131]
  InfoDeepSeek is a new benchmark for assessing agentic information seeking in real-world, dynamic web environments.<n>We propose a systematic methodology for constructing challenging queries satisfying the criteria of determinacy, difficulty, and diversity.<n>We develop the first evaluation framework tailored to dynamic agentic information seeking, including fine-grained metrics about the accuracy, utility, and compactness of information seeking outcomes.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-21T14:44:40Z)
• DeepResearcher: Scaling Deep Research via Reinforcement Learning in Real-world Environments [20.498100965239818]
  We introduce DeepResearcher, the first comprehensive framework for end-to-end training of LLM-based deep research agents.<n>Unlike RAG-based approaches that assume all necessary information exists within a fixed corpus, our method trains agents to navigate the noisy, unstructured, and dynamic nature of the open web.<n>Extensive experiments on open-domain research tasks demonstrate that DeepResearcher achieves substantial improvements of up to 28.9 points over prompt engineering-based baselines.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-04T04:41:28Z)
• Enhancing LLM Reasoning with Reward-guided Tree Search [95.06503095273395]
  o1-like reasoning approach is challenging, and researchers have been making various attempts to advance this open area of research.<n>We present a preliminary exploration into enhancing the reasoning abilities of LLMs through reward-guided tree search algorithms.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-18T16:15:17Z)
• STaRK: Benchmarking LLM Retrieval on Textual and Relational Knowledge Bases [93.96463520716759]
  We develop STARK, a large-scale Semi-structure retrieval benchmark on Textual and Knowledge Bases. Our benchmark covers three domains: product search, academic paper search, and queries in precision medicine. We design a novel pipeline to synthesize realistic user queries that integrate diverse relational information and complex textual properties.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-19T22:54:54Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.