Defining ethically sourced code generation

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2507.19743v1
• Date: Sat, 26 Jul 2025 02:27:06 GMT
• Title: Defining ethically sourced code generation
• Abstract summary: We introduce the novel notion of Ethically Sourced Code Generation (ES-CodeGen) to refer to managing all processes involved in code generation model development.<n>To build a taxonomy of ES-CodeGen, we read 803 papers across various domains and specific to AI-based code generation.<n>We surveyed 32 practitioners, which include six developers who submitted GitHub issues to opt-out from the Stack dataset.
• Score: 16.525245724122268
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Several code generation models have been proposed to help reduce time and effort in solving software-related tasks. To ensure responsible AI, there are growing interests over various ethical issues (e.g., unclear licensing, privacy, fairness, and environment impact). These studies have the overarching goal of ensuring ethically sourced generation, which has gained growing attentions in speech synthesis and image generation. In this paper, we introduce the novel notion of Ethically Sourced Code Generation (ES-CodeGen) to refer to managing all processes involved in code generation model development from data collection to post-deployment via ethical and sustainable practices. To build a taxonomy of ES-CodeGen, we perform a two-phase literature review where we read 803 papers across various domains and specific to AI-based code generation. We identified 71 relevant papers with 10 initial dimensions of ES-CodeGen. To refine our dimensions and gain insights on consequences of ES-CodeGen, we surveyed 32 practitioners, which include six developers who submitted GitHub issues to opt-out from the Stack dataset (these impacted users have real-world experience of ethically sourcing issues in code generation models). The results lead to 11 dimensions of ES-CodeGen with a new dimension on code quality as practitioners have noted its importance. We also identified consequences, artifacts, and stages relevant to ES-CodeGen. Our post-survey reflection showed that most practitioners tend to ignore social-related dimensions despite their importance. Most practitioners either agreed or strongly agreed that our survey help improve their understanding of ES-CodeGen. Our study calls for attentions of various ethical issues towards ES-CodeGen.

