Development and Comparative Evaluation of Three Artificial Intelligence Models (NLP, LLM, JEPA) for Predicting Triage in Emergency Departments: A 7-Month Retrospective Proof-of-Concept
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2507.01080v1
- Date: Tue, 01 Jul 2025 16:37:55 GMT
- Title: Development and Comparative Evaluation of Three Artificial Intelligence Models (NLP, LLM, JEPA) for Predicting Triage in Emergency Departments: A 7-Month Retrospective Proof-of-Concept
- Authors: Edouard Lansiaux, Ramy Azzouz, Emmanuel Chazard, Amélie Vromant, Eric Wiel,
- Abstract summary: Triage errors, including undertriage and overtriage, are persistent challenges in emergency departments (EDs)<n>This study compares the performance of three AI models in predicting triage outcomes against the FRENCH scale and clinical practice.
- Score: 0.0
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
- Abstract: Triage errors, including undertriage and overtriage, are persistent challenges in emergency departments (EDs). With increasing patient influx and staff shortages, the integration of artificial intelligence (AI) into triage protocols has gained attention. This study compares the performance of three AI models [Natural Language Processing (NLP), Large Language Models (LLM), and Joint Embedding Predictive Architecture (JEPA)] in predicting triage outcomes against the FRENCH scale and clinical practice.We conducted a retrospective analysis of a prospectively recruited cohort gathering adult patient triage data over a 7-month period at the Roger Salengro Hospital ED (Lille, France). Three AI models were trained and validated : (1) TRIAGEMASTER (NLP), (2) URGENTIAPARSE (LLM), and (3) EMERGINET (JEPA). Data included demographic details, verbatim chief complaints, vital signs, and triage outcomes based on the FRENCH scale and GEMSA coding. The primary outcome was the concordance of AI-predicted triage level with the FRENCH gold-standard. It was assessed thanks to various indicators : F1-Score, Weighted Kappa, Spearman, MAE, RMSE. The LLM model (URGENTIAPARSE) showed higher accuracy (composite score: 2.514) compared to JEPA (EMERGINET, 0.438) and NLP (TRIAGEMASTER, -3.511), outperforming nurse triage (-4.343). Secondary analyses highlighted the effectiveness of URGENTIAPARSE in predicting hospitalization needs (GEMSA) and its robustness with structured data versus raw transcripts (either for GEMSA prediction or for FRENCH prediction). LLM architecture, through abstraction of patient representations, offers the most accurate triage predictions among tested models. Integrating AI into ED workflows could enhance patient safety and operational efficiency, though integration into clinical workflows requires addressing model limitations and ensuring ethical transparency.
Related papers
- PiCME: Pipeline for Contrastive Modality Evaluation and Encoding in the MIMIC Dataset [16.263862005367667]
Multimodal deep learning holds promise for improving clinical prediction by integrating diverse patient data.<n>Contrastive learning facilitates this integration by producing a unified representation that can be reused across tasks.<n>PiCME is the first to scale contrastive learning across all modality combinations in MIMIC.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-07-03T20:45:37Z) - Holistic Artificial Intelligence in Medicine; improved performance and explainability [4.862319939462255]
xHAIM (Explainable HAIM) is a novel framework leveraging Generative AI to enhance both prediction and explainability.<n>xHAIM improves average AUC from 79.9% to 90.3% across chest pathology and operative tasks.<n>It transforms AI from a black-box predictor into an explainable decision support system, enabling clinicians to interactively trace predictions back to relevant patient data.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-06-30T19:15:06Z) - Quantifying the Reasoning Abilities of LLMs on Real-world Clinical Cases [48.87360916431396]
We introduce MedR-Bench, a benchmarking dataset of 1,453 structured patient cases, annotated with reasoning references.<n>We propose a framework encompassing three critical examination recommendation, diagnostic decision-making, and treatment planning, simulating the entire patient care journey.<n>Using this benchmark, we evaluate five state-of-the-art reasoning LLMs, including DeepSeek-R1, OpenAI-o3-mini, and Gemini-2.0-Flash Thinking, etc.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-03-06T18:35:39Z) - Development and Comparative Analysis of Machine Learning Models for Hypoxemia Severity Triage in CBRNE Emergency Scenarios Using Physiological and Demographic Data from Medical-Grade Devices [0.0]
Gradient Boosting Models (GBMs) outperformed sequential models in terms of training speed, interpretability, and reliability.
A 5-minute prediction window was chosen for timely intervention, with minute-levels standardizing the data.
This study highlights ML's potential to improve triage and reduce alarm fatigue.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-10-30T23:24:28Z) - Enhancing End Stage Renal Disease Outcome Prediction: A Multi-Sourced Data-Driven Approach [7.212939068975618]
We utilized data about 10,326 CKD patients, combining their clinical and claims information from 2009 to 2018.<n>A 24-month observation window was identified as optimal for balancing early detection and prediction accuracy.<n>The 2021 eGFR equation improved prediction accuracy and reduced racial bias, notably for African American patients.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-10-02T03:21:01Z) - The effect of data augmentation and 3D-CNN depth on Alzheimer's Disease
detection [51.697248252191265]
This work summarizes and strictly observes best practices regarding data handling, experimental design, and model evaluation.
We focus on Alzheimer's Disease (AD) detection, which serves as a paradigmatic example of challenging problem in healthcare.
Within this framework, we train predictive 15 models, considering three different data augmentation strategies and five distinct 3D CNN architectures.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-09-13T10:40:41Z) - TREEMENT: Interpretable Patient-Trial Matching via Personalized Dynamic
Tree-Based Memory Network [54.332862955411656]
Clinical trials are critical for drug development but often suffer from expensive and inefficient patient recruitment.
In recent years, machine learning models have been proposed for speeding up patient recruitment via automatically matching patients with clinical trials.
We introduce a dynamic tree-based memory network model named TREEMENT to provide accurate and interpretable patient trial matching.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-07-19T12:35:09Z) - Large Language Models for Healthcare Data Augmentation: An Example on
Patient-Trial Matching [49.78442796596806]
We propose an innovative privacy-aware data augmentation approach for patient-trial matching (LLM-PTM)
Our experiments demonstrate a 7.32% average improvement in performance using the proposed LLM-PTM method, and the generalizability to new data is improved by 12.12%.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-03-24T03:14:00Z) - Clinical Deterioration Prediction in Brazilian Hospitals Based on
Artificial Neural Networks and Tree Decision Models [56.93322937189087]
An extremely boosted neural network (XBNet) is used to predict clinical deterioration (CD)
The XGBoost model obtained the best results in predicting CD among Brazilian hospitals' data.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-12-17T23:29:14Z) - Advancing COVID-19 Diagnosis with Privacy-Preserving Collaboration in
Artificial Intelligence [79.038671794961]
We launch the Unified CT-COVID AI Diagnostic Initiative (UCADI), where the AI model can be distributedly trained and independently executed at each host institution.
Our study is based on 9,573 chest computed tomography scans (CTs) from 3,336 patients collected from 23 hospitals located in China and the UK.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-11-18T00:43:41Z) - Transformer-based unsupervised patient representation learning based on
medical claims for risk stratification and analysis [3.5492837081144204]
Transformer-based Multimodal AutoEncoder (TMAE) can learn efficient patient representation by encoding meaningful information from the claims data.
We trained TMAE using a real-world pediatric claims dataset containing more than 600,000 patients.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-06-23T21:29:50Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.