A Decentralized Framework for Ethical Authorship Validation in Academic Publishing: Leveraging Self-Sovereign Identity and Blockchain Technology

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2508.01913v1
• Date: Sun, 03 Aug 2025 20:26:19 GMT
• Title: A Decentralized Framework for Ethical Authorship Validation in Academic Publishing: Leveraging Self-Sovereign Identity and Blockchain Technology
• Authors: Kamal Al-Sabahi, Yousuf Khamis Al Mabsali,
• Abstract summary: Unconsented authorship, gift authorship, author ambiguity, and undisclosed conflicts of interest threaten academic publishing.<n>This paper introduces a decentralized framework leveraging Self-Sovereign Identity (SSI) and blockchain technology.<n>A blockchain-based trust registry records authorship consent and peer-review activity immutably.<n>This work represents a step toward a more transparent, accountable, and trustworthy academic publishing ecosystem.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Academic publishing, integral to knowledge dissemination and scientific advancement, increasingly faces threats from unethical practices such as unconsented authorship, gift authorship, author ambiguity, and undisclosed conflicts of interest. While existing infrastructures like ORCID effectively disambiguate researcher identities, they fall short in enforcing explicit authorship consent, accurately verifying contributor roles, and robustly detecting conflicts of interest during peer review. To address these shortcomings, this paper introduces a decentralized framework leveraging Self-Sovereign Identity (SSI) and blockchain technology. The proposed model uses Decentralized Identifiers (DIDs) and Verifiable Credentials (VCs) to securely verify author identities and contributions, reducing ambiguity and ensuring accurate attribution. A blockchain-based trust registry records authorship consent and peer-review activity immutably. Privacy-preserving cryptographic techniques, especially Zero-Knowledge Proofs (ZKPs), support conflict-of-interest detection without revealing sensitive data. Verified authorship metadata and consent records are embedded in publications, increasing transparency. A stakeholder survey of researchers, editors, and reviewers suggests the framework improves ethical compliance and confidence in scholarly communication. This work represents a step toward a more transparent, accountable, and trustworthy academic publishing ecosystem.

Related papers

• Identity Theft in AI Conference Peer Review [50.18240135317708]
  We discuss newly uncovered cases of identity theft in the scientific peer-review process within artificial intelligence (AI) research.<n>We detail how dishonest researchers exploit the peer-review system by creating fraudulent reviewer profiles to manipulate paper evaluations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-08-06T02:36:52Z)
• The AI Imperative: Scaling High-Quality Peer Review in Machine Learning [49.87236114682497]
  We argue that AI-assisted peer review must become an urgent research and infrastructure priority.<n>We propose specific roles for AI in enhancing factual verification, guiding reviewer performance, assisting authors in quality improvement, and supporting ACs in decision-making.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-09T18:37:14Z)
• Towards Privacy-Preserving Revocation of Verifiable Credentials with Time-Flexibility [0.36832029288386137]
  Self-Sovereign Identity (SSI) is an emerging paradigm for authentication and credential presentation.<n>The EUDI Digital Identity wallet is about to become a concrete implementation of this paradigm.<n>We propose the basis of a novel method that customizes the use of anonymous hierarchical identity-based encryption.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-27T21:58:32Z)
• SoK: Bridging Trust into the Blockchain. A Systematic Review on On-Chain Identity [0.0]
  This systematic review explores the current status, identifies research gaps, and outlines future research directions for establishing trusted and privacy-compliant identities on the blockchain. A systematic search term was applied across various scientific databases, collecting 2232 potentially relevant research papers. The results of the selected studies have provided insightful findings on the mechanisms of on-chain identities.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-24T13:42:46Z)
• It Takes Two: A Peer-Prediction Solution for Blockchain Verifier's Dilemma [12.663727952216476]
  We develop a Byzantine-robust peer prediction framework towards the design of one-phase Bayesian truthful mechanisms for the decentralized verification games.<n>Our study provides a framework of incentive design for decentralized verification protocols that enhances the security and robustness of the blockchain.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-03T21:21:17Z)
• JAMDEC: Unsupervised Authorship Obfuscation using Constrained Decoding over Small Language Models [53.83273575102087]
  We propose an unsupervised inference-time approach to authorship obfuscation. We introduce JAMDEC, a user-controlled, inference-time algorithm for authorship obfuscation. Our approach builds on small language models such as GPT2-XL in order to help avoid disclosing the original content to proprietary LLM's APIs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-13T19:54:29Z)
• Combining Decentralized IDentifiers with Proof of Membership to Enable Trust in IoT Networks [44.99833362998488]
  The paper proposes and discusses an alternative (mutual) authentication process for IoT nodes under the same administration domain. The main idea is to combine the Decentralized IDentifier (DID)-based verification of private key ownership with the verification of a proof that the DID belongs to an evolving trusted set.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-12T09:33:50Z)
• Defending Against Authorship Identification Attacks [9.148691357200216]
  Authorship identification has proven unsettlingly effective in inferring the identity of the author of an unsigned document. The presented work offers a comprehensive review of the advancements in this research area spanning over the past two decades and beyond.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-02T19:03:11Z)
• FedSOV: Federated Model Secure Ownership Verification with Unforgeable Signature [60.99054146321459]
  Federated learning allows multiple parties to collaborate in learning a global model without revealing private data. We propose a cryptographic signature-based federated learning model ownership verification scheme named FedSOV.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-10T12:10:02Z)
• Trustworthy Transparency by Design [57.67333075002697]
  We propose a transparency framework for software design, incorporating research on user trust and experience. Our framework enables developing software that incorporates transparency in its design.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-03-19T12:34:01Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.