Detecting Hard-Coded Credentials in Software Repositories via LLMs

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2506.13090v1
• Date: Mon, 16 Jun 2025 04:33:48 GMT
• Title: Detecting Hard-Coded Credentials in Software Repositories via LLMs
• Authors: Chidera Biringa, Gokhan Kul,
• Abstract summary: Software developers frequently hard-code credentials such as passwords, generic secrets, private keys, and generic tokens in software repositories.<n>These credentials create attack surfaces exploitable by a potential adversary to conduct malicious exploits such as backdoor attacks.<n>Recent detection efforts utilize embedding models to vectorize textual credentials before passing them to classifiers for predictions.<n>Our model outperforms the current state-of-the-art by 13% in F1 measure on the benchmark dataset.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Software developers frequently hard-code credentials such as passwords, generic secrets, private keys, and generic tokens in software repositories, even though it is strictly advised against due to the severe threat to the security of the software. These credentials create attack surfaces exploitable by a potential adversary to conduct malicious exploits such as backdoor attacks. Recent detection efforts utilize embedding models to vectorize textual credentials before passing them to classifiers for predictions. However, these models struggle to discriminate between credentials with contextual and complex sequences resulting in high false positive predictions. Context-dependent Pre-trained Language Models (PLMs) or Large Language Models (LLMs) such as Generative Pre-trained Transformers (GPT) tackled this drawback by leveraging the transformer neural architecture capacity for self-attention to capture contextual dependencies between words in input sequences. As a result, GPT has achieved wide success in several natural language understanding endeavors. Hence, we assess LLMs to represent these observations and feed extracted embedding vectors to a deep learning classifier to detect hard-coded credentials. Our model outperforms the current state-of-the-art by 13% in F1 measure on the benchmark dataset. We have made all source code and data publicly available to facilitate the reproduction of all results presented in this paper.

Related papers

• Decompiling Smart Contracts with a Large Language Model [51.49197239479266]
  Despite Etherscan's 78,047,845 smart contracts deployed on (as of May 26, 2025), a mere 767,520 ( 1%) are open source.<n>This opacity necessitates the automated semantic analysis of on-chain smart contract bytecode.<n>We introduce a pioneering decompilation pipeline that transforms bytecode into human-readable and semantically faithful Solidity code.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-24T13:42:59Z)
• Hey, That's My Data! Label-Only Dataset Inference in Large Language Models [63.35066172530291]
  CatShift is a label-only dataset-inference framework.<n>It capitalizes on catastrophic forgetting: the tendency of an LLM to overwrite previously learned knowledge when exposed to new data.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-06T13:02:59Z)
• Your Language Model Can Secretly Write Like Humans: Contrastive Paraphrase Attacks on LLM-Generated Text Detectors [65.27124213266491]
  We propose textbfContrastive textbfParaphrase textbfAttack (CoPA), a training-free method that effectively deceives text detectors.<n>CoPA constructs an auxiliary machine-like word distribution as a contrast to the human-like distribution generated by large language models.<n>Our theoretical analysis suggests the superiority of the proposed attack.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-21T10:08:39Z)
• Large Language Models Can Verbatim Reproduce Long Malicious Sequences [23.0516001201445]
  Backdoor attacks on machine learning models have been extensively studied.<n>This paper re-examines the concept of backdoor attacks in the context of Large Language Models.<n>We find that arbitrary responses containing hard coded keys of $leq100$ random characters can be reproduced when triggered by a target input.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-21T23:24:49Z)
• SecEncoder: Logs are All You Need in Security [8.591459170396698]
  This paper introduces SecEncoder, a specialized small language model that is pretrained using security logs. Experimental results indicate that SecEncoder outperforms other LMs, such as BERTa-v3-large and OpenAI's Embedding (emtext-ada) models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-12T03:56:07Z)
• Security Vulnerability Detection with Multitask Self-Instructed Fine-Tuning of Large Language Models [8.167614500821223]
  We introduce MSIVD, multitask self-instructed fine-tuning for vulnerability detection, inspired by chain-of-thought prompting and LLM self-instruction. Our experiments demonstrate that MSIVD achieves superior performance, outperforming the highest LLM-based vulnerability detector baseline (LineVul) with a F1 score of 0.92 on the BigVul dataset, and 0.48 on the PreciseBugs dataset.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-09T19:18:05Z)
• CodeIP: A Grammar-Guided Multi-Bit Watermark for Large Language Models of Code [56.019447113206006]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) have achieved remarkable progress in code generation.<n>CodeIP is a novel multi-bit watermarking technique that inserts additional information to preserve provenance details.<n>Experiments conducted on a real-world dataset across five programming languages demonstrate the effectiveness of CodeIP.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-24T04:25:04Z)
• Token-Level Adversarial Prompt Detection Based on Perplexity Measures and Contextual Information [67.78183175605761]
  Large Language Models are susceptible to adversarial prompt attacks. This vulnerability underscores a significant concern regarding the robustness and reliability of LLMs. We introduce a novel approach to detecting adversarial prompts at a token level.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-20T03:17:21Z)
• Memorization for Good: Encryption with Autoregressive Language Models [8.645826579841692]
  We propose the first symmetric encryption algorithm with autoregressive language models (SELM) We show that autoregressive LMs can encode arbitrary data into a compact real-valued vector (i.e., encryption) and then losslessly decode the vector to the original message (i.e. decryption) via random subspace optimization and greedy decoding.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-15T05:42:34Z)
• Sentence Embedding Leaks More Information than You Expect: Generative Embedding Inversion Attack to Recover the Whole Sentence [37.63047048491312]
  We propose a generative embedding inversion attack (GEIA) that aims to reconstruct input sequences based only on their sentence embeddings. Given the black-box access to a language model, we treat sentence embeddings as initial tokens' representations and train or fine-tune a powerful decoder model to decode the whole sequences directly.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-04T17:31:41Z)
• CodeLMSec Benchmark: Systematically Evaluating and Finding Security Vulnerabilities in Black-Box Code Language Models [58.27254444280376]
  Large language models (LLMs) for automatic code generation have achieved breakthroughs in several programming tasks. Training data for these models is usually collected from the Internet (e.g., from open-source repositories) and is likely to contain faults and security vulnerabilities. This unsanitized training data can cause the language models to learn these vulnerabilities and propagate them during the code generation procedure.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-02-08T11:54:07Z)
• Software Vulnerability Detection via Deep Learning over Disaggregated Code Graph Representation [57.92972327649165]
  This work explores a deep learning approach to automatically learn the insecure patterns from code corpora. Because code naturally admits graph structures with parsing, we develop a novel graph neural network (GNN) to exploit both the semantic context and structural regularity of a program.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-09-07T21:24:36Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.