Maximize margins for robust splicing detection

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2508.00897v1
• Date: Mon, 28 Jul 2025 08:20:46 GMT
• Title: Maximize margins for robust splicing detection
• Authors: Julien Simon de Kergunic, Rony Abecidan, Patrick Bas, Vincent Itier,
• Abstract summary: We show that the same deep architecture can react very differently to unseen post-processing depending on the learned weights.<n>Our experiments reveal a strong correlation between the distribution of latent margins and a detector's ability to generalize to post-processed images.
• Score: 9.462149599416264
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Despite recent progress in splicing detection, deep learning-based forensic tools remain difficult to deploy in practice due to their high sensitivity to training conditions. Even mild post-processing applied to evaluation images can significantly degrade detector performance, raising concerns about their reliability in operational contexts. In this work, we show that the same deep architecture can react very differently to unseen post-processing depending on the learned weights, despite achieving similar accuracy on in-distribution test data. This variability stems from differences in the latent spaces induced by training, which affect how samples are separated internally. Our experiments reveal a strong correlation between the distribution of latent margins and a detector's ability to generalize to post-processed images. Based on this observation, we propose a practical strategy for building more robust detectors: train several variants of the same model under different conditions, and select the one that maximizes latent margins.

Related papers

• RODEO: Robust Outlier Detection via Exposing Adaptive Out-of-Distribution Samples [4.76428036044684]
  We introduce RODEO, a data-centric approach that generates effective outliers for robust outlier detection.<n>We show that incorporating outlier exposure (OE) and adversarial training can be an effective strategy for this purpose.<n>We demonstrate both quantitatively and qualitatively that our adaptive OE method effectively generates diverse'' and near-distribution'' outliers.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-01-28T14:13:17Z)
• Improving Network Interpretability via Explanation Consistency Evaluation [56.14036428778861]
  We propose a framework that acquires more explainable activation heatmaps and simultaneously increase the model performance. Specifically, our framework introduces a new metric, i.e., explanation consistency, to reweight the training samples adaptively in model learning. Our framework then promotes the model learning by paying closer attention to those training samples with a high difference in explanations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-08T17:20:08Z)
• Enhancing Out-of-Distribution Detection with Multitesting-based Layer-wise Feature Fusion [11.689517005768046]
  Out-of-distribution samples may exhibit shifts in local or global features compared to the training distribution. We propose a novel framework, Multitesting-based Layer-wise Out-of-Distribution (OOD) Detection. Our scheme effectively enhances the performance of out-of-distribution detection when compared to baseline methods.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-16T04:35:04Z)
• Benchmarking common uncertainty estimation methods with histopathological images under domain shift and label noise [62.997667081978825]
  In high-risk environments, deep learning models need to be able to judge their uncertainty and reject inputs when there is a significant chance of misclassification. We conduct a rigorous evaluation of the most commonly used uncertainty and robustness methods for the classification of Whole Slide Images. We observe that ensembles of methods generally lead to better uncertainty estimates as well as an increased robustness towards domain shifts and label noise.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-01-03T11:34:36Z)
• Sparsity Agnostic Depth Completion [39.116228971420874]
  State-of-the-art approaches yield accurate results only when processing a specific density and distribution of input points. Our solution is robust to uneven distributions and extremely low densities never witnessed during training.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-12-01T18:59:46Z)
• Decorrelative Network Architecture for Robust Electrocardiogram Classification [4.808817930937323]
  It is not possible to train networks that are accurate in all scenarios. Deep learning methods sample the model parameter space to estimate uncertainty. These parameters are often subject to the same vulnerabilities, which can be exploited by adversarial attacks. We propose a novel ensemble approach based on feature decorrelation and Fourier partitioning for teaching networks diverse complementary features.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-07-19T02:36:36Z)
• ReDFeat: Recoupling Detection and Description for Multimodal Feature Learning [51.07496081296863]
  We recouple independent constraints of detection and description of multimodal feature learning with a mutual weighting strategy. We propose a detector that possesses a large receptive field and is equipped with learnable non-maximum suppression layers. We build a benchmark that contains cross visible, infrared, near-infrared and synthetic aperture radar image pairs for evaluating the performance of features in feature matching and image registration tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-05-16T04:24:22Z)
• Benchmarking Deep Models for Salient Object Detection [67.07247772280212]
  We construct a general SALient Object Detection (SALOD) benchmark to conduct a comprehensive comparison among several representative SOD methods. In the above experiments, we find that existing loss functions usually specialized in some metrics but reported inferior results on the others. We propose a novel Edge-Aware (EA) loss that promotes deep networks to learn more discriminative features by integrating both pixel- and image-level supervision signals.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-02-07T03:43:16Z)
• Revisiting Consistency Regularization for Semi-Supervised Learning [80.28461584135967]
  We propose an improved consistency regularization framework by a simple yet effective technique, FeatDistLoss. Experimental results show that our model defines a new state of the art for various datasets and settings.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-12-10T20:46:13Z)
• Deep Stable Learning for Out-Of-Distribution Generalization [27.437046504902938]
  Approaches based on deep neural networks have achieved striking performance when testing data and training data share similar distribution. Eliminating the impact of distribution shifts between training and testing data is crucial for building performance-promising deep models. We propose to address this problem by removing the dependencies between features via learning weights for training samples.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-04-16T03:54:21Z)
• Learning perturbation sets for robust machine learning [97.6757418136662]
  We use a conditional generator that defines the perturbation set over a constrained region of the latent space. We measure the quality of our learned perturbation sets both quantitatively and qualitatively. We leverage our learned perturbation sets to train models which are empirically and certifiably robust to adversarial image corruptions and adversarial lighting variations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-07-16T16:39:54Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.