AI Generated Text Detection Using Instruction Fine-tuned Large Language and Transformer-Based Models

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2507.05157v1
• Date: Mon, 07 Jul 2025 16:13:13 GMT
• Title: AI Generated Text Detection Using Instruction Fine-tuned Large Language and Transformer-Based Models
• Authors: Chinnappa Guggilla, Budhaditya Roy, Trupti Ramdas Chavan, Abdul Rahman, Edward Bowen,
• Abstract summary: Large Language Models (LLMs) produce text that is both grammatically correct and semantically meaningful.<n>LLMs have been misused to create highly realistic phishing emails, spread fake news, generate code to automate cyber crime, and write fraudulent scientific articles.<n>Various attempts have been made to distinguish machine-generated text from human-authored content using linguistic, statistical, machine learning, and ensemble-based approaches.
• Score: 0.2796197251957245
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Large Language Models (LLMs) possess an extraordinary capability to produce text that is not only coherent and contextually relevant but also strikingly similar to human writing. They adapt to various styles and genres, producing content that is both grammatically correct and semantically meaningful. Recently, LLMs have been misused to create highly realistic phishing emails, spread fake news, generate code to automate cyber crime, and write fraudulent scientific articles. Additionally, in many real-world applications, the generated content including style and topic and the generator model are not known beforehand. The increasing prevalence and sophistication of artificial intelligence (AI)-generated texts have made their detection progressively more challenging. Various attempts have been made to distinguish machine-generated text from human-authored content using linguistic, statistical, machine learning, and ensemble-based approaches. This work focuses on two primary objectives Task-A, which involves distinguishing human-written text from machine-generated text, and Task-B, which attempts to identify the specific LLM model responsible for the generation. Both of these tasks are based on fine tuning of Generative Pre-trained Transformer (GPT_4o-mini), Large Language Model Meta AI (LLaMA) 3 8B, and Bidirectional Encoder Representations from Transformers (BERT). The fine-tuned version of GPT_4o-mini and the BERT model has achieved accuracies of 0.9547 for Task-A and 0.4698 for Task-B.

Related papers

• AI-generated Text Detection: A Multifaceted Approach to Binary and Multiclass Classification [0.13392361199400257]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) have demonstrated remarkable capabilities in generating text that closely resembles human writing.<n>Such capabilities are prone to potential misuse, such as fake news generation, spam email creation, and misuse in academic assignments.<n>We propose two neural architectures: an optimized model and a simpler variant.<n>For Task A, the optimized neural architecture achieved fifth place with $F1$ score of 0.994, and for Task B, the simpler neural architecture also ranked fifth place with $F1$ score of 0.627.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-15T09:28:06Z)
• Leveraging Explainable AI for LLM Text Attribution: Differentiating Human-Written and Multiple LLMs-Generated Text [1.1137087573421256]
  This study aims to support efforts to detect and identify textual content generated using Generative AI Large Language Models.<n>We leverage several machine learning algorithms such as Random Forest (RF), and Recurrent Neural Networks (RNN) to understand the important features in attribution.<n>Our method is divided into 1) binary classification to differentiate between human-written and AI-text, and 2) multi classification, to differentiate between human-written text and the text generated by the five different LLM tools.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-01-06T18:46:53Z)
• Detecting Machine-Generated Long-Form Content with Latent-Space Variables [54.07946647012579]
  Existing zero-shot detectors primarily focus on token-level distributions, which are vulnerable to real-world domain shifts. We propose a more robust method that incorporates abstract elements, such as event transitions, as key deciding factors to detect machine versus human texts.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-04T18:42:09Z)
• Successor Features for Efficient Multisubject Controlled Text Generation [48.37713738712319]
  We introduce SF-GEN, which is grounded in two primary concepts: successor features (SFs) and language model rectification. SF-GEN seamlessly integrates the two to enable dynamic steering of text generation with no need to alter the LLM's parameters. To the best of our knowledge, our research represents the first application of successor features in text generation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-03T00:17:08Z)
• Generative AI Text Classification using Ensemble LLM Approaches [0.12483023446237698]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) have shown impressive performance across a variety of AI and natural language processing tasks. We propose an ensemble neural model that generates probabilities from different pre-trained LLMs. For the first task of distinguishing between AI and human generated text, our model ranked in fifth and thirteenth place.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-09-14T14:41:46Z)
• FacTool: Factuality Detection in Generative AI -- A Tool Augmented Framework for Multi-Task and Multi-Domain Scenarios [87.12753459582116]
  A wider range of tasks now face an increasing risk of containing factual errors when handled by generative models. We propose FacTool, a task and domain agnostic framework for detecting factual errors of texts generated by large language models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-07-25T14:20:51Z)
• The Imitation Game: Detecting Human and AI-Generated Texts in the Era of ChatGPT and BARD [3.2228025627337864]
  We introduce a novel dataset of human-written and AI-generated texts in different genres. We employ several machine learning models to classify the texts. Results demonstrate the efficacy of these models in discerning between human and AI-generated text.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-07-22T21:00:14Z)
• VioLA: Unified Codec Language Models for Speech Recognition, Synthesis, and Translation [91.39949385661379]
  VioLA is a single auto-regressive Transformer decoder-only network that unifies various cross-modal tasks involving speech and text. We first convert all the speech utterances to discrete tokens using an offline neural encoder. We further integrate task IDs (TID) and language IDs (LID) into the proposed model to enhance the modeling capability of handling different languages and tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-25T14:39:47Z)
• Code-Switching Text Generation and Injection in Mandarin-English ASR [57.57570417273262]
  We investigate text generation and injection for improving the performance of an industry commonly-used streaming model, Transformer-Transducer (T-T) We first propose a strategy to generate code-switching text data and then investigate injecting generated text into T-T model explicitly by Text-To-Speech (TTS) conversion or implicitly by tying speech and text latent spaces. Experimental results on the T-T model trained with a dataset containing 1,800 hours of real Mandarin-English code-switched speech show that our approaches to inject generated code-switching text significantly boost the performance of T-T models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-03-20T09:13:27Z)
• PALM: Pre-training an Autoencoding&Autoregressive Language Model for Context-conditioned Generation [92.7366819044397]
  Self-supervised pre-training has emerged as a powerful technique for natural language understanding and generation. This work presents PALM with a novel scheme that jointly pre-trains an autoencoding and autoregressive language model on a large unlabeled corpus. An extensive set of experiments show that PALM achieves new state-of-the-art results on a variety of language generation benchmarks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-04-14T06:25:36Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.