Experimental Analysis of Productive Interaction Strategy with ChatGPT: User Study on Function and Project-level Code Generation Tasks

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2508.04125v1
• Date: Wed, 06 Aug 2025 06:48:48 GMT
• Title: Experimental Analysis of Productive Interaction Strategy with ChatGPT: User Study on Function and Project-level Code Generation Tasks
• Authors: Sangwon Hyun, Hyunjun Kim, Jinhyuk Jang, Hyojin Choi, M. Ali Babar,
• Abstract summary: This study investigates the impact of Human-LLM Interactions (HLI) features on code generation productivity.<n>Three out of 15 HLI features significantly impacted the productivity in code generation.<n>A taxonomy of 29 runtime and logic errors can occur during HLI processes, along with suggested mitigation plans.
• Score: 5.659969270836789
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/
• Abstract: The application of Large Language Models (LLMs) is growing in the productive completion of Software Engineering tasks. Yet, studies investigating the productive prompting techniques often employed a limited problem space, primarily focusing on well-known prompting patterns and mainly targeting function-level SE practices. We identify significant gaps in real-world workflows that involve complexities beyond class-level (e.g., multi-class dependencies) and different features that can impact Human-LLM Interactions (HLIs) processes in code generation. To address these issues, we designed an experiment that comprehensively analyzed the HLI features regarding the code generation productivity. Our study presents two project-level benchmark tasks, extending beyond function-level evaluations. We conducted a user study with 36 participants from diverse backgrounds, asking them to solve the assigned tasks by interacting with the GPT assistant using specific prompting patterns. We also examined the participants' experience and their behavioral features during interactions by analyzing screen recordings and GPT chat logs. Our statistical and empirical investigation revealed (1) that three out of 15 HLI features significantly impacted the productivity in code generation; (2) five primary guidelines for enhancing productivity for HLI processes; and (3) a taxonomy of 29 runtime and logic errors that can occur during HLI processes, along with suggested mitigation plans.

Related papers

• Evaluating the Effectiveness of Large Language Models in Solving Simple Programming Tasks: A User-Centered Study [1.0467092641687232]
  This study investigates how different interaction styles with ChatGPT-4o affect user performance on simple programming tasks.<n>I conducted a within-subjects experiment where fifteen high school students completed three problems under three distinct versions of the model.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-07-05T13:52:31Z)
• Cross-Task Experiential Learning on LLM-based Multi-Agent Collaboration [63.90193684394165]
  We introduce multi-agent cross-task experiential learning (MAEL), a novel framework that endows LLM-driven agents with explicit cross-task learning and experience accumulation.<n>During the experiential learning phase, we quantify the quality for each step in the task-solving workflow and store the resulting rewards.<n>During inference, agents retrieve high-reward, task-relevant experiences as few-shot examples to enhance the effectiveness of each reasoning step.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-29T07:24:37Z)
• A Survey of Frontiers in LLM Reasoning: Inference Scaling, Learning to Reason, and Agentic Systems [93.8285345915925]
  Reasoning is a fundamental cognitive process that enables logical inference, problem-solving, and decision-making.<n>With the rapid advancement of large language models (LLMs), reasoning has emerged as a key capability that distinguishes advanced AI systems.<n>We categorize existing methods along two dimensions: (1) Regimes, which define the stage at which reasoning is achieved; and (2) Architectures, which determine the components involved in the reasoning process.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-12T01:27:49Z)
• Use Me Wisely: AI-Driven Assessment for LLM Prompting Skills Development [5.559706293891474]
  Large language model (LLM)-powered chatbots have become popular across various domains, supporting a range of tasks and processes.<n>Yet, prompting is highly task- and domain-dependent, limiting the effectiveness of generic approaches.<n>In this study, we explore whether LLM-based methods can facilitate learning assessments by using ad-hoc guidelines and a minimal number of annotated prompt samples.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-04T11:56:33Z)
• Interaction2Code: Benchmarking MLLM-based Interactive Webpage Code Generation from Interactive Prototyping [57.024913536420264]
  Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) have demonstrated remarkable performance on the design-to-code task.<n>We present the first systematic investigation of MLLMs in generating interactive webpages.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-05T17:40:03Z)
• Understanding the Human-LLM Dynamic: A Literature Survey of LLM Use in Programming Tasks [0.850206009406913]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) are transforming programming practices, offering significant capabilities for code generation activities. This paper focuses on their use in programming tasks, drawing insights from user studies that assess the impact of LLMs on programming tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-01T19:34:46Z)
• Rocks Coding, Not Development--A Human-Centric, Experimental Evaluation of LLM-Supported SE Tasks [9.455579863269714]
  We examined whether and to what degree working with ChatGPT was helpful in the coding task and typical software development task. We found that while ChatGPT performed well in solving simple coding problems, its performance in supporting typical software development tasks was not that good. Our study thus provides first-hand insights into using ChatGPT to fulfill software engineering tasks with real-world developers.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-08T13:07:31Z)
• The Shifted and The Overlooked: A Task-oriented Investigation of User-GPT Interactions [114.67699010359637]
  We analyze a large-scale collection of real user queries to GPT. We find that tasks such as design'' and planning'' are prevalent in user interactions but are largely neglected or different from traditional NLP benchmarks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-19T02:12:17Z)
• Pushing the Limits of ChatGPT on NLP Tasks [79.17291002710517]
  Despite the success of ChatGPT, its performances on most NLP tasks are still well below the supervised baselines. In this work, we looked into the causes, and discovered that its subpar performance was caused by the following factors. We propose a collection of general modules to address these issues, in an attempt to push the limits of ChatGPT on NLP tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-16T09:40:05Z)
• Pre-training Multi-task Contrastive Learning Models for Scientific Literature Understanding [52.723297744257536]
  Pre-trained language models (LMs) have shown effectiveness in scientific literature understanding tasks. We propose a multi-task contrastive learning framework, SciMult, to facilitate common knowledge sharing across different literature understanding tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-23T16:47:22Z)
• Task-Agnostic Continual Reinforcement Learning: Gaining Insights and Overcoming Challenges [27.474011433615317]
  Continual learning (CL) enables the development of models and agents that learn from a sequence of tasks. We investigate the factors that contribute to the performance differences between task-agnostic CL and multi-task (MTL) agents.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-05-28T17:59:00Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.