Language Detection by Means of the Minkowski Norm: Identification Through Character Bigrams and Frequency Analysis

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2507.16284v2
• Date: Wed, 23 Jul 2025 10:23:20 GMT
• Title: Language Detection by Means of the Minkowski Norm: Identification Through Character Bigrams and Frequency Analysis
• Authors: Paul-Andrei Pogăcean, Sanda-Maria Avram,
• Abstract summary: This research explores a mathematical implementation of an algorithm for language determinism by leveraging monograms and bigrams frequency rankings.<n>The method achieves over 80% accuracy on texts shorter than 150 characters and reaches 100% accuracy for longer texts.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: The debate surrounding language identification has gained renewed attention in recent years, especially with the rapid evolution of AI-powered language models. However, the non-AI-based approaches to language identification have been overshadowed. This research explores a mathematical implementation of an algorithm for language determinism by leveraging monograms and bigrams frequency rankings derived from established linguistic research. The datasets used comprise texts varying in length, historical period, and genre, including short stories, fairy tales, and poems. Despite these variations, the method achieves over 80\% accuracy on texts shorter than 150 characters and reaches 100\% accuracy for longer texts. These results demonstrate that classical frequency-based approaches remain effective and scalable alternatives to AI-driven models for language detection.

Related papers

• Adapting Multilingual Embedding Models to Historical Luxembourgish [5.474797258314828]
  This study examines multilingual embeddings for cross-lingual semantic search in historical Luxembourgish.<n>We use GPT-4o for sentence segmentation and translation, generating 20,000 parallel training sentences per language pair.<n>We adapt several multilingual embedding models through contrastive learning or knowledge distillation and increase accuracy significantly for all models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-11T20:35:29Z)
• Who Writes the Review, Human or AI? [0.36498648388765503]
  This study proposes a methodology to accurately distinguish AI-generated and human-written book reviews. Our approach utilizes transfer learning, enabling the model to identify generated text across different topics. The experimental results demonstrate that it is feasible to detect the original source of text, achieving an accuracy rate of 96.86%.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-30T17:38:44Z)
• MENTOR: Multilingual tExt detectioN TOward leaRning by analogy [59.37382045577384]
  We propose a framework to detect and identify both seen and unseen language regions inside scene images. "MENTOR" is the first work to realize a learning strategy between zero-shot learning and few-shot learning for multilingual scene text detection.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-12T03:35:17Z)
• Retrieval is Accurate Generation [99.24267226311157]
  We introduce a novel method that selects context-aware phrases from a collection of supporting documents. Our model achieves the best performance and the lowest latency among several retrieval-augmented baselines.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-27T14:16:19Z)
• Deep dive into language traits of AI-generated Abstracts [5.209583971923267]
  Generative language models, such as ChatGPT, have garnered attention for their ability to generate human-like writing. In this work, we attempt to detect the Abstracts generated by ChatGPT, which are much shorter in length and bounded. We extract the texts semantic and lexical properties and observe that traditional machine learning models can confidently detect these Abstracts.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-12-17T06:03:33Z)
• Beyond Turing: A Comparative Analysis of Approaches for Detecting Machine-Generated Text [1.919654267936118]
  Traditional shallow learning, Language Model (LM) fine-tuning, and Multilingual Model fine-tuning are evaluated. Results reveal considerable differences in performance across methods. This study paves the way for future research aimed at creating robust and highly discriminative models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-21T06:23:38Z)
• A Transfer Learning Based Model for Text Readability Assessment in German [4.550811027560416]
  We propose a new model for text complexity assessment for German text based on transfer learning. Best model is based on the BERT pre-trained language model achieved the Root Mean Square Error (RMSE) of 0.483.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-07-13T15:15:44Z)
• Exploiting Language Model for Efficient Linguistic Steganalysis: An Empirical Study [23.311007481830647]
  We present two methods to efficient linguistic steganalysis. One is to pre-train a language model based on RNN, and the other is to pre-train a sequence autoencoder.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-07-26T12:37:18Z)
• Sentiment analysis in tweets: an assessment study from classical to modern text representation models [59.107260266206445]
  Short texts published on Twitter have earned significant attention as a rich source of information. Their inherent characteristics, such as the informal, and noisy linguistic style, remain challenging to many natural language processing (NLP) tasks. This study fulfils an assessment of existing language models in distinguishing the sentiment expressed in tweets by using a rich collection of 22 datasets.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-05-29T21:05:28Z)
• Unsupervised Domain Adaptation of a Pretrained Cross-Lingual Language Model [58.27176041092891]
  Recent research indicates that pretraining cross-lingual language models on large-scale unlabeled texts yields significant performance improvements. We propose a novel unsupervised feature decomposition method that can automatically extract domain-specific features from the entangled pretrained cross-lingual representations. Our proposed model leverages mutual information estimation to decompose the representations computed by a cross-lingual model into domain-invariant and domain-specific parts.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-11-23T16:00:42Z)
• Curious Case of Language Generation Evaluation Metrics: A Cautionary Tale [52.663117551150954]
  A few popular metrics remain as the de facto metrics to evaluate tasks such as image captioning and machine translation. This is partly due to ease of use, and partly because researchers expect to see them and know how to interpret them. In this paper, we urge the community for more careful consideration of how they automatically evaluate their models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-10-26T13:57:20Z)
• Limits of Detecting Text Generated by Large-Scale Language Models [65.46403462928319]
  Some consider large-scale language models that can generate long and coherent pieces of text as dangerous, since they may be used in misinformation campaigns. Here we formulate large-scale language model output detection as a hypothesis testing problem to classify text as genuine or generated.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-02-09T19:53:23Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.