Evaluating the Effectiveness of Cost-Efficient Large Language Models in Benchmark Biomedical Tasks

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2507.14045v1
• Date: Fri, 18 Jul 2025 16:13:35 GMT
• Title: Evaluating the Effectiveness of Cost-Efficient Large Language Models in Benchmark Biomedical Tasks
• Authors: Israt Jahan, Md Tahmid Rahman Laskar, Chun Peng, Jimmy Huang,
• Abstract summary: This paper presents a comprehensive evaluation of cost-efficient Large Language Models (LLMs)<n>We evaluated a range of closed-source and open-source LLMs on tasks such as biomedical text classification and generation, question answering, and multimodal image processing.<n>Our experimental results offer valuable insights for selecting models that are optimally suited for specific biomedical applications.
• Score: 2.290986589177405
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: This paper presents a comprehensive evaluation of cost-efficient Large Language Models (LLMs) for diverse biomedical tasks spanning both text and image modalities. We evaluated a range of closed-source and open-source LLMs on tasks such as biomedical text classification and generation, question answering, and multimodal image processing. Our experimental findings indicate that there is no single LLM that can consistently outperform others across all tasks. Instead, different LLMs excel in different tasks. While some closed-source LLMs demonstrate strong performance on specific tasks, their open-source counterparts achieve comparable results (sometimes even better), with additional benefits like faster inference and enhanced privacy. Our experimental results offer valuable insights for selecting models that are optimally suited for specific biomedical applications.

Related papers

• LLMs as Data Annotators: How Close Are We to Human Performance [47.61698665650761]
  Manual annotation of data is labor-intensive, time-consuming, and costly.<n>In-context learning (ICL) in which some examples related to the task are given in the prompt can lead to inefficiencies and suboptimal model performance.<n>This paper presents experiments comparing several LLMs, considering different embedding models, across various datasets for the Named Entity Recognition (NER) task.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-21T11:11:07Z)
• P-MMEval: A Parallel Multilingual Multitask Benchmark for Consistent Evaluation of LLMs [84.24644520272835]
  We introduce P-MMEval, a large-scale benchmark covering effective fundamental and capability-specialized datasets.<n>P-MMEval delivers consistent language coverage across various datasets and provides parallel samples.<n>We conduct extensive experiments on representative multilingual model series to compare performances across models and tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-14T01:29:36Z)
• Leveraging Large Language Models for Medical Information Extraction and Query Generation [2.1793134762413433]
  This paper introduces a system that integrates large language models (LLMs) into the clinical trial retrieval process. We evaluate six LLMs for query generation, focusing on open-source and relatively small models that require minimal computational resources.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-31T12:01:51Z)
• Mitigating Hallucinations of Large Language Models in Medical Information Extraction via Contrastive Decoding [92.32881381717594]
  We introduce ALternate Contrastive Decoding (ALCD) to solve hallucination issues in medical information extraction tasks. ALCD demonstrates significant improvements in resolving hallucination issues compared to conventional decoding methods.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-21T07:19:19Z)
• EVOLvE: Evaluating and Optimizing LLMs For In-Context Exploration [76.66831821738927]
  Large language models (LLMs) remain under-studied in scenarios requiring optimal decision-making under uncertainty.<n>We measure LLMs' (in)ability to make optimal decisions in bandits, a state-less reinforcement learning setting relevant to many applications.<n>Motivated by the existence of optimal exploration algorithms, we propose efficient ways to integrate this algorithmic knowledge into LLMs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-08T17:54:03Z)
• LLMs are not Zero-Shot Reasoners for Biomedical Information Extraction [13.965777046473885]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) are increasingly adopted for applications in healthcare.<n>They reach the performance of domain experts on tasks such as question answering and document summarisation.<n>It is unclear how well LLMs perform on tasks that are traditionally pursued in the biomedical domain.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-22T09:37:40Z)
• SELF-GUIDE: Better Task-Specific Instruction Following via Self-Synthetic Finetuning [70.21358720599821]
  Large language models (LLMs) hold the promise of solving diverse tasks when provided with appropriate natural language prompts. We propose SELF-GUIDE, a multi-stage mechanism in which we synthesize task-specific input-output pairs from the student LLM. We report an absolute improvement of approximately 15% for classification tasks and 18% for generation tasks in the benchmark's metrics.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-16T04:41:58Z)
• An Evaluation of Large Language Models in Bioinformatics Research [52.100233156012756]
  We study the performance of large language models (LLMs) on a wide spectrum of crucial bioinformatics tasks. These tasks include the identification of potential coding regions, extraction of named entities for genes and proteins, detection of antimicrobial and anti-cancer peptides, molecular optimization, and resolution of educational bioinformatics problems. Our findings indicate that, given appropriate prompts, LLMs like GPT variants can successfully handle most of these tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-21T11:27:31Z)
• Taiyi: A Bilingual Fine-Tuned Large Language Model for Diverse Biomedical Tasks [19.091278630792615]
  Most existing biomedical large language models (LLMs) focus on enhancing performance in monolingual biomedical question answering and conversation tasks. We present Taiyi, a bilingual fine-tuned LLM for diverse biomedical tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-20T08:51:30Z)
• A Comprehensive Evaluation of Large Language Models on Benchmark Biomedical Text Processing Tasks [2.5027382653219155]
  This paper aims to evaluate the performance of Large Language Models (LLM) on benchmark biomedical tasks. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first work that conducts an extensive evaluation and comparison of various LLMs in the biomedical domain.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-06T14:16:28Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.