Opacity as Authority: Arbitrariness and the Preclusion of Contestation

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2507.22944v1
• Date: Fri, 25 Jul 2025 19:10:35 GMT
• Title: Opacity as Authority: Arbitrariness and the Preclusion of Contestation
• Abstract summary: Article redefines arbitrariness not as a normative flaw or a symptom of domination, but as a functional mechanism structuring human systems and interactions.<n>Building on Ferdinand de Saussure's concept of l'arbitraire du signe, the analysis extends this principle beyond language to demonstrate its cross-domain applicability.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: This article redefines arbitrariness not as a normative flaw or a symptom of domination, but as a foundational functional mechanism structuring human systems and interactions. Diverging from critical traditions that conflate arbitrariness with injustice, it posits arbitrariness as a semiotic trait: a property enabling systems - linguistic, legal, or social - to operate effectively while withholding their internal rationale. Building on Ferdinand de Saussure's concept of l'arbitraire du signe, the analysis extends this principle beyond language to demonstrate its cross-domain applicability, particularly in law and social dynamics. The paper introduces the "Motivation -> Constatability -> Contestability" chain, arguing that motivation functions as a crucial interface rendering an act's logic vulnerable to intersubjective contestation. When this chain is broken through mechanisms like "immotivization" or "Conflict Lateralization" (exemplified by "the blur of the wolf drowned in the fish"), acts produce binding effects without exposing their rationale, thus precluding justiciability. This structural opacity, while appearing illogical, is a deliberate design protecting authority from accountability. Drawing on Shannon's entropy model, the paper formalizes arbitrariness as A = H(L|M) (conditional entropy). It thereby proposes a modern theory of arbitrariness as a neutral operator central to control as well as care, an overlooked dimension of interpersonal relations. While primarily developed through human social systems, this framework also illuminates a new pathway for analyzing explainability in advanced artificial intelligence systems.

