The Sweet Danger of Sugar: Debunking Representation Learning for Encrypted Traffic Classification
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2507.16438v1
- Date: Tue, 22 Jul 2025 10:32:50 GMT
- Title: The Sweet Danger of Sugar: Debunking Representation Learning for Encrypted Traffic Classification
- Authors: Yuqi Zhao, Giovanni Dettori, Matteo Boffa, Luca Vassio, Marco Mellia,
- Abstract summary: This paper critically reassesses proposals that exploit Representation Learning models to create traffic representations.<n>We introduce Pcap-Encoder, an LM-based representation learning model that we specifically design to extract features from protocol headers.<n>Our findings reveal flaws in dataset preparation and model training, calling for a better and more conscious test design.
- Score: 3.064166155269814
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
- Abstract: Recently we have witnessed the explosion of proposals that, inspired by Language Models like BERT, exploit Representation Learning models to create traffic representations. All of them promise astonishing performance in encrypted traffic classification (up to 98% accuracy). In this paper, with a networking expert mindset, we critically reassess their performance. Through extensive analysis, we demonstrate that the reported successes are heavily influenced by data preparation problems, which allow these models to find easy shortcuts - spurious correlation between features and labels - during fine-tuning that unrealistically boost their performance. When such shortcuts are not present - as in real scenarios - these models perform poorly. We also introduce Pcap-Encoder, an LM-based representation learning model that we specifically design to extract features from protocol headers. Pcap-Encoder appears to be the only model that provides an instrumental representation for traffic classification. Yet, its complexity questions its applicability in practical settings. Our findings reveal flaws in dataset preparation and model training, calling for a better and more conscious test design. We propose a correct evaluation methodology and stress the need for rigorous benchmarking.
Related papers
- Interpretable Anomaly Detection in Encrypted Traffic Using SHAP with Machine Learning Models [0.0]
This study aims to develop an interpretable machine learning-based framework for anomaly detection in encrypted network traffic.<n>Models are trained and evaluated on three benchmark encrypted traffic datasets.<n> SHAP visualizations successfully revealed the most influential traffic features contributing to anomaly predictions.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-05-22T05:50:39Z) - Shortcut Learning Susceptibility in Vision Classifiers [3.004632712148892]
Shortcut learning is where machine learning models exploit spurious correlations in data instead of capturing meaningful features.<n>This phenomenon is prevalent across various machine learning applications, including vision, natural language processing, and speech recognition.<n>We systematically evaluate these architectures by introducing deliberate shortcuts into the dataset that are positionally correlated with class labels.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-02-13T10:25:52Z) - Zero-shot Retrieval: Augmenting Pre-trained Models with Search Engines [83.65380507372483]
Large pre-trained models can dramatically reduce the amount of task-specific data required to solve a problem, but they often fail to capture domain-specific nuances out of the box.
This paper shows how to leverage recent advances in NLP and multi-modal learning to augment a pre-trained model with search engine retrieval.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-11-29T05:33:28Z) - Improving Input-label Mapping with Demonstration Replay for In-context
Learning [67.57288926736923]
In-context learning (ICL) is an emerging capability of large autoregressive language models.
We propose a novel ICL method called Sliding Causal Attention (RdSca)
We show that our method significantly improves the input-label mapping in ICL demonstrations.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-10-30T14:29:41Z) - Uncovering the Hidden Cost of Model Compression [43.62624133952414]
Visual Prompting has emerged as a pivotal method for transfer learning in computer vision.
Model compression detrimentally impacts the performance of visual prompting-based transfer.
However, negative effects on calibration are not present when models are compressed via quantization.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-08-29T01:47:49Z) - Enhancing Multiple Reliability Measures via Nuisance-extended
Information Bottleneck [77.37409441129995]
In practical scenarios where training data is limited, many predictive signals in the data can be rather from some biases in data acquisition.
We consider an adversarial threat model under a mutual information constraint to cover a wider class of perturbations in training.
We propose an autoencoder-based training to implement the objective, as well as practical encoder designs to facilitate the proposed hybrid discriminative-generative training.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-03-24T16:03:21Z) - Studying How to Efficiently and Effectively Guide Models with Explanations [52.498055901649025]
'Model guidance' is the idea of regularizing the models' explanations to ensure that they are "right for the right reasons"
We conduct an in-depth evaluation across various loss functions, attribution methods, models, and 'guidance depths' on the PASCAL VOC 2007 and MS COCO 2014 datasets.
Specifically, we guide the models via bounding box annotations, which are much cheaper to obtain than the commonly used segmentation masks.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-03-21T15:34:50Z) - Localized Shortcut Removal [4.511561231517167]
High performance on held-out test data does not necessarily indicate that a model generalizes or learns anything meaningful.
This is often due to the existence of machine learning shortcuts - features in the data that are predictive but unrelated to the problem at hand.
We use an adversarially trained lens to detect and eliminate highly predictive but semantically unconnected clues in images.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-11-24T13:05:33Z) - LegoNet: A Fast and Exact Unlearning Architecture [59.49058450583149]
Machine unlearning aims to erase the impact of specific training samples upon deleted requests from a trained model.
We present a novel network, namely textitLegoNet, which adopts the framework of fixed encoder + multiple adapters''
We show that LegoNet accomplishes fast and exact unlearning while maintaining acceptable performance, synthetically outperforming unlearning baselines.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-10-28T09:53:05Z) - Explain, Edit, and Understand: Rethinking User Study Design for
Evaluating Model Explanations [97.91630330328815]
We conduct a crowdsourcing study, where participants interact with deception detection models that have been trained to distinguish between genuine and fake hotel reviews.
We observe that for a linear bag-of-words model, participants with access to the feature coefficients during training are able to cause a larger reduction in model confidence in the testing phase when compared to the no-explanation control.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-12-17T18:29:56Z) - Label-Descriptive Patterns and their Application to Characterizing
Classification Errors [31.272875287136426]
State-of-the-art deep learning methods achieve human-like performance on many tasks, but make errors nevertheless.
Characterizing these errors in easily interpretable terms gives insight into whether a model is prone to making systematic errors, but also gives a way to act and improve the model.
In this paper we propose a method that allows us to do so for arbitrary classifiers by mining a small set of patterns that together succinctly describe the input data that is partitioned according to correctness of prediction.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-10-18T19:42:21Z) - Layer-wise Analysis of a Self-supervised Speech Representation Model [26.727775920272205]
Self-supervised learning approaches have been successful for pre-training speech representation models.
Not much has been studied about the type or extent of information encoded in the pre-trained representations themselves.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-07-10T02:13:25Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.