Analyzing and Evaluating the Behavior of Git Diff and Merge

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2507.22071v1
• Date: Wed, 16 Jul 2025 13:01:03 GMT
• Title: Analyzing and Evaluating the Behavior of Git Diff and Merge
• Authors: Niels Glodny,
• Abstract summary: I document the main functionalities of Git: how diffs are computed, how they are used to run merges, and how merges enable more complex operations.<n>The default merge strategy (ort) can result in merges requiring exponential time in the number of commits in the history.<n>Sometimes when two sides of a merge add different lines at the same position, the result is not a conflict, but a merge containing both changes after each other, in arbitrary order.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Despite being widely used, the algorithms that enable collaboration with Git are not well understood. The diff and merge algorithms are particularly interesting, as they could be applied in other contexts. In this thesis, I document the main functionalities of Git: how diffs are computed, how they are used to run merges, and how merges enable more complex operations. In the process, I show multiple unexpected behaviors in Git, including the following: The histogram diff algorithm has pathological cases where a single-line change can cause the entire rest of the file to be marked as changed. The default merge strategy (ort) can result in merges requiring exponential time in the number of commits in the history. Merges and rebases are not commutative, and even when merges do not result in a conflict, the result is not specified but depends on the diff algorithm used. And finally, sometimes when two sides of a merge add different lines at the same position, the result is not a conflict, but a merge containing both changes after each other, in arbitrary order.

Related papers

• LastMerge: A language-agnostic structured tool for code integration [1.201626478128059]
  We propose LastMerge, a generic structured merge tool that can be configured through a thin interface.<n>We run an experiment with four structured merge tools: two Java specific tools, jDime and Spork, and their generic counterparts, respectively LastMerge and Mergiraf.<n>Our results show no evidence that generic structured merge significantly impacts merge accuracy.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-07-25T21:46:10Z)
• Don't Get Lost in the Trees: Streamlining LLM Reasoning by Overcoming Tree Search Exploration Pitfalls [83.89771461061903]
  Recent advancements in tree search algorithms guided by verifiers have significantly enhanced the reasoning capabilities of large language models (LLMs)<n>Recent advancements in tree search algorithms guided by verifiers have significantly enhanced the reasoning capabilities of large language models (LLMs)<n>We identify two key challenges contributing to this inefficiency: $textitover-exploration$ due to redundant states with semantically equivalent content, and $textitunder-exploration$ caused by high variance in verifier scoring.<n>We propose FETCH, a flexible, plug-and-play system compatible with various tree search algorithms.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-16T16:12:01Z)
• A Greedy Strategy for Graph Cut [95.2841574410968]
  We propose a greedy strategy to solve the problem of Graph Cut, called GGC.<n>It starts from the state where each data sample is regarded as a cluster and dynamically merges the two clusters.<n>GGC has a nearly linear computational complexity with respect to the number of samples.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-12-28T05:49:42Z)
• SiReRAG: Indexing Similar and Related Information for Multihop Reasoning [96.60045548116584]
  SiReRAG is a novel RAG indexing approach that explicitly considers both similar and related information.<n>SiReRAG consistently outperforms state-of-the-art indexing methods on three multihop datasets.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-12-09T04:56:43Z)
• If You Can't Use Them, Recycle Them: Optimizing Merging at Scale Mitigates Performance Tradeoffs [48.95875673503714]
  We study merging "generalist" models trained on many tasks.<n>Our algorithm tunes the weight of each checkpoint in a linear combination, resulting in an optimal model.<n>Good merges tend to include almost all checkpoints with non-zero weights, indicating that even seemingly bad initial checkpoints can contribute to good final merges.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-12-05T13:12:51Z)
• Evaluation of Version Control Merge Tools [3.1969855247377836]
  A version control system, such as Git, requires a way to integrate changes from different developers or branches. A merge tool either outputs a clean integration of the changes, or it outputs a conflict for manual resolution. New merge tools have been proposed, but they have not yet been evaluated against one another.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-13T17:35:14Z)
• WizardMerge -- Save Us From Merging Without Any Clues [8.21089093466603]
  We present WizardMerge, an auxiliary tool that leverages merging results from Git to retrieve code block dependency on text and LLVM-IR level. The outcomes demonstrate that WizardMerge diminishes conflict merging time costs, achieving a 23.85% reduction.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-03T05:40:29Z)
• Combining Global and Local Merges in Logic-based Entity Resolution [11.189054189860158]
  Lace is a framework for collective entity resolution. logical rules and constraints are used to identify pairs of entity references that denote the same entity. All occurrences of those entity references are deemed equal and can be merged. This motivates us to extend Lace with local merges of values and explore the computational properties of the resulting formalism.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-26T13:38:36Z)
• Do code refactorings influence the merge effort? [80.1936417993664]
  Multiple contributors frequently change the source code in parallel to implement new features, fix bugs, existing code, and make other changes. These simultaneous changes need to be merged into the same version of the source code. Studies show that 10 to 20 percent of all merge attempts result in conflicts, which require the manual developer's intervention to complete the process.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-10T13:24:59Z)
• Unsupervised Hashing with Similarity Distribution Calibration [127.34239817201549]
  Unsupervised hashing methods aim to preserve the similarity between data points in a feature space by mapping them to binary hash codes. These methods often overlook the fact that the similarity between data points in the continuous feature space may not be preserved in the discrete hash code space. The similarity range is bounded by the code length and can lead to a problem known as similarity collapse. This paper introduces a novel Similarity Distribution (SDC) method to alleviate this problem.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-02-15T14:06:39Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.