Tracking research software outputs in the UK

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2507.22871v1
• Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2025 17:46:47 GMT
• Title: Tracking research software outputs in the UK
• Authors: Domhnall Carlin, Austen Rainer,
• Abstract summary: This study examines where UK academic institutions store and register software as a unique research output.<n>The quantity of software reported as research outcomes remains low in proportion to other categories.<n>Artifact sharing appears low, with one-quarter of the reported software having no links and 45% having either a missing or erroneous URL.
• Score: 1.1970409518725493
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Research software is crucial in the research process and the growth of Open Science underscores the importance of accessing research artifacts, like data and code, raising traceability challenges among outputs. While it is a clear principle that research code, along with other essential outputs, should be recognised as artifacts of the research process, the how of this principle remains variable. This study examines where UK academic institutions store and register software as a unique research output, searching the UKRI's Gateway to Research (GtR) metadata for publicly funded research software in the UK. The quantity of software reported as research outcomes remains low in proportion to other categories. Artifact sharing appears low, with one-quarter of the reported software having no links and 45% having either a missing or erroneous URL. Of the valid URLs, we find the single largest category is Public Commercial Code Repository, with GitHub being the host of 18% of all publicly funded research software listed. These observations are contrasted with past findings from 2023 and finally, we discuss the lack of artifact sharing in UK research, with resulting implications for the maintenance and evolution of research software. Without dissemination, research software risks demotion to a transient artifact, useful only to meet short term research demands but ultimately lost to the broader enterprise of science.

Related papers

• AI4Research: A Survey of Artificial Intelligence for Scientific Research [55.5452803680643]
  We present a comprehensive survey on AI for Research (AI4Research)<n>We first introduce a systematic taxonomy to classify five mainstream tasks in AI4Research.<n>We identify key research gaps and highlight promising future directions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-07-02T17:19:20Z)
• Research Artifacts in Secondary Studies: A Systematic Mapping in Software Engineering [0.9421843976231371]
  Systematic reviews (SRs) summarize state-of-the-art evidence in science, including software engineering (SE)<n>We examined 537 secondary studies published between 2013 and 2023 to analyze the availability and reporting of research artifacts.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-17T05:11:39Z)
• Transforming Science with Large Language Models: A Survey on AI-assisted Scientific Discovery, Experimentation, Content Generation, and Evaluation [58.064940977804596]
  A plethora of new AI models and tools has been proposed, promising to empower researchers and academics worldwide to conduct their research more effectively and efficiently.<n>Ethical concerns regarding shortcomings of these tools and potential for misuse take a particularly prominent place in our discussion.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-07T18:26:45Z)
• No Free Lunch: Research Software Testing in Teaching [1.4396109429521227]
  This research explores the effects of research software testing integrated into teaching on research software.<n>In an in-vivo experiment, we integrated the engineering of a test suite for a large-scale network simulation as group projects into a course on software testing at the Blekinge Institute of Technology, Sweden.<n>We found that the research software benefited from the integration through substantially improved documentation and fewer hardware and software dependencies.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-20T11:40:01Z)
• A pragmatic workflow for research software engineering in computational science [0.0]
  University research groups in Computational Science and Engineering (CSE) generally lack dedicated funding and personnel for Research Software Engineering (RSE) RSE shifts the focus away from sustainable research software development and reproducible results. We propose a RSE workflow for CSE that addresses these challenges, that improves the quality of research output in CSE.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-02T08:04:12Z)
• A Metadata-Based Ecosystem to Improve the FAIRness of Research Software [0.3185506103768896]
  The reuse of research software is central to research efficiency and academic exchange. The DataDesc ecosystem is presented, an approach to describing data models of software interfaces with detailed and machine-actionable metadata.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-18T19:01:08Z)
• Assessing Scientific Contributions in Data Sharing Spaces [64.16762375635842]
  This paper introduces the SCIENCE-index, a blockchain-based metric measuring a researcher's scientific contributions. To incentivize researchers to share their data, the SCIENCE-index is augmented to include a data-sharing parameter. Our model is evaluated by comparing the distribution of its output for geographically diverse researchers to that of the h-index.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-03-18T19:17:47Z)
• Research Trends and Applications of Data Augmentation Algorithms [77.34726150561087]
  We identify the main areas of application of data augmentation algorithms, the types of algorithms used, significant research trends, their progression over time and research gaps in data augmentation literature. We expect readers to understand the potential of data augmentation, as well as identify future research directions and open questions within data augmentation research.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-07-18T11:38:32Z)
• Yes-Yes-Yes: Donation-based Peer Reviewing Data Collection for ACL Rolling Review and Beyond [58.71736531356398]
  We present an in-depth discussion of peer reviewing data, outline the ethical and legal desiderata for peer reviewing data collection, and propose the first continuous, donation-based data collection workflow. We report on the ongoing implementation of this workflow at the ACL Rolling Review and deliver the first insights obtained with the newly collected data.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-01-27T11:02:43Z)
• Software must be recognised as an important output of scholarly research [7.776162183510522]
  We argue that as well as being important from a methodological perspective, software should be recognised as an output of research. The article discusses the different roles that software may play in research and highlights the relationship between software and research sustainability.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-11-15T16:34:31Z)
• Learnings from Frontier Development Lab and SpaceML -- AI Accelerators for NASA and ESA [57.06643156253045]
  Research with AI and ML technologies lives in a variety of settings with often asynchronous goals and timelines. We perform a case study of the Frontier Development Lab (FDL), an AI accelerator under a public-private partnership from NASA and ESA. FDL research follows principled practices that are grounded in responsible development, conduct, and dissemination of AI research.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-11-09T21:23:03Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.