Related papers

• Beyond Post-hoc Explanation: Toward Glassbox AI via Probabilistic Mediation [0.7614628596146601]
  We argue that the problem is not the absence of explanation but the absence of structured reasoning in the first place.<n>This paper makes the case for the Glassbox Framework, in which Bayesian networks serve as transparent, ante-hoc mediation layers for generative models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-06-05T10:08:56Z)
• Provably Secure Agent Guardrail [89.79561918065122]
  Existing defense architectures rely on empirical semantic guardrails and probabilistic large model adjudicators.<n>This paper proposes a new security paradigm for agents based on the fundamental limitations of logical reasoning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-05-28T02:12:41Z)
• ReasonOps: A Unified Operational Paradigm for Trustworthy Verified LLM Reasoning [0.324890820102255]
  This paper introduces ReasonOps, a unified operational paradigm for trustworthy verified reasoning systems.<n>The proposed paradigm integrates semantic interpretation, autoformalization, symbolic reasoning, theorem proving, runtime assurance, probabilistic reliability estimation, and adaptive correction into a unified reasoning lifecycle.<n>We argue that ReasonOps may become foundational infrastructure for next-generation trustworthy AI ecosystems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-05-26T13:32:15Z)
• Active Inference: A method for Phenotyping Agency in AI systems? [0.11904398364437437]
  We argue for a minimal notion open to principled inspection given three criteria.<n> posterior beliefs, prior preferences, and the minimization of expected free energy jointly constitute an agentic action chain.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-04-25T12:41:53Z)
• Why Avoid Generative Legal AI Systems? Hallucination, Overreliance, and their Impact on Explainability [0.0]
  This article argues that the deployment of generative AI systems in legal profession requires strong restraint due to the critical risks of hallucination and overreliance.<n>Central to this analysis is the definition of Generative Legal AI (GLAI), an umbrella term for systems specifically adapted for the legal domain.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-03-16T21:40:43Z)
• A Survey of Reasoning in Autonomous Driving Systems: Open Challenges and Emerging Paradigms [49.66022971508878]
  We argue that reasoning should be elevated from a modular component to the system's cognitive core.<n>We derive and systematize seven core reasoning challenges, such as the responsiveness-reasoning trade-off and social-game reasoning.<n>We identify a fundamental and unresolved tension between the high-latency, deliberative nature of LLM-based reasoning and the millisecond-scale, safety-critical demands of vehicle control.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-03-11T07:40:53Z)
• Technosocial risks of ideal emotion recognition technologies: A defense of the (social) value of emotional expressions [51.56484100374058]
  I argue that the appeal of such systems rests on a misunderstanding of the social functions emotional expression.<n>ERTs threaten this expressive space by collapsing epistemic friction, displacing meaning with technology-mediated affective profiles, and narrowing the space for aspirational and role-sensitive expressions.<n>I argue that, although it is intuitive to think that increasing accuracy would legitimise such systems, in the case of ERTs accuracy does not straightforwardly justify their deployment, and may, in some contexts, provide a reason for regulatory restraint.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-09T14:20:42Z)
• Why AI Alignment Failure Is Structural: Learned Human Interaction Structures and AGI as an Endogenous Evolutionary Shock [3.32021037991318]
  Large language models (LLMs) exhibiting behaviors such as deception, threats, or blackmail are often interpreted as evidence of alignment failure or emergent malign agency.<n>We argue that this interpretation rests on a conceptual error.<n>LLMs do not reason morally; they statistically internalize the record of human social interaction.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-13T15:53:26Z)
• Fluid Agency in AI Systems: A Case for Functional Equivalence in Copyright, Patent, and Tort [0.31061678033205636]
  Modern Artificial Intelligence (AI) systems lack human-like consciousness or culpability.<n> Fluid agency generates valuable outputs but collapses attribution.<n>This Article argues that only functional equivalence stabilizes doctrine.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-06T01:06:07Z)
• Interpretation as Linear Transformation: A Cognitive-Geometric Model of Belief and Meaning [0.0]
  I show how belief distortion, motivational drift, counterfactual evaluation, and the limits of mutual understanding arise from purely algebraic constraints.<n>I argue that this cognitive-geometric perspective clarifies the boundaries of influence in both human and artificial systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-12-10T17:13:01Z)
• The Recursive Coherence Principle: A Formal Constraint on Scalable Intelligence, Alignment, and Reasoning Architecture [0.0]
  Coherence is fragile unless a higher-order structure ensures semantic consistency.<n>This paper introduces the Recursive Coherence Principle (RCP)<n>We define the Functional Model of Intelligence (FMI) as the only known operator capable of satisfying the RCP at any scale.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-07-18T09:44:01Z)
• Systemic Constraints of Undecidability [0.0]
  This paper presents a theory of systemic undecidability, reframing incomputability as a structural property of systems.<n>We prove a closure principle: any subsystem that participates functionally in the computation of an undecidable system inherits its undecidability.<n>Our framework disarms oracle mimicry and challenges the view that computational limits can be circumvented through architectural innovation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-21T22:56:26Z)
• Uncertainty, bias and the institution bootstrapping problem [0.0]
  We propose that misperception, specifically, agents' erroneous belief that an institution already exists, could resolve this paradox.<n>We show how these factors collectively mitigate the bootstrapping problem.<n>Our analysis underscores the importance of incorporating human-like cognitive constraints, not just idealized rationality, into models of institutional emergence and resilience.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-30T12:36:06Z)
• Stochastic, Dynamic, Fluid Autonomy in Agentic AI: Implications for Authorship, Inventorship, and Liability [0.2209921757303168]
  Agentic AI systems autonomously pursue goals, adapting strategies through implicit learning.<n>Human and machine contributions become irreducibly entangled in intertwined creative processes.<n>We argue that legal and policy frameworks may need to treat human and machine contributions as functionally equivalent.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-05T04:44:59Z)
• Agency Is Frame-Dependent [94.91580596320331]
  Agency is a system's capacity to steer outcomes toward a goal.<n>We argue that agency is fundamentally frame-dependent.<n>We conclude that any basic science of agency requires frame-dependence.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-06T08:34:57Z)
• A Note on an Inferentialist Approach to Resource Semantics [48.65926948745294]
  'Inferentialism' is the view that meaning is given in terms of inferential behaviour. This paper shows how 'inferentialism' enables a versatile and expressive framework for resource semantics.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-10T14:13:21Z)
• Inferentialist Resource Semantics [48.65926948745294]
  This paper shows how inferentialism enables a versatile and expressive framework for resource semantics.<n>How inferentialism seamlessly incorporates the assertion-based approach of the logic of Bunched Implications.<n>This integration enables reasoning about shared and separated resources in intuitive and familiar ways.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-14T14:54:36Z)
• Logical Neural Networks [51.46602187496816]
  We propose a novel framework seamlessly providing key properties of both neural nets (learning) and symbolic logic (knowledge and reasoning) Every neuron has a meaning as a component of a formula in a weighted real-valued logic, yielding a highly intepretable disentangled representation. Inference is omni rather than focused on predefined target variables, and corresponds to logical reasoning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-06-23T16:55:45Z)
• Machine Common Sense [77.34726150561087]
  Machine common sense remains a broad, potentially unbounded problem in artificial intelligence (AI) This article deals with the aspects of modeling commonsense reasoning focusing on such domain as interpersonal interactions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-06-15T13:59:47Z)
• Aligning Faithful Interpretations with their Social Attribution [58.13152510843004]
  We find that the requirement of model interpretations to be faithful is vague and incomplete. We identify that the problem is a misalignment between the causal chain of decisions (causal attribution) and the attribution of human behavior to the interpretation (social attribution)
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-06-01T16:45:38Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.