A first look at License Variants in the PyPI Ecosystem

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2507.14594v1
• Date: Sat, 19 Jul 2025 12:41:33 GMT
• Title: A first look at License Variants in the PyPI Ecosystem
• Authors: Weiwei Xu, Hengzhi Ye, Kai Gao, Minghui Zhou,
• Abstract summary: We conduct an empirical study of license variants in the PyPI ecosystem.<n>We introduce LV-, a novel approach for efficient license variant analysis leveraging diff-based techniques and large language models.<n> LV- achieves an accuracy of 0.936 while reducing computational costs by 30%, and LV-Compat identifies 5.2 times more incompatible packages than existing methods with a precision of 0.98.
• Score: 22.01881122680886
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
• Abstract: Open-source licenses establish the legal foundation for software reuse, yet license variants, including both modified standard licenses and custom-created alternatives, introduce significant compliance complexities. Despite their prevalence and potential impact, these variants are poorly understood in modern software systems, and existing tools do not account for their existence, leading to significant challenges in both effectiveness and efficiency of license analysis. To fill this knowledge gap, we conduct a comprehensive empirical study of license variants in the PyPI ecosystem. Our findings show that textual variations in licenses are common, yet only 2% involve substantive modifications. However, these license variants lead to significant compliance issues, with 10.7% of their downstream dependencies found to be license-incompatible. Inspired by our findings, we introduce LV-Parser, a novel approach for efficient license variant analysis leveraging diff-based techniques and large language models, along with LV-Compat, an automated pipeline for detecting license incompatibilities in software dependency networks. Our evaluation demonstrates that LV-Parser achieves an accuracy of 0.936 while reducing computational costs by 30%, and LV-Compat identifies 5.2 times more incompatible packages than existing methods with a precision of 0.98. This work not only provides the first empirical study into license variants in software packaging ecosystem but also equips developers and organizations with practical tools for navigating the complex landscape of open-source licensing.

Related papers

• Verifying the Verifiers: Unveiling Pitfalls and Potentials in Fact Verifiers [59.168391398830515]
  We evaluate 12 pre-trained LLMs and one specialized fact-verifier, using a collection of examples from 14 fact-checking benchmarks.<n>We highlight the importance of addressing annotation errors and ambiguity in datasets.<n> frontier LLMs with few-shot in-context examples, often overlooked in previous works, achieve top-tier performance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-16T10:32:10Z)
• Are You Getting What You Pay For? Auditing Model Substitution in LLM APIs [60.881609323604685]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) accessed via black-box APIs introduce a trust challenge.<n>Users pay for services based on advertised model capabilities.<n> providers may covertly substitute the specified model with a cheaper, lower-quality alternative to reduce operational costs.<n>This lack of transparency undermines fairness, erodes trust, and complicates reliable benchmarking.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-07T03:57:41Z)
• Do Not Trust Licenses You See: Dataset Compliance Requires Massive-Scale AI-Powered Lifecycle Tracing [45.6582862121583]
  This paper argues that a dataset's legal risk cannot be accurately assessed by its license terms alone.<n>It argues that tracking dataset redistribution and its full lifecycle is essential.<n>We show that AI can perform these tasks with higher accuracy, efficiency, and cost-effectiveness than human experts.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-04T16:57:53Z)
• The Dual-use Dilemma in LLMs: Do Empowering Ethical Capacities Make a Degraded Utility? [54.18519360412294]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) must balance between rejecting harmful requests for safety and accommodating legitimate ones for utility.<n>This paper presents a Direct Preference Optimization (DPO) based alignment framework that achieves better overall performance.<n>We analyze experimental results obtained from testing DeepSeek-R1 on our benchmark and reveal the critical ethical concerns raised by this highly acclaimed model.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-01-20T06:35:01Z)
• The Impact of SBOM Generators on Vulnerability Assessment in Python: A Comparison and a Novel Approach [56.4040698609393]
  Software Bill of Materials (SBOM) has been promoted as a tool to increase transparency and verifiability in software composition. Current SBOM generation tools often suffer from inaccuracies in identifying components and dependencies. We propose PIP-sbom, a novel pip-inspired solution that addresses their shortcomings.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-09-10T10:12:37Z)
• OSS License Identification at Scale: A Comprehensive Dataset Using World of Code [4.954816514146113]
  This study presents a reusable and comprehensive dataset of open source software (OSS) licenses.<n>We found and identified 5.5 million distinct license blobs in OSS projects.<n>The dataset is open, providing a valuable resource for developers, researchers, and legal professionals in the OSS community.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-09-07T13:34:55Z)
• Catch the Butterfly: Peeking into the Terms and Conflicts among SPDX Licenses [16.948633594354412]
  Third-party libraries (TPLs) in software development has accelerated the creation of modern software. Developers may inadvertently violate the licenses of TPLs, leading to legal issues. There is a need for a high-quality license dataset that encompasses a broad range of mainstream licenses.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-01-19T11:27:34Z)
• LiSum: Open Source Software License Summarization with Multi-Task Learning [16.521420821183995]
  Open source software (OSS) licenses regulate the conditions under which users can reuse, modify, and distribute the software legally. There exist various OSS licenses in the community, written in a formal language, which are typically long and complicated to understand. Motivated by the user study and the fast growth of licenses in the community, we propose the first study towards automated license summarization.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-09-10T16:43:51Z)
• Understanding and Remediating Open-Source License Incompatibilities in the PyPI Ecosystem [29.898303568884227]
  We conduct a large-scale empirical study of license incompatibilities and their remediation practices in the PyPI ecosystem. We propose SILENCE, an SMT-solver-based approach to recommend license incompatibility remediations with minimal costs in package dependency graph.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-08-11T04:57:54Z)
• LiResolver: License Incompatibility Resolution for Open Source Software [13.28021004336228]
  LiResolver is a fine-grained, scalable, and flexible tool to resolve license incompatibility issues for open source software. Comprehensive experiments demonstrate the effectiveness of LiResolver, with 4.09% false positive (FP) rate and 0.02% false negative (FN) rate for incompatibility issue localization.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-26T13:16:09Z)
• Enabling certification of verification-agnostic networks via memory-efficient semidefinite programming [97.40955121478716]
  We propose a first-order dual SDP algorithm that requires memory only linear in the total number of network activations. We significantly improve L-inf verified robust accuracy from 1% to 88% and 6% to 40% respectively. We also demonstrate tight verification of a quadratic stability specification for the decoder of a variational autoencoder.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-10-22T12:32:29Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.