Beyond Statistical Learning: Exact Learning Is Essential for General Intelligence
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2506.23908v1
- Date: Mon, 30 Jun 2025 14:37:50 GMT
- Title: Beyond Statistical Learning: Exact Learning Is Essential for General Intelligence
- Authors: András György, Tor Lattimore, Nevena Lazić, Csaba Szepesvári,
- Abstract summary: Sound deductive reasoning is an indisputably desirable aspect of general intelligence.<n>It is well-documented that even the most advanced frontier systems regularly and consistently falter on easily-solvable reasoning tasks.<n>We argue that their unsound behavior is a consequence of the statistical learning approach powering their development.
- Score: 59.07578850674114
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
- Abstract: Sound deductive reasoning -- the ability to derive new knowledge from existing facts and rules -- is an indisputably desirable aspect of general intelligence. Despite the major advances of AI systems in areas such as math and science, especially since the introduction of transformer architectures, it is well-documented that even the most advanced frontier systems regularly and consistently falter on easily-solvable deductive reasoning tasks. Hence, these systems are unfit to fulfill the dream of achieving artificial general intelligence capable of sound deductive reasoning. We argue that their unsound behavior is a consequence of the statistical learning approach powering their development. To overcome this, we contend that to achieve reliable deductive reasoning in learning-based AI systems, researchers must fundamentally shift from optimizing for statistical performance against distributions on reasoning problems and algorithmic tasks to embracing the more ambitious exact learning paradigm, which demands correctness on all inputs. We argue that exact learning is both essential and possible, and that this ambitious objective should guide algorithm design.
Related papers
- World Models in Artificial Intelligence: Sensing, Learning, and Reasoning Like a Child [10.183372891207966]
World Models help Artificial Intelligence (AI) predict outcomes, reason about its environment, and guide decision-making.<n>We highlight six key research areas -- physics-informed learning, neurosymbolic learning, continual learning, causal inference, human-in-the-loop AI, and responsible AI -- as essential for enabling true reasoning in AI.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-03-19T12:50:40Z) - Probabilistic Artificial Intelligence [42.59649764999974]
Key aspect of intelligence is to not only make predictions, but reason about the uncertainty in these predictions, and to consider this uncertainty when making decisions.<n>We discuss the differentiation between "epistemic" uncertainty due to lack of data and "aleatoric" uncertainty, which is irreducible and stems, e.g., from noisy observations and outcomes.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-02-07T14:29:07Z) - Common Sense Is All You Need [5.280511830552275]
Artificial intelligence (AI) has made significant strides in recent years, yet it continues to struggle with a fundamental aspect of cognition present in all animals: common sense.<n>Current AI systems often lack the ability to adapt to new situations without extensive prior knowledge.<n>This manuscript argues that integrating common sense into AI systems is essential for achieving true autonomy and unlocking the full societal and commercial value of AI.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-01-11T21:23:41Z) - Artificial Expert Intelligence through PAC-reasoning [21.91294369791479]
Artificial Expert Intelligence (AEI) seeks to transcend the limitations of both Artificial General Intelligence (AGI) and narrow AI.<n>AEI seeks to integrate domain-specific expertise with critical, precise reasoning capabilities akin to those of top human experts.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-12-03T13:25:18Z) - Imagining and building wise machines: The centrality of AI metacognition [78.76893632793497]
We examine what is known about human wisdom and sketch a vision of its AI counterpart.<n>We argue that AI systems particularly struggle with metacognition.<n>We discuss how wise AI might be benchmarked, trained, and implemented.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-11-04T18:10:10Z) - Towards Automated Knowledge Integration From Human-Interpretable Representations [55.2480439325792]
We introduce and motivate theoretically the principles of informed meta-learning enabling automated and controllable inductive bias selection.<n>We empirically demonstrate the potential benefits and limitations of informed meta-learning in improving data efficiency and generalisation.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-02-25T15:08:37Z) - Learning by Applying: A General Framework for Mathematical Reasoning via
Enhancing Explicit Knowledge Learning [47.96987739801807]
We propose a framework to enhance existing models (backbones) in a principled way by explicit knowledge learning.
In LeAp, we perform knowledge learning in a novel problem-knowledge-expression paradigm.
We show that LeAp improves all backbones' performances, learns accurate knowledge, and achieves a more interpretable reasoning process.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-02-11T15:15:41Z) - A Comprehensive Survey of Continual Learning: Theory, Method and
Application [64.23253420555989]
We present a comprehensive survey of continual learning, seeking to bridge the basic settings, theoretical foundations, representative methods, and practical applications.
We summarize the general objectives of continual learning as ensuring a proper stability-plasticity trade-off and an adequate intra/inter-task generalizability in the context of resource efficiency.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-01-31T11:34:56Z) - A Survey of Deep Learning for Mathematical Reasoning [71.88150173381153]
We review the key tasks, datasets, and methods at the intersection of mathematical reasoning and deep learning over the past decade.
Recent advances in large-scale neural language models have opened up new benchmarks and opportunities to use deep learning for mathematical reasoning.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-12-20T18:46:16Z) - Inductive Biases for Deep Learning of Higher-Level Cognition [108.89281493851358]
A fascinating hypothesis is that human and animal intelligence could be explained by a few principles.
This work considers a larger list, focusing on those which concern mostly higher-level and sequential conscious processing.
The objective of clarifying these particular principles is that they could potentially help us build AI systems benefiting from humans' abilities.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-11-30T18:29:25Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.