Tell Me Without Telling Me: Two-Way Prediction of Visualization Literacy and Visual Attention

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2508.03713v1
• Date: Tue, 22 Jul 2025 20:18:45 GMT
• Title: Tell Me Without Telling Me: Two-Way Prediction of Visualization Literacy and Visual Attention
• Abstract summary: We show that distinct attention patterns in visual data exploration can correlate with participants' literacy levels.<n>We propose two computational models leveraging these insights: Lit2Sal and Sal2Lit.
• Score: 20.87674676293376
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Accounting for individual differences can improve the effectiveness of visualization design. While the role of visual attention in visualization interpretation is well recognized, existing work often overlooks how this behavior varies based on visual literacy levels. Based on data from a 235-participant user study covering three visualization tests (mini-VLAT, CALVI, and SGL), we show that distinct attention patterns in visual data exploration can correlate with participants' literacy levels: While experts (high-scorers) generally show a strong attentional focus, novices (low-scorers) focus less and explore more. We then propose two computational models leveraging these insights: Lit2Sal -- a novel visual saliency model that predicts observer attention given their visualization literacy level, and Sal2Lit -- a model to predict visual literacy from human visual attention data. Our quantitative and qualitative evaluation demonstrates that Lit2Sal outperforms state-of-the-art saliency models with literacy-aware considerations. Sal2Lit predicts literacy with 86% accuracy using a single attention map, providing a time-efficient supplement to literacy assessment that only takes less than a minute. Taken together, our unique approach to consider individual differences in salience models and visual attention in literacy assessments paves the way for new directions in personalized visual data communication to enhance understanding.

Related papers

• Visual Attention Faithfulness in Vision-Language Models is Heterogeneous [13.117582974793672]
  We show that visual attention faithfulness is heterogeneous, manifesting in three distinct processing modes.<n>Human-annotated ground-truth regions satisfy comprehensiveness in only $sim 60$% of cases compared with model attention rankings.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-09-01T07:32:01Z)
• Disentangling Visual and Factual Correctness in LVLMs' Visualization Literacy [27.323597665236644]
  Large Vision-Language Models (LVLMs) show strong visualization interpretation.<n>It is unclear whether their responses reflect genuine reasoning over visual evidence or factual priors learned during training.<n>We present a framework that isolates visual correctness from factual correctness.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-06-02T04:36:32Z)
• VLM2-Bench: A Closer Look at How Well VLMs Implicitly Link Explicit Matching Visual Cues [34.95077625513563]
  We introduce textbfVLM2-Bench, a benchmark designed to assess whether vision-language models can Visually Link Matching cues.<n> Comprehensive evaluation across twelve VLMs, along with further analysis of various language-side and vision-side prompting methods, leads to a total of eight key findings.<n>We identify critical challenges in models' ability to link visual cues, highlighting a significant performance gap.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-17T17:57:50Z)
• PAINT: Paying Attention to INformed Tokens to Mitigate Hallucination in Large Vision-Language Model [0.0]
  hallucinations often arise from the progressive weakening of attention weight to visual tokens.<n>textbfPAINT (textbfPaying textbfAttention to textbfINformed textbfTokens) is a plug-and-play framework that intervenes in the self-attention mechanism of the Large Vision Language Models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-01-21T15:22:31Z)
• Unveiling Visual Perception in Language Models: An Attention Head Analysis Approach [33.20992355312175]
  Recent advancements in Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) have demonstrated remarkable progress in visual understanding.<n>This paper aims to address this question with systematic investigation across 4 model families and 4 model scales.<n>Our analysis reveals a strong correlation between the behavior of these attention heads, the distribution of attention weights, and their concentration on visual tokens within the input.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-12-24T02:31:24Z)
• Localization vs. Semantics: Visual Representations in Unimodal and Multimodal Models [57.08925810659545]
  We conduct a comparative analysis of the visual representations in existing vision-and-language models and vision-only models. Our empirical observations suggest that vision-and-language models are better at label prediction tasks. We hope our study sheds light on the role of language in visual learning, and serves as an empirical guide for various pretrained models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-12-01T05:00:18Z)
• SgVA-CLIP: Semantic-guided Visual Adapting of Vision-Language Models for Few-shot Image Classification [84.05253637260743]
  We propose a new framework, named Semantic-guided Visual Adapting (SgVA), to extend vision-language pre-trained models. SgVA produces discriminative task-specific visual features by comprehensively using a vision-specific contrastive loss, a cross-modal contrastive loss, and an implicit knowledge distillation. State-of-the-art results on 13 datasets demonstrate that the adapted visual features can well complement the cross-modal features to improve few-shot image classification.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-11-28T14:58:15Z)
• Visual Perturbation-aware Collaborative Learning for Overcoming the Language Prior Problem [60.0878532426877]
  We propose a novel collaborative learning scheme from the viewpoint of visual perturbation calibration. Specifically, we devise a visual controller to construct two sorts of curated images with different perturbation extents. The experimental results on two diagnostic VQA-CP benchmark datasets evidently demonstrate its effectiveness.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-07-24T23:50:52Z)
• Learnable Visual Words for Interpretable Image Recognition [70.85686267987744]
  We propose the Learnable Visual Words (LVW) to interpret the model prediction behaviors with two novel modules. The semantic visual words learning relaxes the category-specific constraint, enabling the general visual words shared across different categories. Our experiments on six visual benchmarks demonstrate the superior effectiveness of our proposed LVW in both accuracy and model interpretation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-05-22T03:24:45Z)
• From Two to One: A New Scene Text Recognizer with Visual Language Modeling Network [70.47504933083218]
  We propose a Visual Language Modeling Network (VisionLAN), which views the visual and linguistic information as a union. VisionLAN significantly improves the speed by 39% and adaptively considers the linguistic information to enhance the visual features for accurate recognition.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-08-22T07:56:24Z)
• Heterogeneous Contrastive Learning: Encoding Spatial Information for Compact Visual Representations [183.03278932562438]
  This paper presents an effective approach that adds spatial information to the encoding stage to alleviate the learning inconsistency between the contrastive objective and strong data augmentation operations. We show that our approach achieves higher efficiency in visual representations and thus delivers a key message to inspire the future research of self-supervised visual representation learning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-11-19T16:26:25Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.