BOOST: Bayesian Optimization with Optimal Kernel and Acquisition Function Selection Technique

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2508.02332v1
• Date: Mon, 04 Aug 2025 12:08:12 GMT
• Title: BOOST: Bayesian Optimization with Optimal Kernel and Acquisition Function Selection Technique
• Authors: Joon-Hyun Park, Mujin Cheon, Dong-Yeun Koh,
• Abstract summary: We propose a simple yet effective framework, BOOST, that automates the selection of kernel and acquisition function pairs.<n>BOOST predicts the performance of various kernel-acquisition function pairs and identifies the most suitable configuration before expensive evaluations.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: The performance of Bayesian optimization (BO), a highly sample-efficient method for expensive black-box problems, is critically governed by the selection of its hyperparameters, including the kernel and acquisition functions. This presents a challenge: an inappropriate combination of these can lead to poor performance and wasted evaluations. While individual improvements to kernel functions (e.g., tree-based kernels, deep kernel learning) and acquisition functions (e.g., multi-step lookahead, tree-based planning) have been explored, the joint and autonomous selection of the best pair of these fundamental hyperparameters has been overlooked. This forces practitioners to rely on heuristics or costly manual training. We propose a simple yet effective framework, BOOST (Bayesian Optimization with Optimal Kernel and Acquisition Function Selection Technique), that automates this selection. BOOST utilizes a lightweight, offline evaluation stage to predict the performance of various kernel-acquisition function pairs and identify the most suitable configuration before expensive evaluations. BOOST partitions data-in-hand into two subsets: a reference subset and a query subset, and it prepares all possible kernel-acquisition pairs from the user's chosen candidates. For each configuration, BOOST conducts internal BO runs using the reference subset, evaluating how effectively each pair guides the search toward the optimum in the unknown query subset, thereby identifying the configuration with the best retrospective performance for future optimization. Experiments on both synthetic benchmark functions and real-world hyperparameter optimization tasks demonstrate that BOOST consistently outperforms standard BO approaches with fixed hyperparameters, highlighting its effectiveness and robustness in diverse problem landscapes.

Related papers

• Poisson Process for Bayesian Optimization [126.51200593377739]
  We propose a ranking-based surrogate model based on the Poisson process and introduce an efficient BO framework, namely Poisson Process Bayesian Optimization (PoPBO) Compared to the classic GP-BO method, our PoPBO has lower costs and better robustness to noise, which is verified by abundant experiments.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-05T02:54:50Z)
• A General Framework for User-Guided Bayesian Optimization [51.96352579696041]
  We propose ColaBO, the first Bayesian-principled framework for prior beliefs beyond the typical kernel structure. We empirically demonstrate ColaBO's ability to substantially accelerate optimization when the prior information is accurate, and to retain approximately default performance when it is misleading.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-24T18:27:26Z)
• Generalizing Bayesian Optimization with Decision-theoretic Entropies [102.82152945324381]
  We consider a generalization of Shannon entropy from work in statistical decision theory. We first show that special cases of this entropy lead to popular acquisition functions used in BO procedures. We then show how alternative choices for the loss yield a flexible family of acquisition functions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-10-04T04:43:58Z)
• Pre-training helps Bayesian optimization too [49.28382118032923]
  We seek an alternative practice for setting functional priors. In particular, we consider the scenario where we have data from similar functions that allow us to pre-train a tighter distribution a priori. Our results show that our method is able to locate good hyper parameters at least 3 times more efficiently than the best competing methods.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-07-07T04:42:54Z)
• Tree ensemble kernels for Bayesian optimization with known constraints over mixed-feature spaces [54.58348769621782]
  Tree ensembles can be well-suited for black-box optimization tasks such as algorithm tuning and neural architecture search. Two well-known challenges in using tree ensembles for black-box optimization are (i) effectively quantifying model uncertainty for exploration and (ii) optimizing over the piece-wise constant acquisition function. Our framework performs as well as state-of-the-art methods for unconstrained black-box optimization over continuous/discrete features and outperforms competing methods for problems combining mixed-variable feature spaces and known input constraints.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-07-02T16:59:37Z)
• A Comparative study of Hyper-Parameter Optimization Tools [2.6097538974670935]
  We compare the performance of four python libraries, namely Optuna, Hyperopt, Optunity, and sequential model algorithm configuration (SMAC) We found that Optuna has better performance for CASH problem and NeurIPS black-box optimization challenge.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-01-17T14:49:36Z)
• Bayesian Optimization over Permutation Spaces [30.650753803587794]
  We propose and evaluate two algorithms for BO over Permutation Spaces (BOPS) We theoretically analyze the performance of BOPS-T to show that their regret grows sub-linearly. Our experiments on multiple synthetic and real-world benchmarks show that both BOPS-T and BOPS-H perform better than the state-of-the-art BO algorithm for spaces.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-12-02T08:20:50Z)
• Bayesian Optimization for auto-tuning GPU kernels [0.0]
  Finding optimal parameter configurations for GPU kernels is a non-trivial exercise for large search spaces, even when automated. We introduce a novel contextual exploration factor as well as new acquisition functions with improved scalability, combined with an informed function selection mechanism.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-11-26T11:26:26Z)
• Pre-trained Gaussian Processes for Bayesian Optimization [24.730678780782647]
  We propose a new pre-training based BO framework named HyperBO. We show bounded posterior predictions and near-zero regrets for HyperBO without assuming the "ground truth" GP prior is known.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-09-16T20:46:26Z)
• BOSH: Bayesian Optimization by Sampling Hierarchically [10.10241176664951]
  We propose a novel BO routine pairing a hierarchical Gaussian process with an information-theoretic framework to generate a growing pool of realizations. We demonstrate that BOSH provides more efficient and higher-precision optimization than standard BO across synthetic benchmarks, simulation optimization, reinforcement learning and hyper- parameter tuning tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-07-02T07:35:49Z)
• Incorporating Expert Prior in Bayesian Optimisation via Space Warping [54.412024556499254]
  In big search spaces the algorithm goes through several low function value regions before reaching the optimum of the function. One approach to subside this cold start phase is to use prior knowledge that can accelerate the optimisation. In this paper, we represent the prior knowledge about the function optimum through a prior distribution. The prior distribution is then used to warp the search space in such a way that space gets expanded around the high probability region of function optimum and shrinks around low probability region of optimum.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-03-27T06:18:49Z)
• Towards Automatic Bayesian Optimization: A first step involving acquisition functions [0.0]
  Bayesian optimization is the state of the art technique for the optimization of black boxes, i.e., functions where we do not have access to their analytical expression. We propose a first attempt over automatic bayesian optimization by exploring several techniques that automatically tune the acquisition function.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-03-21T12:22:45Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.