Unveiling the Learning Mind of Language Models: A Cognitive Framework and Empirical Study

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2506.13464v1
• Date: Mon, 16 Jun 2025 13:24:50 GMT
• Title: Unveiling the Learning Mind of Language Models: A Cognitive Framework and Empirical Study
• Authors: Zhengyu Hu, Jianxun Lian, Zheyuan Xiao, Seraphina Zhang, Tianfu Wang, Nicholas Jing Yuan, Xing Xie, Hui Xiong,
• Abstract summary: Large language models (LLMs) have shown impressive capabilities across tasks such as mathematics, coding, and reasoning.<n>Yet their learning ability, which is crucial for adapting to dynamic environments and acquiring new knowledge, remains underexplored.
• Score: 50.065744358362345
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Large language models (LLMs) have shown impressive capabilities across tasks such as mathematics, coding, and reasoning, yet their learning ability, which is crucial for adapting to dynamic environments and acquiring new knowledge, remains underexplored. In this work, we address this gap by introducing a framework inspired by cognitive psychology and education. Specifically, we decompose general learning ability into three distinct, complementary dimensions: Learning from Instructor (acquiring knowledge via explicit guidance), Learning from Concept (internalizing abstract structures and generalizing to new contexts), and Learning from Experience (adapting through accumulated exploration and feedback). We conduct a comprehensive empirical study across the three learning dimensions and identify several insightful findings, such as (i) interaction improves learning; (ii) conceptual understanding is scale-emergent and benefits larger models; and (iii) LLMs are effective few-shot learners but not many-shot learners. Based on our framework and empirical findings, we introduce a benchmark that provides a unified and realistic evaluation of LLMs' general learning abilities across three learning cognition dimensions. It enables diagnostic insights and supports evaluation and development of more adaptive and human-like models.

Related papers

• Decoupling Knowledge and Reasoning in LLMs: An Exploration Using Cognitive Dual-System Theory [2.8952499264943445]
  Large language models (LLMs) leverage both knowledge and reasoning during inference.<n>We propose a cognition attribution framework to decouple the contribution of knowledge and reasoning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-07-24T08:24:52Z)
• Refine Knowledge of Large Language Models via Adaptive Contrastive Learning [54.61213933999464]
  A mainstream category of methods is to reduce hallucinations by optimizing the knowledge representation of Large Language Models.<n>We believe that the process of models refining knowledge can greatly benefit from the way humans learn.<n>In our work, by imitating the human learning process, we design an Adaptive Contrastive Learning strategy.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-11T02:19:13Z)
• Large Language Models and Cognitive Science: A Comprehensive Review of Similarities, Differences, and Challenges [14.739357670600102]
  This comprehensive review explores the intersection of Large Language Models (LLMs) and cognitive science.<n>We analyze methods for evaluating LLMs cognitive abilities and discuss their potential as cognitive models.<n>We assess cognitive biases and limitations of LLMs, along with proposed methods for improving their performance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-09-04T02:30:12Z)
• Chain-of-Knowledge: Integrating Knowledge Reasoning into Large Language Models by Learning from Knowledge Graphs [55.317267269115845]
  Chain-of-Knowledge (CoK) is a comprehensive framework for knowledge reasoning. CoK includes methodologies for both dataset construction and model learning. We conduct extensive experiments with KnowReason.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-30T10:49:32Z)
• FAC$^2$E: Better Understanding Large Language Model Capabilities by Dissociating Language and Cognition [56.76951887823882]
  Large language models (LLMs) are primarily evaluated by overall performance on various text understanding and generation tasks. We present FAC$2$E, a framework for Fine-grAined and Cognition-grounded LLMs' Capability Evaluation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-29T21:05:37Z)
• Exploring the Cognitive Knowledge Structure of Large Language Models: An Educational Diagnostic Assessment Approach [50.125704610228254]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) have not only exhibited exceptional performance across various tasks, but also demonstrated sparks of intelligence. Recent studies have focused on assessing their capabilities on human exams and revealed their impressive competence in different domains. We conduct an evaluation using MoocRadar, a meticulously annotated human test dataset based on Bloom taxonomy.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-12T09:55:45Z)
• Unleash Model Potential: Bootstrapped Meta Self-supervised Learning [12.57396771974944]
  Long-term goal of machine learning is to learn general visual representations from a small amount of data without supervision. Self-supervised learning and meta-learning are two promising techniques to achieve this goal, but they both only partially capture the advantages. We propose a novel Bootstrapped Meta Self-Supervised Learning framework that aims to simulate the human learning process.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-08-28T02:49:07Z)
• Worth of knowledge in deep learning [3.132595571344153]
  We present a framework inspired by interpretable machine learning to evaluate the worth of knowledge. Our findings elucidate the complex relationship between data and knowledge, including dependence, synergistic, and substitution effects. Our model-agnostic framework can be applied to a variety of common network architectures, providing a comprehensive understanding of the role of prior knowledge in deep learning models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-07-03T02:25:19Z)
• Concept Learners for Few-Shot Learning [76.08585517480807]
  We propose COMET, a meta-learning method that improves generalization ability by learning to learn along human-interpretable concept dimensions. We evaluate our model on few-shot tasks from diverse domains, including fine-grained image classification, document categorization and cell type annotation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-07-14T22:04:17Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.