HW-MLVQA: Elucidating Multilingual Handwritten Document Understanding with a Comprehensive VQA Benchmark

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2507.15655v1
• Date: Mon, 21 Jul 2025 14:16:44 GMT
• Title: HW-MLVQA: Elucidating Multilingual Handwritten Document Understanding with a Comprehensive VQA Benchmark
• Authors: Aniket Pal, Ajoy Mondal, Minesh Mathew, C. V. Jawahar,
• Abstract summary: This article delineates HW-MLVQA, an avant-garde VQA benchmark meticulously crafted to mitigate the dearth of authentic Handwritten document comprehension.<n>It provides a robust benchmark evaluation framework spanning three distinct modalities: text, image, and an integrated image & text modality.
• Score: 31.753044906301664
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
• Abstract: The proliferation of MultiLingual Visual Question Answering (MLVQA) benchmarks augments the capabilities of large language models (LLMs) and multi-modal LLMs, thereby enabling them to adeptly capture the intricate linguistic subtleties and visual complexities inherent across diverse languages. Despite its potential, the current MLVQA model struggles to fully utilize its capabilities when dealing with the extensive variety of handwritten documents. This article delineates HW-MLVQA, an avant-garde VQA benchmark meticulously crafted to mitigate the dearth of authentic Multilingual Handwritten document comprehension. HW-MLVQA encompasses an extensive collection of 1,600 handwritten Pages complemented by 2,400 question-answers. Furthermore, it provides a robust benchmark evaluation framework spanning three distinct modalities: text, image, and an integrated image & text modality. To simulate authentic real-world contexts devoid of ground truth textual transcriptions, we facilitates a rigorous assessment of proprietary and open-source OCR models. The benchmark aspires to facilitate pivotal advancements in multilingual handwritten document interpretation, fostering innovation and scholarly inquiry within this specialized domain.

Related papers

• Multimodal Evaluation of Russian-language Architectures [88.00147763684451]
  We introduce Mera Multi, an open multimodal evaluation framework for Russian-spoken architectures.<n>The benchmark is instruction-based and encompasses default text, image, audio, and video modalities.<n>Mera Multi provides a replicable methodology for constructing multimodal benchmarks in typologically diverse languages.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-11-19T15:43:53Z)
• VisR-Bench: An Empirical Study on Visual Retrieval-Augmented Generation for Multilingual Long Document Understanding [49.07705729597171]
  VisR-Bench is a benchmark for question-driven multimodal retrieval in long documents.<n>Our benchmark comprises over 35K high-quality QA pairs across 1.2K documents.<n>We evaluate various retrieval models, including text-based methods, multimodal encoders, and MLLMs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-08-10T21:44:43Z)
• Benchmarking Multimodal Understanding and Complex Reasoning for ESG Tasks [56.350173737493215]
  Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) reports are essential for evaluating sustainability practices, ensuring regulatory compliance, and promoting financial transparency.<n>MMESGBench is a first-of-its-kind benchmark dataset to evaluate multimodal understanding and complex reasoning across structurally diverse and multi-source ESG documents.<n>MMESGBench comprises 933 validated QA pairs derived from 45 ESG documents, spanning across seven distinct document types and three major ESG source categories.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-07-25T03:58:07Z)
• Benchmarking Retrieval-Augmented Generation in Multi-Modal Contexts [56.7225771305861]
  This paper introduces Multi-Modal Retrieval-Augmented Generation (M$2$RAG), a benchmark designed to evaluate the effectiveness of Multi-modal Large Language Models.<n>The benchmark comprises four tasks: image captioning, multi-modal question answering, multi-modal fact verification, and image reranking.<n>To enhance the context utilization capabilities of MLLMs, we also introduce Multi-Modal Retrieval-Augmented Instruction Tuning (MM-RAIT)
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-24T16:25:25Z)
• SimpleVQA: Multimodal Factuality Evaluation for Multimodal Large Language Models [38.739880143262845]
  We introduce SimpleVQA, the first comprehensive benchmark to evaluate the factuality ability of MLLMs to answer natural language short questions.<n>SimpleVQA is characterized by six key features: it covers multiple tasks and multiple scenarios, ensures high quality and challenging queries, maintains static and timeless reference answers, and is straightforward to evaluate.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-18T17:04:26Z)
• VisDoM: Multi-Document QA with Visually Rich Elements Using Multimodal Retrieval-Augmented Generation [100.06122876025063]
  This paper introduces VisDoMBench, the first comprehensive benchmark designed to evaluate QA systems in multi-document settings.<n>We propose VisDoMRAG, a novel multimodal Retrieval Augmented Generation (RAG) approach that simultaneously utilizes visual and textual RAG.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-12-14T06:24:55Z)
• FTII-Bench: A Comprehensive Multimodal Benchmark for Flow Text with Image Insertion [7.322448493179106]
  Flow Text with Image Insertion task requires LVLMs to simultaneously possess outstanding abilities in image comprehension, instruction understanding, and long-text interpretation. We introduce the Flow Text with Image Insertion Benchmark (FTII-Bench), which includes 318 high-quality Chinese image-text news articles and 307 high-quality English image-text news articles, covering 10 different news domains. We evaluate 9 open-source and 2 closed-source LVLMs as well as 2 CLIP-based models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-16T13:38:31Z)
• Benchmarking Large Language Models for Conversational Question Answering in Multi-instructional Documents [61.41316121093604]
  We present InsCoQA, a novel benchmark for evaluating large language models (LLMs) in the context of conversational question answering (CQA) Sourced from extensive, encyclopedia-style instructional content, InsCoQA assesses models on their ability to retrieve, interpret, and accurately summarize procedural guidance from multiple documents. We also propose InsEval, an LLM-assisted evaluator that measures the integrity and accuracy of generated responses and procedural instructions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-01T09:10:00Z)
• Needle In A Multimodal Haystack [79.81804334634408]
  We present the first benchmark specifically designed to evaluate the capability of existing MLLMs to comprehend long multimodal documents. Our benchmark includes three types of evaluation tasks: multimodal retrieval, counting, and reasoning. We observe that existing models still have significant room for improvement on these tasks, especially on vision-centric evaluation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-11T13:09:16Z)
• OCRBench: On the Hidden Mystery of OCR in Large Multimodal Models [122.27878464009181]
  We conducted a comprehensive evaluation of Large Multimodal Models, such as GPT4V and Gemini, in various text-related visual tasks. OCRBench contains 29 datasets, making it the most comprehensive OCR evaluation benchmark available.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-13T11:28:37Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.