SmartphoneDemocracy: Privacy-Preserving E-Voting on Decentralized Infrastructure using Novel European Identity

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2507.09453v1
• Date: Sun, 13 Jul 2025 02:39:10 GMT
• Title: SmartphoneDemocracy: Privacy-Preserving E-Voting on Decentralized Infrastructure using Novel European Identity
• Authors: Michał Jóźwik, Johan Pouwelse,
• Abstract summary: SmartphoneDemocracy is a novel e-voting protocol that combines three key technologies.<n>Our protocol enables voters to register and cast ballots anonymously and verifiably directly from their smartphones.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: The digitization of democratic processes promises greater accessibility but presents challenges in terms of security, privacy, and verifiability. Existing electronic voting systems often rely on centralized architectures, creating single points of failure and forcing too much trust in authorities, which contradicts democratic principles. This research addresses the challenge of creating a secure, private e-voting system with minimized trust dependencies designed for the most versatile personal device: the smartphone. We introduce SmartphoneDemocracy, a novel e-voting protocol that combines three key technologies: the emerging European Digital Identity (EUDI) Wallet for Sybil-resistant identity verification, Zero-Knowledge Proofs for privacy-preserving validation, and a peer-to-peer blockchain (TrustChain) for a resilient, serverless public bulletin board. Our protocol enables voters to register and cast ballots anonymously and verifiably directly from their smartphones. We provide a detailed protocol design, a security analysis against a defined threat model, and a performance evaluation demonstrating that the computational and network overhead is feasible for medium- to large-scale elections. By developing and prototyping this system, we demonstrate a viable path to empower citizens with a trustworthy, accessible, and user-controlled digital voting experience.

