Optimizing Districting Plans to Maximize Majority-Minority Districts via IPs and Local Search

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2508.07446v2
• Date: Thu, 04 Sep 2025 20:25:50 GMT
• Title: Optimizing Districting Plans to Maximize Majority-Minority Districts via IPs and Local Search
• Authors: Daniel Brous, David Shmoys,
• Abstract summary: In redistricting litigation, effective enforcement of the Voting Rights Act has often involved providing the court with districting plans that display a larger number of majority-minority districts than the current proposal.<n>We propose a new hierarchical column generation algorithm to find plans via integer programming that outperforms short bursts on multiple data sets in generating statewide plans with significantly more majority-minority districts.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: In redistricting litigation, effective enforcement of the Voting Rights Act has often involved providing the court with districting plans that display a larger number of majority-minority districts than the current proposal (as was true, for example, in what followed Allen v. Milligan concerning the congressional districting plan for Alabama in 2023). Recent work by Cannon et al. proposed a heuristic algorithm for generating plans to optimize majority-minority districts, which they called short bursts; that algorithm relies on a sophisticated random walk over the space of all plans, transitioning in bursts, where the initial plan for each burst is the most successful plan from the previous burst. We propose a method based on integer programming, where we build upon another previous work, the stochastic hierarchical partitioning algorithm, which heuristically generates a robust set of potential districts (viewed as columns in a standard set partitioning formulation); that approach was designed to optimize a different notion of fairness across a statewide plan. We design a new column generation algorithm to find plans via integer programming that outperforms short bursts on multiple data sets in generating statewide plans with significantly more majority-minority districts. These results also rely on a new local re-optimization algorithm to iteratively improve on any baseline solution, as well as an algorithm to increase the compactness of districts in plans generated (without impacting the number of majority-minority districts).

Related papers

• Reinforcement learning with combinatorial actions for coupled restless bandits [62.89013331120493]
  We propose SEQUOIA, an RL algorithm that directly optimize for long-term reward over the feasible action space.<n>We empirically validate SEQUOIA on four novel restless bandit problems with constraints: multiple interventions, path constraints, bipartite matching, and capacity constraints.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-01T21:25:21Z)
• Multiscale Parallel Tempering for Fast Sampling on Redistricting Plans [1.1233768932957773]
  A persuasive method is to compare the plan with an ensemble of neutrally drawn redistricting plans. To audit the partisan difference between the ensemble and a given plan, one must ensure that the non-partisan criteria are matched. In this work, we generate a multiscale parallel tempering approach that makes local moves at each scale.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-01-30T21:33:05Z)
• Simple Opinion Dynamics for No-Regret Learning [38.61048016579232]
  We study a cooperative multi-agent bandit setting in the distributed GOSSIP model. We introduce and analyze families of memoryless and time-independent protocols for this setting. For stationary reward settings, we prove for the first time that these simple protocols exhibit best-of-both-worlds behavior.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-14T17:59:15Z)
• Spanning tree methods for sampling graph partitions [0.7658085223797904]
  A districting plan can be viewed as a balanced partition of a graph into connected subsets. RevReCom converges to the simple, natural distribution that ReCom was originally designed to approximate.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-10-04T06:18:33Z)
• Lower Bounds and Optimal Algorithms for Smooth and Strongly Convex Decentralized Optimization Over Time-Varying Networks [79.16773494166644]
  We consider the task of minimizing the sum of smooth and strongly convex functions stored in a decentralized manner across the nodes of a communication network. We design two optimal algorithms that attain these lower bounds. We corroborate the theoretical efficiency of these algorithms by performing an experimental comparison with existing state-of-the-art methods.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-06-08T15:54:44Z)
• Fairmandering: A column generation heuristic for fairness-optimized political districting [0.0]
  American winner-take-all congressional district system empowers politicians to engineer electoral outcomes by manipulating district boundaries. Existing computational solutions mostly focus on drawing unbiased maps by ignoring political and demographic input, and instead simply optimize for compactness. We claim that this is a flawed approach because compactness and fairness are qualities, and introduce a scalable two-stage method to explicitly optimize for arbitrary piecewise-linear definitions of fairness.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-03-21T19:22:42Z)
• Compactness statistics for spanning tree recombination [0.0]
  "ReCom" method produces plans with more compact districts than some other methods. We construct ensembles of 2-district plans for two grid graphs and for the precinct graph of Boulder County, CO. This is an important step towards understanding compactness properties for districting plans produced by the ReCom method.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-03-03T21:39:51Z)
• Community detection using fast low-cardinality semidefinite programming [94.4878715085334]
  We propose a new low-cardinality algorithm that generalizes the local update to maximize a semidefinite relaxation derived from Leiden-k-cut. This proposed algorithm is scalable, outperforms state-of-the-art algorithms, and outperforms in real-world time with little additional cost.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-12-04T15:46:30Z)
• Sequential Monte Carlo for Sampling Balanced and Compact Redistricting Plans [0.0]
  We present a new Sequential Monte Carlo (SMC) algorithm that generates a sample of redistricting plans converging to a realistic target distribution. We validate the accuracy of the proposed algorithm by using a small map where all redistricting plans can be enumerated. We then apply the SMC algorithm to evaluate the partisan implications of several maps submitted by relevant parties in a recent high-profile redistricting case in the state of Pennsylvania.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-08-13T23:26:34Z)
• FedPD: A Federated Learning Framework with Optimal Rates and Adaptivity to Non-IID Data [59.50904660420082]
  Federated Learning (FL) has become a popular paradigm for learning from distributed data. To effectively utilize data at different devices without moving them to the cloud, algorithms such as the Federated Averaging (FedAvg) have adopted a "computation then aggregation" (CTA) model.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-05-22T23:07:42Z)
• Divide-and-Conquer Monte Carlo Tree Search For Goal-Directed Planning [78.65083326918351]
  We consider alternatives to an implicit sequential planning assumption. We propose Divide-and-Conquer Monte Carlo Tree Search (DC-MCTS) for approximating the optimal plan. We show that this algorithmic flexibility over planning order leads to improved results in navigation tasks in grid-worlds.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-04-23T18:08:58Z)
• Decentralized MCTS via Learned Teammate Models [89.24858306636816]
  We present a trainable online decentralized planning algorithm based on decentralized Monte Carlo Tree Search. We show that deep learning and convolutional neural networks can be employed to produce accurate policy approximators.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-03-19T13:10:20Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.