Active Learning and Transfer Learning for Anomaly Detection in Time-Series Data

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2508.03921v1
• Date: Tue, 05 Aug 2025 21:30:41 GMT
• Title: Active Learning and Transfer Learning for Anomaly Detection in Time-Series Data
• Authors: John D. Kelleher, Matthew Nicholson, Rahul Agrahari, Clare Conran,
• Abstract summary: This paper examines the effectiveness of combining active learning and transfer learning for anomaly detection in cross-domain time-series data.<n>We find that adding new samples to the training set using active learning does improve model performance but that in general, the rate of improvement is slower than the results reported in the literature suggest.
• Score: 1.3271317049666105
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: This paper examines the effectiveness of combining active learning and transfer learning for anomaly detection in cross-domain time-series data. Our results indicate that there is an interaction between clustering and active learning and in general the best performance is achieved using a single cluster (in other words when clustering is not applied). Also, we find that adding new samples to the training set using active learning does improve model performance but that in general, the rate of improvement is slower than the results reported in the literature suggest. We attribute this difference to an improved experimental design where distinct data samples are used for the sampling and testing pools. Finally, we assess the ceiling performance of transfer learning in combination with active learning across several datasets and find that performance does initially improve but eventually begins to tail off as more target points are selected for inclusion in training. This tail-off in performance may indicate that the active learning process is doing a good job of sequencing data points for selection, pushing the less useful points towards the end of the selection process and that this tail-off occurs when these less useful points are eventually added. Taken together our results indicate that active learning is effective but that the improvement in model performance follows a linear flat function concerning the number of points selected and labelled.

Related papers

• Data curation via joint example selection further accelerates multimodal learning [3.329535792151987]
  We show that jointly selecting batches of data is more effective for learning than selecting examples independently. We derive a simple and tractable algorithm for selecting such batches, which significantly accelerate training beyond individually-prioritized data points.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-25T16:52:37Z)
• Exploring Learning Complexity for Efficient Downstream Dataset Pruning [8.990878450631596]
  Existing dataset pruning methods require training on the entire dataset.<n>We propose a straightforward, novel, and training-free hardness score named Distorting-based Learning Complexity (DLC)<n>Our method is motivated by the observation that easy samples learned faster can also be learned with fewer parameters.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-08T02:29:33Z)
• Fast Classification with Sequential Feature Selection in Test Phase [1.1470070927586016]
  This paper introduces a novel approach to active feature acquisition for classification. It is the task of sequentially selecting the most informative subset of features to achieve optimal prediction performance. The proposed approach involves a new lazy model that is significantly faster and more efficient compared to existing methods.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-25T21:31:46Z)
• Multi-Task Self-Supervised Time-Series Representation Learning [3.31490164885582]
  Time-series representation learning can extract representations from data with temporal dynamics and sparse labels. We propose a new time-series representation learning method by combining the advantages of self-supervised tasks. We evaluate the proposed framework on three downstream tasks: time-series classification, forecasting, and anomaly detection.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-03-02T07:44:06Z)
• Revisiting Deep Active Learning for Semantic Segmentation [37.3546941940388]
  We show that the data distribution is decisive for the performance of the various active learning objectives proposed in the literature. We demonstrate that the integration of semi-supervised learning with active learning can improve performance when the two objectives are aligned.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-02-08T14:23:37Z)
• Temporal Output Discrepancy for Loss Estimation-based Active Learning [65.93767110342502]
  We present a novel deep active learning approach that queries the oracle for data annotation when the unlabeled sample is believed to incorporate high loss. Our approach achieves superior performances than the state-of-the-art active learning methods on image classification and semantic segmentation tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-12-20T19:29:37Z)
• ALLSH: Active Learning Guided by Local Sensitivity and Hardness [98.61023158378407]
  We propose to retrieve unlabeled samples with a local sensitivity and hardness-aware acquisition function. Our method achieves consistent gains over the commonly used active learning strategies in various classification tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-05-10T15:39:11Z)
• Compactness Score: A Fast Filter Method for Unsupervised Feature Selection [66.84571085643928]
  We propose a fast unsupervised feature selection method, named as, Compactness Score (CSUFS) to select desired features. Our proposed algorithm seems to be more accurate and efficient compared with existing algorithms.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-01-31T13:01:37Z)
• Mind Your Outliers! Investigating the Negative Impact of Outliers on Active Learning for Visual Question Answering [71.15403434929915]
  We show that across 5 models and 4 datasets on the task of visual question answering, a wide variety of active learning approaches fail to outperform random selection. We identify the problem as collective outliers -- groups of examples that active learning methods prefer to acquire but models fail to learn. We show that active learning sample efficiency increases significantly as the number of collective outliers in the active learning pool decreases.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-07-06T00:52:11Z)
• Data Shapley Valuation for Efficient Batch Active Learning [21.76249748709411]
  Active Data Shapley (ADS) is a filtering layer for batch active learning. We show that ADS is particularly effective when the pool of unlabeled data exhibits real-world caveats.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-04-16T18:53:42Z)
• Semi-supervised Batch Active Learning via Bilevel Optimization [89.37476066973336]
  We formulate our approach as a data summarization problem via bilevel optimization. We show that our method is highly effective in keyword detection tasks in the regime when only few labeled samples are available.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-10-19T16:53:24Z)
• Improving Multi-Turn Response Selection Models with Complementary Last-Utterance Selection by Instance Weighting [84.9716460244444]
  We consider utilizing the underlying correlation in the data resource itself to derive different kinds of supervision signals. We conduct extensive experiments in two public datasets and obtain significant improvement in both datasets.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-02-18T06:29:01Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.