"Lost-in-the-Later": Framework for Quantifying Contextual Grounding in Large Language Models

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2507.05424v1
• Date: Mon, 07 Jul 2025 19:13:20 GMT
• Title: "Lost-in-the-Later": Framework for Quantifying Contextual Grounding in Large Language Models
• Authors: Yufei Tao, Adam Hiatt, Rahul Seetharaman, Ameeta Agrawal,
• Abstract summary: We introduce CoPE, a novel evaluation framework that measures contextual knowledge across models and languages.<n>We analyze how large language models integrate context, prioritize information, and incorporate PK in open-ended question answering.<n>We find that reasoning models, as well as non-reasoning models prompted with chain-of-thought (CoT), use context even less than non-reasoning models without CoT and fail to mitigate the lost-in-the-later effect.
• Score: 4.712325494028972
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Large language models are capable of leveraging both contextual and parametric knowledge but how they prioritize and integrate these sources remains underexplored. We introduce CoPE, a novel evaluation framework that systematically measures contextual knowledge (CK) and parametric knowledge (PK) across models and languages. Using our MultiWikiAtomic dataset in English, Spanish, and Danish, we analyze how large language models (LLMs) integrate context, prioritize information, and incorporate PK in open-ended question answering. Our analysis uncovers a phenomenon we call lost-in-the-later, where LLMs tend to overlook or deprioritize information that appears later in a given context, revealing a strong positional bias that affects contextual grounding. We further find that reasoning models, as well as non-reasoning models prompted with chain-of-thought (CoT), use context even less than non-reasoning models without CoT and fail to mitigate the lost-in-the-later effect. CoT prompting, in particular, results in lower recall and shorter responses, leading to degraded contextual grounding. Based on these insights, we design prompt-based methods to effectively leverage input context. A case study applying CoPE to summarization demonstrates that CK-informed prompting improves factual grounding and reduces hallucination.

Related papers

• Context-Informed Grounding Supervision [102.11698329887226]
  Context-INformed Grounding Supervision (CINGS) is a post-training supervision in which the model is trained with relevant context prepended to the response.<n>Our experiments demonstrate that models trained with CINGS exhibit stronger grounding in both textual and visual domains.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-18T14:13:56Z)
• Understanding In-Context Machine Translation for Low-Resource Languages: A Case Study on Manchu [53.437954702561065]
  In-context machine translation (MT) with large language models (LLMs) is a promising approach for low-resource MT.<n>This study systematically investigates how each type of resource, e.g., dictionary, grammar book, and retrieved parallel examples, affect the translation performance.<n>Our results indicate that high-quality dictionaries and good parallel examples are very helpful, while grammars hardly help.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-17T14:53:49Z)
• Context is Key: A Benchmark for Forecasting with Essential Textual Information [87.3175915185287]
  "Context is Key" (CiK) is a forecasting benchmark that pairs numerical data with diverse types of carefully crafted textual context.<n>We evaluate a range of approaches, including statistical models, time series foundation models, and LLM-based forecasters.<n>We propose a simple yet effective LLM prompting method that outperforms all other tested methods on our benchmark.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-24T17:56:08Z)
• When Context Leads but Parametric Memory Follows in Large Language Models [4.567122178196834]
  Large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated remarkable progress in leveraging diverse knowledge sources. This study investigates how nine widely used LLMs allocate knowledge between local context and global parameters when answering open-ended questions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-09-13T00:03:19Z)
• Enhancing Contextual Understanding in Large Language Models through Contrastive Decoding [9.2433070542025]
  Large language models (LLMs) tend to inadequately integrate input context during text generation. We introduce a novel approach integrating contrastive decoding with adversarial irrelevant passages as negative samples.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-04T20:38:41Z)
• LLMs' Reading Comprehension Is Affected by Parametric Knowledge and Struggles with Hypothetical Statements [59.71218039095155]
  Task of reading comprehension (RC) provides a primary means to assess language models' natural language understanding (NLU) capabilities.<n>If the context aligns with the models' internal knowledge, it is hard to discern whether the models' answers stem from context comprehension or from internal information.<n>To address this issue, we suggest to use RC on imaginary data, based on fictitious facts and entities.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-09T13:08:56Z)
• A Glitch in the Matrix? Locating and Detecting Language Model Grounding with Fakepedia [57.31074448586854]
  Large language models (LLMs) have an impressive ability to draw on novel information supplied in their context. Yet the mechanisms underlying this contextual grounding remain unknown. We present a novel method to study grounding abilities using Fakepedia.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-12-04T17:35:42Z)
• Large Language Models with Controllable Working Memory [64.71038763708161]
  Large language models (LLMs) have led to a series of breakthroughs in natural language processing (NLP) What further sets these models apart is the massive amounts of world knowledge they internalize during pretraining. How the model's world knowledge interacts with the factual information presented in the context remains under explored.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-11-09T18:58:29Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.