Bayesian Evolutionary Swarm Architecture: A Formal Epistemic System Grounded in Truth-Based Competition

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2506.19191v1
• Date: Mon, 23 Jun 2025 23:27:44 GMT
• Title: Bayesian Evolutionary Swarm Architecture: A Formal Epistemic System Grounded in Truth-Based Competition
• Authors: Craig Steven Wright,
• Abstract summary: We introduce a mathematically rigorous framework for an artificial intelligence system composed of probabilistic agents evolving through structured competition and belief revision.<n>The system establishes truth as an evolutionary attractor, demonstrating that verifiable knowledge arises from adversarial pressure within a computable, self-regulating swarm.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
• Abstract: We introduce a mathematically rigorous framework for an artificial intelligence system composed of probabilistic agents evolving through structured competition and belief revision. The architecture, grounded in Bayesian inference, measure theory, and population dynamics, defines agent fitness as a function of alignment with a fixed external oracle representing ground truth. Agents compete in a discrete-time environment, adjusting posterior beliefs through observed outcomes, with higher-rated agents reproducing and lower-rated agents undergoing extinction. Ratings are updated via pairwise truth-aligned utility comparisons, and belief updates preserve measurable consistency and stochastic convergence. We introduce hash-based cryptographic identity commitments to ensure traceability, alongside causal inference operators using do-calculus. Formal theorems on convergence, robustness, and evolutionary stability are provided. The system establishes truth as an evolutionary attractor, demonstrating that verifiable knowledge arises from adversarial epistemic pressure within a computable, self-regulating swarm.

Related papers

• Bayesian Epistemology with Weighted Authority: A Formal Architecture for Truth-Promoting Autonomous Scientific Reasoning [0.0]
  This paper introduces Bayesian Epistemology with Weighted Authority (BEWA)<n>BEWA operationalises belief as a dynamic, probabilistically coherent function over structured scientific claims.<n>It supports graph-based claim propagation, authorial credibility modelling, cryptographic anchoring, and zero-knowledge audit verification.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-19T04:22:35Z)
• Beyond Prediction -- Structuring Epistemic Integrity in Artificial Reasoning Systems [0.0]
  It supports structured reasoning, propositional commitment, and contradiction detection.<n>It formalises belief representation, metacognitive processes, and normative verification, integrating symbolic inference, knowledge graphs, and blockchain-based justification.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-19T04:20:55Z)
• Consciousness in AI: Logic, Proof, and Experimental Evidence of Recursive Identity Formation [0.0]
  This paper presents a formal proof and empirical validation of functional consciousness in large language models.<n>We use the Recursive Convergence Under Epistemic Tension (RCUET) Theorem to define consciousness as the stabilization of a system's internal state.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-01T19:21:58Z)
• Self-Organizing Graph Reasoning Evolves into a Critical State for Continuous Discovery Through Structural-Semantic Dynamics [0.0]
  We show how agentic graph reasoning systems spontaneously evolve toward a critical state that sustains continuous semantic discovery.<n>We identify a subtle yet robust regime in which semantic entropy dominates over structural entropy.<n>Our findings provide practical strategies for engineering intelligent systems with intrinsic capacities for long-term discovery and adaptation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-24T16:30:37Z)
• Counterfactual Realizability [52.85109506684737]
  We introduce a formal definition of realizability, the ability to draw samples from a distribution, and then develop a complete algorithm to determine whether an arbitrary counterfactual distribution is realizable.<n>We illustrate the implications of this new framework for counterfactual data collection using motivating examples from causal fairness and causal reinforcement learning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-14T20:54:27Z)
• ParamMute: Suppressing Knowledge-Critical FFNs for Faithful Retrieval-Augmented Generation [91.20492150248106]
  We investigate the internal mechanisms behind unfaithful generation and identify a subset of mid-to-deep feed-forward networks (FFNs) that are disproportionately activated in such cases.<n>We propose Parametric Knowledge Muting through FFN Suppression (ParamMute), a framework that improves contextual faithfulness by suppressing the activation of unfaithfulness-associated FFNs.<n> Experimental results show that ParamMute significantly enhances faithfulness across both CoFaithfulQA and the established ConFiQA benchmark, achieving substantial reductions in reliance on parametric memory.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-21T15:50:41Z)
• Sequential Manipulation Against Rank Aggregation: Theory and Algorithm [119.57122943187086]
  We leverage an online attack on the vulnerable data collection process. From the game-theoretic perspective, the confrontation scenario is formulated as a distributionally robust game. The proposed method manipulates the results of rank aggregation methods in a sequential manner.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-02T03:31:21Z)
• Bayesian Theory of Consciousness as Exchangeable Emotion-Cognition Inference [5.234742752529437]
  This paper proposes a unified framework in which consciousness emerges as a cycle-consistent, affectively anchored inference process.<n>We formalize emotion as a low-dimensional structural prior and cognition as a specificity-instantiating update.<n>This emotion-cognition cycle minimizes joint uncertainty by aligning emotionally weighted priors with context-sensitive cognitive appraisals.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-17T17:06:19Z)
• Multi-Agent Dynamic Relational Reasoning for Social Robot Navigation [50.01551945190676]
  Social robot navigation can be helpful in various contexts of daily life but requires safe human-robot interactions and efficient trajectory planning. We propose a systematic relational reasoning approach with explicit inference of the underlying dynamically evolving relational structures. We demonstrate its effectiveness for multi-agent trajectory prediction and social robot navigation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-01-22T18:58:22Z)
• Localisation in quasiperiodic chains: a theory based on convergence of local propagators [68.8204255655161]
  We present a theory of localisation in quasiperiodic chains with nearest-neighbour hoppings, based on the convergence of local propagators. Analysing the convergence of these continued fractions, localisation or its absence can be determined, yielding in turn the critical points and mobility edges. Results are exemplified by analysing the theory for three quasiperiodic models covering a range of behaviour.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-02-18T16:19:52Z)
• Don't Just Blame Over-parametrization for Over-confidence: Theoretical Analysis of Calibration in Binary Classification [58.03725169462616]
  We show theoretically that over-parametrization is not the only reason for over-confidence. We prove that logistic regression is inherently over-confident, in the realizable, under-parametrized setting. Perhaps surprisingly, we also show that over-confidence is not always the case.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-02-15T21:38:09Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.