Secure coding for web applications: Frameworks, challenges, and the role of LLMs

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2507.22223v2
• Date: Sun, 03 Aug 2025 16:54:37 GMT
• Title: Secure coding for web applications: Frameworks, challenges, and the role of LLMs
• Authors: Kiana Kiashemshaki, Mohammad Jalili Torkamani, Negin Mahmoudi,
• Abstract summary: Secure coding is a critical yet often overlooked practice in software development.<n>Despite extensive awareness efforts, real-world adoption remains inconsistent due to organizational, educational, and technical barriers.<n>This paper offers practical insights for researchers, developers, and educators on integrating secure coding into real-world development processes.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Secure coding is a critical yet often overlooked practice in software development. Despite extensive awareness efforts, real-world adoption remains inconsistent due to organizational, educational, and technical barriers. This paper provides a comprehensive review of secure coding practices across major frameworks and domains, including web development, DevSecOps, and cloud security. It introduces a structured framework comparison and categorizes threats aligned with the OWASP Top 10. Additionally, we explore the rising role of Large Language Models (LLMs) in evaluating and recommending secure code, presenting a reproducible case study across four major vulnerability types. This paper offers practical insights for researchers, developers, and educators on integrating secure coding into real-world development processes.

Related papers

• ROSE: Toward Reality-Oriented Safety Evaluation of Large Language Models [60.28667314609623]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) are increasingly deployed as black-box components in real-world applications.<n>We propose Reality-Oriented Safety Evaluation (ROSE), a novel framework that uses multi-objective reinforcement learning to fine-tune an adversarial LLM.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-17T10:55:17Z)
• Software Security Mapping Framework: Operationalization of Security Requirements [12.04694982718246]
  The Software Security Mapping Framework is a structured solution designed to operationalize security requirements across hierarchical levels.<n>The framework systematically maps 131 refined security requirements to over 400 actionable operational steps spanning the software development lifecycle.<n>It is grounded in four core security goals: Secure Software Environment, Secure Software Development, Software Traceability, and Vulnerability Management.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-22T06:34:48Z)
• The Hidden Risks of LLM-Generated Web Application Code: A Security-Centric Evaluation of Code Generation Capabilities in Large Language Models [0.769672852567215]
  This paper uses predefined security parameters to evaluate the security compliance of LLM-generated code across multiple models.<n>The analysis reveals critical vulnerabilities in authentication mechanisms, session management, input validation and HTTP security headers.<n>Our findings underscore that human expertise is crucial to ensure secure software deployment or review of LLM-generated code.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-29T10:23:11Z)
• Towards Trustworthy GUI Agents: A Survey [64.6445117343499]
  This survey examines the trustworthiness of GUI agents in five critical dimensions.<n>We identify major challenges such as vulnerability to adversarial attacks, cascading failure modes in sequential decision-making.<n>As GUI agents become more widespread, establishing robust safety standards and responsible development practices is essential.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-30T13:26:00Z)
• Integrating DAST in Kanban and CI/CD: A Real World Security Case Study [2.3480418671346164]
  Web application attacks and exploited vulnerabilities are rising.<n>It is increasingly crucial to integrate security into modern development practices.<n>It is challenging to adopt security practices and activities in modern development practices.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-27T19:46:05Z)
• AISafetyLab: A Comprehensive Framework for AI Safety Evaluation and Improvement [73.0700818105842]
  We introduce AISafetyLab, a unified framework and toolkit that integrates representative attack, defense, and evaluation methodologies for AI safety.<n> AISafetyLab features an intuitive interface that enables developers to seamlessly apply various techniques.<n>We conduct empirical studies on Vicuna, analyzing different attack and defense strategies to provide valuable insights into their comparative effectiveness.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-24T02:11:52Z)
• Is Your AI-Generated Code Really Safe? Evaluating Large Language Models on Secure Code Generation with CodeSecEval [20.959848710829878]
  Large language models (LLMs) have brought significant advancements to code generation and code repair. However, their training using unsanitized data from open-source repositories, like GitHub, raises the risk of inadvertently propagating security vulnerabilities. We aim to present a comprehensive study aimed at precisely evaluating and enhancing the security aspects of code LLMs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-02T16:13:21Z)
• INDICT: Code Generation with Internal Dialogues of Critiques for Both Security and Helpfulness [110.6921470281479]
  We introduce INDICT: a new framework that empowers large language models with Internal Dialogues of Critiques for both safety and helpfulness guidance. The internal dialogue is a dual cooperative system between a safety-driven critic and a helpfulness-driven critic. We observed that our approach can provide an advanced level of critiques of both safety and helpfulness analysis, significantly improving the quality of output codes.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-23T15:55:07Z)
• Prompting Large Language Models to Tackle the Full Software Development Lifecycle: A Case Study [72.24266814625685]
  We explore the performance of large language models (LLMs) across the entire software development lifecycle with DevEval.<n>DevEval features four programming languages, multiple domains, high-quality data collection, and carefully designed and verified metrics for each task.<n> Empirical studies show that current LLMs, including GPT-4, fail to solve the challenges presented within DevEval.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-13T15:13:44Z)
• Enhancing Large Language Models for Secure Code Generation: A Dataset-driven Study on Vulnerability Mitigation [24.668682498171776]
  Large language models (LLMs) have brought significant advancements to code generation, benefiting both novice and experienced developers. However, their training using unsanitized data from open-source repositories, like GitHub, introduces the risk of inadvertently propagating security vulnerabilities. This paper presents a comprehensive study focused on evaluating and enhancing code LLMs from a software security perspective.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-25T00:32:56Z)
• CodeLMSec Benchmark: Systematically Evaluating and Finding Security Vulnerabilities in Black-Box Code Language Models [58.27254444280376]
  Large language models (LLMs) for automatic code generation have achieved breakthroughs in several programming tasks. Training data for these models is usually collected from the Internet (e.g., from open-source repositories) and is likely to contain faults and security vulnerabilities. This unsanitized training data can cause the language models to learn these vulnerabilities and propagate them during the code generation procedure.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-02-08T11:54:07Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.