Related papers

• Your Privacy Depends on Others: Collusion Vulnerabilities in Individual Differential Privacy [50.66105844449181]
  Individual Differential Privacy (iDP) promises users control over their privacy, but this promise can be broken in practice.<n>We reveal a previously overlooked vulnerability in sampling-based iDP mechanisms.<n>We propose $(varepsilon_i,_i,overline)$-iDP a privacy contract that uses $$-divergences to provide users with a hard upper bound on their excess vulnerability.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-19T10:26:12Z)
• Are Voters Willing to Collectively Secure Elections? Unraveling a Practical Blockchain Voting System [0.0]
  This paper proposes the concept of collectively secure voting, in which voters themselves can opt in as secret holders to protect ballot secrecy.<n>A practical blockchain-based collectively secure voting system is designed and implemented.<n>Results show a high willingness to act as secret holders, reliable participation in share release, and high security confidence in the proposed system.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-09T18:02:40Z)
• Blockchain-Based Secure Online Voting Platform Ensuring Voter Anonymity, Integrity, and End-to-End Verifiability [0.0]
  This paper proposes a hybrid blockchain-based voting model that stores encrypted votes on a private blockchain maintained by election organizers and neutral observers.<n>The system issues voters one-time blind-signed tokens to protect anonymity, and provides receipts so they can confirm their vote.<n>This research highlights the feasibility of secure, verifiable, and scalable online voting for organizations ranging from small groups to larger institutions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-09-26T21:58:52Z)
• Inference Attacks on Encrypted Online Voting via Traffic Analysis [19.653420340564946]
  We examine how adversaries can exploit metadata from encrypted network traffic to uncover sensitive information during online voting.<n>Our analysis reveals that, even without accessing the content, it is possible to infer critical voter actions, such as whether a person votes, the exact moment a ballot is submitted, and whether the ballot is valid or spoiled.<n>We evaluate our attacks on two widely used online voting platforms, one proprietary and one partially open source, achieving classification accuracy as high as 99.5%.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-09-19T07:14:01Z)
• Zero-Trust Foundation Models: A New Paradigm for Secure and Collaborative Artificial Intelligence for Internet of Things [61.43014629640404]
  Zero-Trust Foundation Models (ZTFMs) embed zero-trust security principles into the lifecycle of foundation models (FMs) for Internet of Things (IoT) systems.<n>ZTFMs can enable secure, privacy-preserving AI across distributed, heterogeneous, and potentially adversarial IoT environments.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-26T06:44:31Z)
• VoteMate: A Decentralized Application for Scalable Electronic Voting on EVM-Based Blockchain [1.7034813545878589]
  A single vulnerability could be exploited to manipulate elections on a large scale.<n>System can be secure but may lack transparency and confidentiality.<n>Adding cryptographic layers can also ensure voter confidentiality.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-21T17:50:18Z)
• How Malicious AI Swarms Can Threaten Democracy [42.60750455396757]
  Malicious AI swarms can coordinate covertly, infiltrate communities, evade traditional detectors, and run continuous A/B tests.<n>The result can include fabricated grassroots consensus, fragmented shared reality, mass harassment, voter micro-suppression or mobilization.<n>We urge a three-pronged response: always-on swarm-detection dashboards, pre-election high-fidelity swarm-simulation stress-tests, transparency audits, and optional client-side "AI shields" for users.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-18T13:33:37Z)
• A New Era of Elections: Leveraging Blockchain for Fair and Transparent Voting [6.895563531851402]
  This study presents a blockchain-based voting system aimed at enhancing election security, transparency, and integrity.<n>Our proposed system combines blockchain's immutable, decentralized ledger with advanced voter identity verification techniques.<n>Security analysis indicates that this multi-layered approach significantly reduces impersonation risks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-22T07:45:08Z)
• Balancing Confidentiality and Transparency for Blockchain-based Process-Aware Information Systems [46.404531555921906]
  We propose an architecture for blockchain-based PAISs aimed at preserving both confidentiality and transparency.<n>Smart contracts enact, enforce and store public interactions, while attribute-based encryption techniques are adopted to specify access grants to confidential information.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-12-07T20:18:36Z)
• Quantum digital signature based on single-qubit without a trusted third-party [45.41082277680607]
  We propose a novel quantum digital signature protocol without a trusted third-party.<n>We prove that the protocol has information-theoretical unforgeability.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-17T09:49:29Z)
• Blockchain based Decentralized Petition System [0.7312229214872543]
  A decentralized online petition system enables individuals or groups to create, sign, and share petitions without a central authority. We propose a decentralized voting system web application using blockchain technology to ensure the integrity and security of the voting process. Our research aims to enhance the integrity and accessibility of democratic processes, improve security, and ensure fairness, transparency, and tamper-proofness.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-29T21:44:35Z)
• Towards Credential-based Device Registration in DApps for DePINs with ZKPs [46.08150780379237]
  We propose a credential-based device registration (CDR) mechanism that verifies device credentials on the blockchain. We present a general system model, and technically evaluate CDR using zkSNARKs with Groth16 and Marlin.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-27T09:50:10Z)
• Enhancing Trust and Privacy in Distributed Networks: A Comprehensive Survey on Blockchain-based Federated Learning [51.13534069758711]
  Decentralized approaches like blockchain offer a compelling solution by implementing a consensus mechanism among multiple entities. Federated Learning (FL) enables participants to collaboratively train models while safeguarding data privacy. This paper investigates the synergy between blockchain's security features and FL's privacy-preserving model training capabilities.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-28T07:08:26Z)
• Combining Decentralized IDentifiers with Proof of Membership to Enable Trust in IoT Networks [44.99833362998488]
  The paper proposes and discusses an alternative (mutual) authentication process for IoT nodes under the same administration domain. The main idea is to combine the Decentralized IDentifier (DID)-based verification of private key ownership with the verification of a proof that the DID belongs to an evolving trusted set.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-12T09:33:50Z)
• AI and Democracy's Digital Identity Crisis [0.0]
  Privacy-preserving identity attestations can drastically reduce instances of impersonation and make disinformation easy to identify and potentially hinder. In this paper, we discuss attestation types, including governmental, biometric, federated, and web of trust-based. We believe these systems could be the best approach to authenticating identity and protecting against some of the threats to democracy that AI can pose in the hands of malicious actors.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-09-25T14:15:18Z)
• Secure Order Based Voting Using Distributed Tallying [5.407319151576265]
  One of the main challenges in e-voting systems is to certify that the computed results are consistent with the cast ballots.<n>We propose a secure voting protocol for elections governed by order-based voting rules.<n>Our protocol, in which the tallying task is distributed among several independent talliers, offers perfect ballot secrecy.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-05-21T12:17:21Z)
• Privacy and Robustness in Federated Learning: Attacks and Defenses [74.62641494122988]
  We conduct the first comprehensive survey on this topic. Through a concise introduction to the concept of FL, and a unique taxonomy covering: 1) threat models; 2) poisoning attacks and defenses against robustness; 3) inference attacks and defenses against privacy, we provide an accessible review of this important topic.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-12-07T12:11:45Z)
• Identity and Personhood in Digital Democracy: Evaluating Inclusion, Equality, Security, and Privacy in Pseudonym Parties and Other Proofs of Personhood [1.3833241949666322]
  ID checking, biometrics, self-sovereign identity, and trust networks all present flaws. These flaws may be insurmountable because digital identity is a cart pulling the horse. We explore alternative approaches to "proof of personhood" that may provide this missing foundation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-11-04T17:08:54Z)
• Decentralized Privacy-Preserving Proximity Tracing [50.27258414960402]
  DP3T provides a technological foundation to help slow the spread of SARS-CoV-2. System aims to minimise privacy and security risks for individuals and communities.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-05-25T12:32:02Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.