Out-of-Distribution Detection Methods Answer the Wrong Questions

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2507.01831v1
• Date: Wed, 02 Jul 2025 15:45:17 GMT
• Title: Out-of-Distribution Detection Methods Answer the Wrong Questions
• Authors: Yucen Lily Li, Daohan Lu, Polina Kirichenko, Shikai Qiu, Tim G. J. Rudner, C. Bayan Bruss, Andrew Gordon Wilson,
• Abstract summary: Many out-of-distribution (OOD) detection methods rely on the predictive uncertainty or features of supervised models trained on in-distribution data.<n>We find that uncertainty-based methods incorrectly conflate high uncertainty with being OOD, while feature-based methods incorrectly conflate far feature-space distance.<n>We show how these pathologies manifest as irreducible errors in OOD detection and identify common settings where these methods are ineffective.
• Score: 42.28447793943742
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: To detect distribution shifts and improve model safety, many out-of-distribution (OOD) detection methods rely on the predictive uncertainty or features of supervised models trained on in-distribution data. In this paper, we critically re-examine this popular family of OOD detection procedures, and we argue that these methods are fundamentally answering the wrong questions for OOD detection. There is no simple fix to this misalignment, since a classifier trained only on in-distribution classes cannot be expected to identify OOD points; for instance, a cat-dog classifier may confidently misclassify an airplane if it contains features that distinguish cats from dogs, despite generally appearing nothing alike. We find that uncertainty-based methods incorrectly conflate high uncertainty with being OOD, while feature-based methods incorrectly conflate far feature-space distance with being OOD. We show how these pathologies manifest as irreducible errors in OOD detection and identify common settings where these methods are ineffective. Additionally, interventions to improve OOD detection such as feature-logit hybrid methods, scaling of model and data size, epistemic uncertainty representation, and outlier exposure also fail to address this fundamental misalignment in objectives. We additionally consider unsupervised density estimation and generative models for OOD detection, which we show have their own fundamental limitations.

Related papers

• Uncertainty-Aware Out-of-Distribution Detection with Gaussian Processes [13.246251147975192]
  Deep neural networks (DNNs) are often constructed under the closed-world assumption.<n>OOD samples are not always available during the training phase in real-world applications.<n>We propose a Gaussian-process-based OOD detection method to establish a decision boundary based on InD data only.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-12-30T12:57:31Z)
• The Best of Both Worlds: On the Dilemma of Out-of-distribution Detection [75.65876949930258]
  Out-of-distribution (OOD) detection is essential for model trustworthiness. We show that the superior OOD detection performance of state-of-the-art methods is achieved by secretly sacrificing the OOD generalization ability.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-12T07:02:04Z)
• Rethinking Out-of-Distribution Detection on Imbalanced Data Distribution [38.844580833635725]
  We present a training-time regularization technique to mitigate the bias and boost imbalanced OOD detectors across architecture designs. Our method translates into consistent improvements on the representative CIFAR10-LT, CIFAR100-LT, and ImageNet-LT benchmarks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-23T12:28:59Z)
• Revisiting Confidence Estimation: Towards Reliable Failure Prediction [53.79160907725975]
  We find a general, widely existing but actually-neglected phenomenon that most confidence estimation methods are harmful for detecting misclassification errors. We propose to enlarge the confidence gap by finding flat minima, which yields state-of-the-art failure prediction performance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-05T11:44:14Z)
• Beyond AUROC & co. for evaluating out-of-distribution detection performance [50.88341818412508]
  Given their relevance for safe(r) AI, it is important to examine whether the basis for comparing OOD detection methods is consistent with practical needs. We propose a new metric - Area Under the Threshold Curve (AUTC), which explicitly penalizes poor separation between ID and OOD samples.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-26T12:51:32Z)
• Robustness to Spurious Correlations Improves Semantic Out-of-Distribution Detection [24.821151013905865]
  Methods which utilize the outputs or feature representations of predictive models have emerged as promising approaches for out-of-distribution (OOD) detection of image inputs. We provide a possible explanation for SN-OOD detection failures and propose nuisance-aware OOD detection to address them.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-02-08T15:28:33Z)
• Diffusion Denoising Process for Perceptron Bias in Out-of-distribution Detection [67.49587673594276]
  We introduce a new perceptron bias assumption that suggests discriminator models are more sensitive to certain features of the input, leading to the overconfidence problem. We demonstrate that the diffusion denoising process (DDP) of DMs serves as a novel form of asymmetric, which is well-suited to enhance the input and mitigate the overconfidence problem. Our experiments on CIFAR10, CIFAR100, and ImageNet show that our method outperforms SOTA approaches.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-11-21T08:45:08Z)
• Understanding Failures in Out-of-Distribution Detection with Deep Generative Models [22.11487118547924]
  We prove that no method can guarantee performance beyond random chance without assumptions on which out-distributions are relevant. We highlight the consequences implied by assuming support overlap between in- and out-distributions. Our results suggest that estimation error is a more plausible explanation than the misalignment between likelihood-based OOD detection and out-distributions of interest.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-07-14T18:00:11Z)
• Provably Robust Detection of Out-of-distribution Data (almost) for free [124.14121487542613]
  Deep neural networks are known to produce highly overconfident predictions on out-of-distribution (OOD) data. In this paper we propose a novel method where from first principles we combine a certifiable OOD detector with a standard classifier into an OOD aware classifier. In this way we achieve the best of two worlds: certifiably adversarially robust OOD detection, even for OOD samples close to the in-distribution, without loss in prediction accuracy and close to state-of-the-art OOD detection performance for non-manipulated OOD data.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-06-08T11:40:49Z)
• Robust Out-of-distribution Detection for Neural Networks [51.19164318924997]
  We show that existing detection mechanisms can be extremely brittle when evaluating on in-distribution and OOD inputs. We propose an effective algorithm called ALOE, which performs robust training by exposing the model to both adversarially crafted inlier and outlier examples.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-03-21T17:46:28Z)
• Uncertainty-Based Out-of-Distribution Classification in Deep Reinforcement Learning [17.10036674236381]
  Wrong predictions for out-of-distribution data can cause safety critical situations in machine learning systems. We propose a framework for uncertainty-based OOD classification: UBOOD. We show that UBOOD produces reliable classification results when combined with ensemble-based estimators.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2019-12-31T09:52:49Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.