Related papers

• How Developers Discuss Generative AI: A Longitudinal Study of the Visual Studio Code Community [0.0]
  Generative AI tools such as GitHub Copilot, ChatGPT, and coding agents have rapidly become part of everyday software development.<n>This paper presents a longitudinal analysis of generative-AI-related discussions in the Visual Studio Code (VS Code) GitHub repository.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-09-04T03:16:08Z)
• On Automated and Explainable Provenance of AI-Generated Code [56.818202904805446]
  We argue that the next generation of CodeGenAI tools must be built on a foundation of explainable provenance.<n>We describe a research program combining large-scale empirical studies with post-hoc causal and interpretability techniques.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-08-03T14:50:31Z)
• Empirical Study on the Characteristics and Evolution of AI-usage in GitHub Repositories: Evidence from Code Comments [7.213400161126317]
  We analyze 35,361 GitHub code comments that explicitly reference AI use and their associated code blocks.<n>We first open-code 500 unique comments and code blocks to derive a taxonomy of AI-assisted development activities.<n>We then annotate the full dataset using two LLM-based classifiers and aggregate predictions with Dawid-Skene expectation-maximization.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-06-05T02:37:44Z)
• Building Software by Rolling the Dice: A Qualitative Study of Vibe Coding [15.145249560710377]
  "vibe coders" build software primarily through prompts rather than writing code.<n>We conducted a theory study of 20 vibe-coding videos, including 7 live-streamed coding sessions and 13 opinion videos.<n>Our findings reveal a spectrum of behaviors: some vibe coders rely almost entirely on AI, while others examine and adapt generated outputs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-12-27T00:38:37Z)
• AI Code in the Wild: Measuring Security Risks and Ecosystem Shifts of AI-Generated Code in Modern Software [12.708926174194199]
  We present the first large-scale empirical study of AI-generated code (AIGCode) in the wild.<n>We build a high-precision detection pipeline and a benchmark to distinguish AIGCode from human-written code.<n>This lets us label commits, files, and functions along a human/AI axis and trace how AIGCode moves through projects and vulnerability life cycles.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-12-21T02:26:29Z)
• From Code Foundation Models to Agents and Applications: A Practical Guide to Code Intelligence [150.3696990310269]
  Large language models (LLMs) have transformed automated software development by enabling direct translation of natural language descriptions into functional code.<n>We provide a comprehensive synthesis and practical guide (a series of analytic and probing experiments) about code LLMs.<n>We analyze the code capability of the general LLMs (GPT-4, Claude, LLaMA) and code-specialized LLMs (StarCoder, Code LLaMA, DeepSeek-Coder, and QwenCoder)
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-11-23T17:09:34Z)
• A Survey of Vibe Coding with Large Language Models [93.88284590533242]
  "Vibe Coding" is a development methodology where developers validate AI-generated implementations through outcome observation.<n>Despite its transformative potential, the effectiveness of this emergent paradigm remains under-explored.<n>This survey provides the first comprehensive and systematic review of Vibe Coding with large language models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-14T11:26:56Z)
• The Impact of Generative AI on Code Expertise Models: An Exploratory Study [0.0]
  We present an exploratory analysis of how a knowledge model and a Truck Factor algorithm can be affected by GenAI usage.<n>Our findings suggest that as GenAI becomes more integrated into development, the reliability of such metrics may decrease.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-07-10T20:43:08Z)
• Bridging LLM-Generated Code and Requirements: Reverse Generation technique and SBC Metric for Developer Insights [0.0]
  This paper introduces a novel scoring mechanism called the SBC score.<n>It is based on a reverse generation technique that leverages the natural language generation capabilities of Large Language Models.<n>Unlike direct code analysis, our approach reconstructs system requirements from AI-generated code and compares them with the original specifications.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-11T01:12:11Z)
• Dear Diary: A randomized controlled trial of Generative AI coding tools in the workplace [2.5280615594444567]
  Generative AI coding tools are relatively new, and their impact on developers extends beyond traditional coding metrics. This study aims to illuminate developers' preexisting beliefs about generative AI tools, their self perceptions, and how regular use of these tools may alter these beliefs. Our findings reveal that the introduction and sustained use of generative AI coding tools significantly increases developers' perceptions of these tools as both useful and enjoyable.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-24T00:07:27Z)
• Codev-Bench: How Do LLMs Understand Developer-Centric Code Completion? [60.84912551069379]
  We present the Code-Development Benchmark (Codev-Bench), a fine-grained, real-world, repository-level, and developer-centric evaluation framework. Codev-Agent is an agent-based system that automates repository crawling, constructs execution environments, extracts dynamic calling chains from existing unit tests, and generates new test samples to avoid data leakage.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-02T09:11:10Z)
• CodeRAG-Bench: Can Retrieval Augment Code Generation? [78.37076502395699]
  We conduct a systematic, large-scale analysis of code generation using retrieval-augmented generation.<n>We first curate a comprehensive evaluation benchmark, CodeRAG-Bench, encompassing three categories of code generation tasks.<n>We examine top-performing models on CodeRAG-Bench by providing contexts retrieved from one or multiple sources.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-20T16:59:52Z)
• VersiCode: Towards Version-controllable Code Generation [58.82709231906735]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) have made tremendous strides in code generation, but existing research fails to account for the dynamic nature of software development. We propose two novel tasks aimed at bridging this gap: version-specific code completion (VSCC) and version-aware code migration (VACM) We conduct an extensive evaluation on VersiCode, which reveals that version-controllable code generation is indeed a significant challenge.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-11T16:15:06Z)
• A Survey on Large Language Models for Code Generation [9.555952109820392]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) have garnered remarkable advancements across diverse code-related tasks. This survey aims to bridge the gap between academia and practical development by providing a comprehensive and up-to-date literature review.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-01T17:48:15Z)
• A Survey of Neural Code Intelligence: Paradigms, Advances and Beyond [84.95530356322621]
  This survey presents a systematic review of the advancements in code intelligence.<n>It covers over 50 representative models and their variants, more than 20 categories of tasks, and an extensive coverage of over 680 related works.<n>Building on our examination of the developmental trajectories, we further investigate the emerging synergies between code intelligence and broader machine intelligence.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-21T08:54:56Z)
• Uncovering and Quantifying Social Biases in Code Generation [71.96047133403688]
  We propose a new paradigm to construct code prompts and successfully uncover social biases in code generation models. We develop a dataset along with three metrics to evaluate the overall social bias and fine-grained unfairness across different demographics. We conduct analysis to provide useful insights for further choice of code generation models with low social bias.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-24T17:37:33Z)
• A Comprehensive Survey of AI-Generated Content (AIGC): A History of Generative AI from GAN to ChatGPT [63.58711128819828]
  ChatGPT and other Generative AI (GAI) techniques belong to the category of Artificial Intelligence Generated Content (AIGC) The goal of AIGC is to make the content creation process more efficient and accessible, allowing for the production of high-quality content at a faster pace.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-03-07T20:36:13Z)
• Chatbots As Fluent Polyglots: Revisiting Breakthrough Code Snippets [0.0]
  The research applies AI-driven code assistants to analyze a selection of influential computer code that has shaped modern technology. The original contribution of this study was to examine half of the most significant code advances in the last 50 years.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-01-05T23:17:17Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.