Loss Functions in Diffusion Models: A Comparative Study

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2507.01516v1
• Date: Wed, 02 Jul 2025 09:23:34 GMT
• Title: Loss Functions in Diffusion Models: A Comparative Study
• Authors: Dibyanshu Kumar, Philipp Vaeth, Magda Gregorová,
• Abstract summary: We explore the different target objectives and corresponding loss functions in detail.<n>We present a systematic overview of their relationships, unifying them under the framework of the variational lower bound objective.<n>We evaluate how the choice of objective impacts the model ability to achieve specific goals, such as generating high-quality samples or accurately estimating likelihoods.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Diffusion models have emerged as powerful generative models, inspiring extensive research into their underlying mechanisms. One of the key questions in this area is the loss functions these models shall train with. Multiple formulations have been introduced in the literature over the past several years with some links and some critical differences stemming from various initial considerations. In this paper, we explore the different target objectives and corresponding loss functions in detail. We present a systematic overview of their relationships, unifying them under the framework of the variational lower bound objective. We complement this theoretical analysis with an empirical study providing insights into the conditions under which these objectives diverge in performance and the underlying factors contributing to such deviations. Additionally, we evaluate how the choice of objective impacts the model ability to achieve specific goals, such as generating high-quality samples or accurately estimating likelihoods. This study offers a unified understanding of loss functions in diffusion models, contributing to more efficient and goal-oriented model designs in future research.

Related papers

• Preference Learning for AI Alignment: a Causal Perspective [55.2480439325792]
  We frame this problem in a causal paradigm, providing the rich toolbox of causality to identify persistent challenges.<n>Inheriting from the literature of causal inference, we identify key assumptions necessary for reliable generalisation.<n>We illustrate failure modes of naive reward models and demonstrate how causally-inspired approaches can improve model robustness.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-06T10:45:42Z)
• Equally Critical: Samples, Targets, and Their Mappings in Datasets [6.859656302020063]
  This paper investigates how sample and target collectively influence training dynamic.<n>We first establish a taxonomy of existing paradigms through the lens of sample-target interactions.<n>We then propose a novel unified loss framework to assess their impact on training efficiency.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-17T08:27:19Z)
• Causality can systematically address the monsters under the bench(marks) [64.36592889550431]
  Benchmarks are plagued by various biases, artifacts, or leakage.<n>Models may behave unreliably due to poorly explored failure modes.<n> causality offers an ideal framework to systematically address these challenges.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-07T17:01:37Z)
• Influence Functions for Scalable Data Attribution in Diffusion Models [52.92223039302037]
  Diffusion models have led to significant advancements in generative modelling.<n>Yet their widespread adoption poses challenges regarding data attribution and interpretability.<n>We develop an influence functions framework to address these challenges.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-17T17:59:02Z)
• Diffusion Models in Low-Level Vision: A Survey [82.77962165415153]
  diffusion model-based solutions have emerged as widely acclaimed for their ability to produce samples of superior quality and diversity.<n>We present three generic diffusion modeling frameworks and explore their correlations with other deep generative models.<n>We summarize extended diffusion models applied in other tasks, including medical, remote sensing, and video scenarios.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-17T01:49:27Z)
• The Importance of Model Inspection for Better Understanding Performance Characteristics of Graph Neural Networks [15.569758991934934]
  We investigate the effect of modelling choices on the feature learning characteristics of graph neural networks applied to a brain shape classification task. We find substantial differences in the feature embeddings at different layers of the models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-02T13:26:18Z)
• Towards Causal Foundation Model: on Duality between Causal Inference and Attention [18.046388712804042]
  We take a first step towards building causally-aware foundation models for treatment effect estimations. We propose a novel, theoretically justified method called Causal Inference with Attention (CInA)
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-01T22:28:34Z)
• A Comprehensive Evaluation and Analysis Study for Chinese Spelling Check [53.152011258252315]
  We show that using phonetic and graphic information reasonably is effective for Chinese Spelling Check. Models are sensitive to the error distribution of the test set, which reflects the shortcomings of models. The commonly used benchmark, SIGHAN, can not reliably evaluate models' performance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-07-25T17:02:38Z)
• Consistent Explanations in the Face of Model Indeterminacy via Ensembling [12.661530681518899]
  This work addresses the challenge of providing consistent explanations for predictive models in the presence of model indeterminacy. We introduce ensemble methods to enhance the consistency of the explanations provided in these scenarios. Our findings highlight the importance of considering model indeterminacy when interpreting explanations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-09T18:45:43Z)
• Fairness Increases Adversarial Vulnerability [50.90773979394264]
  This paper shows the existence of a dichotomy between fairness and robustness, and analyzes when achieving fairness decreases the model robustness to adversarial samples. Experiments on non-linear models and different architectures validate the theoretical findings in multiple vision domains. The paper proposes a simple, yet effective, solution to construct models achieving good tradeoffs between fairness and robustness.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-11-21T19:55:35Z)
• Empirical Analysis of Model Selection for Heterogeneous Causal Effect Estimation [24.65301562548798]
  We study the problem of model selection in causal inference, specifically for conditional average treatment effect (CATE) estimation. We conduct an empirical analysis to benchmark the surrogate model selection metrics introduced in the literature, as well as the novel ones introduced in this work.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-11-03T16:26:06Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.