An Overview of 7726 User Reports: Uncovering SMS Scams and Scammer Strategies

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2508.05276v1
• Date: Thu, 07 Aug 2025 11:19:01 GMT
• Title: An Overview of 7726 User Reports: Uncovering SMS Scams and Scammer Strategies
• Authors: Sharad Agarwal, Guillermo Suarez-Tangil, Marie Vasek,
• Abstract summary: We find 89.16% of user reports comprise text messages, followed by reports of suspicious calls and URLs.<n>We identify 35.12% of the unique text messages reported by users as spam, while 40.27% are scam text messages.<n>Our paper classifies the identified scam text messages into 12 scam types, of which the most popular is 'wrong number' scams.
• Score: 4.332487675198732
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Mobile network operators implement firewalls to stop illicit messages, but scammers find ways to evade detection. Previous work has looked into SMS texts that are blocked by these firewalls. However, there is little insight into SMS texts that bypass them and reach users. To this end, we collaborate with a major mobile network operator to receive 1.35m user reports submitted over four months. We find 89.16% of user reports comprise text messages, followed by reports of suspicious calls and URLs. Using our methodological framework, we identify 35.12% of the unique text messages reported by users as spam, while 40.27% are scam text messages. This is the first paper that investigates SMS reports submitted by users and differentiates between spam and scams. Our paper classifies the identified scam text messages into 12 scam types, of which the most popular is 'wrong number' scams. We explore the various infrastructure services that scammers abuse to conduct SMS scams, including mobile network operators and hosting infrastructure, and analyze the text of the scam messages to understand how scammers lure victims into providing them with their personal or financial details.

Related papers

• Detection and Prevention of Smishing Attacks [0.0]
  This work presents a smishing detection model using a content-based analysis approach.<n>To address the challenge posed by slang, abbreviations, and short forms in text communication, the model normalizes these into standard forms.<n> Experimental results demonstrate the model effectiveness, achieving classification accuracies of 97.14% for smishing and 96.12% for ham messages.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-12-31T04:07:12Z)
• (Blind) Users Really Do Heed Aural Telephone Scam Warnings [42.93674984678535]
  We explore how two groups of individuals, legally blind (n=36) and sighted ones (n=36) react to aural telephone scam warnings in naturalistic settings.<n>We developed an aural variant of telephone scam warnings and tested them in three conditions: baseline (no warning), short warning, and contextual warning that preceded the scam's content.<n>Both the legally blind and the sighted participants found the contextual warnings as powerful usable security cues.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-12-05T09:47:38Z)
• Exposing LLM Vulnerabilities: Adversarial Scam Detection and Performance [16.9071617169937]
  This paper investigates the vulnerabilities of Large Language Models (LLMs) when facing adversarial scam messages for the task of scam detection.<n>We created a comprehensive dataset with fine-grained labels of scam messages, including both original and adversarial scam messages.<n>Our analysis showed how adversarial examples took advantage of vulnerabilities of a LLM, leading to high misclassification rate.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-12-01T00:13:28Z)
• Jäger: Automated Telephone Call Traceback [45.67265362470739]
  We introduce J"ager, a distributed secure call traceback system. J"ager can trace a call in a few seconds, even with partial deployment.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-09-04T16:09:28Z)
• SpamDam: Towards Privacy-Preserving and Adversary-Resistant SMS Spam Detection [2.0355793807035094]
  SpamDam is a SMS spam detection framework designed to overcome key challenges in detecting and understanding SMS spam. We have compiled over 76K SMS spam messages from Twitter and Weibo between 2018 and 2023, forming the largest dataset of its kind. We have rigorously tested the adversarial robustness of SMS spam detection models, introducing the novel reverse backdoor attack.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-15T06:07:10Z)
• Commercial Anti-Smishing Tools and Their Comparative Effectiveness Against Modern Threats [0.0]
  We developed a test bed for measuring the effectiveness of popular anti-smishing tools against fresh smishing attacks. Most anti-phishing apps and bulk messaging services didn't filter smishing messages beyond the carrier blocking. While carriers did not block any benign messages, they were only able to reach a 25-35% blocking rate for smishing messages.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-09-14T06:08:22Z)
• Preliminary Results from a U.S. Demographic Analysis of SMiSh Susceptibility [1.8416014644193066]
  The text method is called SMiShing, (aka SMShing, or smishing) A fraudster sends a phishing link via Short Message Service (SMS) text to a phone. No data exists on who is most vulnerable to SMiShing.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-09-12T15:32:36Z)
• Verifying the Robustness of Automatic Credibility Assessment [50.55687778699995]
  We show that meaning-preserving changes in input text can mislead the models. We also introduce BODEGA: a benchmark for testing both victim models and attack methods on misinformation detection tasks. Our experimental results show that modern large language models are often more vulnerable to attacks than previous, smaller solutions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-03-14T16:11:47Z)
• Uncovering the Dark Side of Telegram: Fakes, Clones, Scams, and Conspiracy Movements [56.49045238318727]
  We perform a large-scale analysis of Telegram by collecting 35,382 different channels and over 130,000,000 messages.<n>We find some of the infamous activities also present on privacy-preserving services of the Dark Web, such as carding.<n>We propose a machine learning model that is able to identify fake channels with an accuracy of 86%.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-11-26T14:53:31Z)
• Deep convolutional forest: a dynamic deep ensemble approach for spam detection in text [219.15486286590016]
  This paper introduces a dynamic deep ensemble model for spam detection that adjusts its complexity and extracts features automatically. As a result, the model achieved high precision, recall, f1-score and accuracy of 98.38%.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-10-10T17:19:37Z)
• Forensic Authorship Analysis of Microblogging Texts Using N-Grams and Stylometric Features [63.48764893706088]
  This work aims at identifying authors of tweet messages, which are limited to 280 characters. We use for our experiments a self-captured database of 40 users, with 120 to 200 tweets per user. Results using this small set are promising, with the different features providing a classification accuracy between 92% and 98.5%.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-03-24T19:32:11Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.