Dialogues of Dissent: Thematic and Rhetorical Dimensions of Hate and Counter-Hate Speech in Social Media Conversations

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2507.20528v1
• Date: Mon, 28 Jul 2025 05:22:45 GMT
• Title: Dialogues of Dissent: Thematic and Rhetorical Dimensions of Hate and Counter-Hate Speech in Social Media Conversations
• Authors: Effi Levi, Gal Ron, Odelia Oshri, Shaul R. Shenhav,
• Abstract summary: We introduce a novel scheme for joint annotation of hate and counter-hate speech in social media conversations.<n>The thematic categories outline different aspects of each type of speech, while the rhetorical dimension captures how hate and counter messages are communicated.
• Score: 1.4999444543328293
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: We introduce a novel multi-labeled scheme for joint annotation of hate and counter-hate speech in social media conversations, categorizing hate and counter-hate messages into thematic and rhetorical dimensions. The thematic categories outline different discursive aspects of each type of speech, while the rhetorical dimension captures how hate and counter messages are communicated, drawing on Aristotle's Logos, Ethos and Pathos. We annotate a sample of 92 conversations, consisting of 720 tweets, and conduct statistical analyses, incorporating public metrics, to explore patterns of interaction between the thematic and rhetorical dimensions within and between hate and counter-hate speech. Our findings provide insights into the spread of hate messages on social media, the strategies used to counter them, and their potential impact on online behavior.

Related papers

• WavChat: A Survey of Spoken Dialogue Models [66.82775211793547]
  Recent advancements in spoken dialogue models, exemplified by systems like GPT-4o, have captured significant attention in the speech domain. These advanced spoken dialogue models not only comprehend audio, music, and other speech-related features, but also capture stylistic and timbral characteristics in speech. Despite the progress in spoken dialogue systems, there is a lack of comprehensive surveys that systematically organize and analyze these systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-15T04:16:45Z)
• Lexical Squad@Multimodal Hate Speech Event Detection 2023: Multimodal Hate Speech Detection using Fused Ensemble Approach [0.23020018305241333]
  We present our novel ensemble learning approach for detecting hate speech, by classifying text-embedded images into two labels, namely "Hate Speech" and "No Hate Speech" Our proposed ensemble model yielded promising results with 75.21 and 74.96 as accuracy and F-1 score (respectively)
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-09-23T12:06:05Z)
• Multi-turn Dialogue Comprehension from a Topic-aware Perspective [70.37126956655985]
  This paper proposes to model multi-turn dialogues from a topic-aware perspective. We use a dialogue segmentation algorithm to split a dialogue passage into topic-concentrated fragments in an unsupervised way. We also present a novel model, Topic-Aware Dual-Attention Matching (TADAM) Network, which takes topic segments as processing elements.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-09-18T11:03:55Z)
• CoSyn: Detecting Implicit Hate Speech in Online Conversations Using a Context Synergized Hyperbolic Network [52.85130555886915]
  CoSyn is a context-synergized neural network that explicitly incorporates user- and conversational context for detecting implicit hate speech in online conversations. We show that CoSyn outperforms all our baselines in detecting implicit hate speech with absolute improvements in the range of 1.24% - 57.8%.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-03-02T17:30:43Z)
• Collective moderation of hate, toxicity, and extremity in online discussions [1.114199733551736]
  We analyze a large corpus of more than 130,000 discussions on Twitter over four years. We identify different dimensions of discourse that might be related to the probability of hate speech in subsequent tweets. We find that expressing simple opinions, not necessarily supported by facts, relates to the least hate in subsequent discussions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-03-01T09:35:26Z)
• Addressing the Challenges of Cross-Lingual Hate Speech Detection [115.1352779982269]
  In this paper we focus on cross-lingual transfer learning to support hate speech detection in low-resource languages. We leverage cross-lingual word embeddings to train our neural network systems on the source language and apply it to the target language. We investigate the issue of label imbalance of hate speech datasets, since the high ratio of non-hate examples compared to hate examples often leads to low model performance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-01-15T20:48:14Z)
• Who Responded to Whom: The Joint Effects of Latent Topics and Discourse in Conversation Structure [53.77234444565652]
  We identify the responding relations in the conversation discourse, which link response utterances to their initiations. We propose a model to learn latent topics and discourse in word distributions, and predict pairwise initiation-response links. Experimental results on both English and Chinese conversations show that our model significantly outperforms the previous state of the arts.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-04-17T17:46:00Z)
• Interpretable Multi-Modal Hate Speech Detection [32.36781061930129]
  We propose a deep neural multi-modal model that can effectively capture the semantics of the text along with socio-cultural context in which a particular hate expression is made. Our model is able to outperform the existing state-of-the-art hate speech classification approaches.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-03-02T10:12:26Z)
• Impact and dynamics of hate and counter speech online [0.0]
  Citizen-generated counter speech is a promising way to fight hate speech and promote peaceful, non-polarized discourse. We analyze 180,000 political conversations that took place on German Twitter over four years.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-09-16T01:43:28Z)
• Is this Dialogue Coherent? Learning from Dialogue Acts and Entities [82.44143808977209]
  We create the Switchboard Coherence (SWBD-Coh) corpus, a dataset of human-human spoken dialogues annotated with turn coherence ratings. Our statistical analysis of the corpus indicates how turn coherence perception is affected by patterns of distribution of entities. We find that models combining both DA and entity information yield the best performances both for response selection and turn coherence rating.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-06-17T21:02:40Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.