A Kernel Distribution Closeness Testing

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2507.12843v1
• Date: Thu, 17 Jul 2025 07:08:54 GMT
• Title: A Kernel Distribution Closeness Testing
• Authors: Zhijian Zhou, Liuhua Peng, Xunye Tian, Feng Liu,
• Abstract summary: The distribution closeness testing (DCT) assesses whether the distance between a distribution pair is at least $epsilon$-far.<n>Existing DCT methods mainly measure discrepancies between a distribution pair defined on discrete one-dimensional spaces.<n>We introduce maximum mean discrepancy (MMD), a powerful measurement of the distributional discrepancy between two complex distributions.
• Score: 4.435730822138841
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: The distribution closeness testing (DCT) assesses whether the distance between a distribution pair is at least $\epsilon$-far. Existing DCT methods mainly measure discrepancies between a distribution pair defined on discrete one-dimensional spaces (e.g., using total variation), which limits their applications to complex data (e.g., images). To extend DCT to more types of data, a natural idea is to introduce maximum mean discrepancy (MMD), a powerful measurement of the distributional discrepancy between two complex distributions, into DCT scenarios. However, we find that MMD's value can be the same for many pairs of distributions that have different norms in the same reproducing kernel Hilbert space (RKHS), making MMD less informative when assessing the closeness levels for multiple distribution pairs. To mitigate the issue, we design a new measurement of distributional discrepancy, norm-adaptive MMD (NAMMD), which scales MMD's value using the RKHS norms of distributions. Based on the asymptotic distribution of NAMMD, we finally propose the NAMMD-based DCT to assess the closeness levels of a distribution pair. Theoretically, we prove that NAMMD-based DCT has higher test power compared to MMD-based DCT, with bounded type-I error, which is also validated by extensive experiments on many types of data (e.g., synthetic noise, real images). Furthermore, we also apply the proposed NAMMD for addressing the two-sample testing problem and find NAMMD-based two-sample test has higher test power than the MMD-based two-sample test in both theory and experiments.

Related papers

• An Efficient Permutation-Based Kernel Two-Sample Test [13.229867216847534]
  Two-sample hypothesis testing is a fundamental problem in statistics and machine learning.<n>In this work, we use a Nystr"om approximation of the maximum mean discrepancy (MMD) to design a computationally efficient and practical testing algorithm.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-19T09:22:48Z)
• Multi-Source and Test-Time Domain Adaptation on Multivariate Signals using Spatio-Temporal Monge Alignment [59.75420353684495]
  Machine learning applications on signals such as computer vision or biomedical data often face challenges due to the variability that exists across hardware devices or session recordings. In this work, we propose Spatio-Temporal Monge Alignment (STMA) to mitigate these variabilities. We show that STMA leads to significant and consistent performance gains between datasets acquired with very different settings.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-19T13:33:38Z)
• A Uniform Concentration Inequality for Kernel-Based Two-Sample Statistics [4.757470449749877]
  We show that these metrics can be unified under a general framework of kernel-based two-sample statistics.<n>This paper establishes a novel uniform concentration inequality for the aforementioned kernel-based statistics.<n>As illustrative applications, we demonstrate how these bounds facilitate the component of error bounds for procedures such as distance covariance-based dimension reduction.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-22T22:41:56Z)
• Partial identification of kernel based two sample tests with mismeasured data [5.076419064097733]
  Two-sample tests such as the Maximum Mean Discrepancy (MMD) are often used to detect differences between two distributions in machine learning applications. We study the estimation of the MMD under $epsilon$-contamination, where a possibly non-random $epsilon$ proportion of one distribution is erroneously grouped with the other. We propose a method to estimate these bounds, and show that it gives estimates that converge to the sharpest possible bounds on the MMD as sample size increases.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-08-07T13:21:58Z)
• MMD-FUSE: Learning and Combining Kernels for Two-Sample Testing Without Data Splitting [28.59390881834003]
  We propose novel statistics which maximise the power of a two-sample test based on the Maximum Mean Discrepancy (MMD) We show how these kernels can be chosen in a data-dependent but permutation-independent way, in a well-calibrated test, avoiding data splitting. We highlight the applicability of our MMD-FUSE test on both synthetic low-dimensional and real-world high-dimensional data, and compare its performance in terms of power against current state-of-the-art kernel tests.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-14T23:13:03Z)
• Spectral Regularized Kernel Two-Sample Tests [7.915420897195129]
  We show the popular MMD (maximum mean discrepancy) two-sample test to be not optimal in terms of the separation boundary measured in Hellinger distance. We propose a modification to the MMD test based on spectral regularization and prove the proposed test to be minimax optimal with a smaller separation boundary than that achieved by the MMD test. Our results hold for the permutation variant of the test where the test threshold is chosen elegantly through the permutation of the samples.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-12-19T00:42:21Z)
• Targeted Separation and Convergence with Kernel Discrepancies [61.973643031360254]
  kernel-based discrepancy measures are required to (i) separate a target P from other probability measures or (ii) control weak convergence to P.<n>In this article we derive new sufficient and necessary conditions to ensure (i) and (ii)<n>For MMDs on separable metric spaces, we characterize those kernels that separate Bochner embeddable measures and introduce simple conditions for separating all measures with unbounded kernels.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-09-26T16:41:16Z)
• Federated Deep AUC Maximization for Heterogeneous Data with a Constant Communication Complexity [77.78624443410216]
  We propose improved FDAM algorithms for detecting heterogeneous chest data. A result of this paper is that the communication of the proposed algorithm is strongly independent of the number of machines and also independent of the accuracy level. Experiments have demonstrated the effectiveness of our FDAM algorithm on benchmark datasets and on medical chest Xray images from different organizations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-02-09T04:05:19Z)
• Maximum Mean Discrepancy Test is Aware of Adversarial Attacks [122.51040127438324]
  The maximum mean discrepancy (MMD) test could in principle detect any distributional discrepancy between two datasets. It has been shown that the MMD test is unaware of adversarial attacks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-10-22T03:42:12Z)
• Learning to Match Distributions for Domain Adaptation [116.14838935146004]
  This paper proposes Learning to Match (L2M) to automatically learn the cross-domain distribution matching. L2M reduces the inductive bias by using a meta-network to learn the distribution matching loss in a data-driven way. Experiments on public datasets substantiate the superiority of L2M over SOTA methods.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-07-17T03:26:13Z)
• Rethink Maximum Mean Discrepancy for Domain Adaptation [77.2560592127872]
  This paper theoretically proves two essential facts: 1) minimizing the Maximum Mean Discrepancy equals to maximize the source and target intra-class distances respectively but jointly minimize their variance with some implicit weights, so that the feature discriminability degrades. Experiments on several benchmark datasets not only prove the validity of theoretical results but also demonstrate that our approach could perform better than the comparative state-of-art methods substantially.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-07-01T18:25:10Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.