Pareto Multi-Objective Alignment for Language Models

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2508.07768v1
• Date: Mon, 11 Aug 2025 08:54:14 GMT
• Title: Pareto Multi-Objective Alignment for Language Models
• Authors: Qiang He, Setareh Maghsudi,
• Abstract summary: Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly deployed in real-world applications that require careful balancing of multiple, often conflicting, objectives.<n>We propose a principled and computationally efficient algorithm designed explicitly for multi-objective alignment (MOA) in LLMs.<n>PAMA transforms multi-objective RLHF into a convex optimization with a closed-form solution, significantly enhancing scalability.
• Score: 7.9051473654430655
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly deployed in real-world applications that require careful balancing of multiple, often conflicting, objectives, such as informativeness versus conciseness, or helpfulness versus creativity. However, current alignment methods, primarily based on RLHF, optimize LLMs toward a single reward function, resulting in rigid behavior that fails to capture the complexity and diversity of human preferences. This limitation hinders the adaptability of LLMs to practical scenarios, making multi-objective alignment (MOA) a critical yet underexplored area. To bridge this gap, we propose Pareto Multi-Objective Alignment (PAMA), a principled and computationally efficient algorithm designed explicitly for MOA in LLMs. In contrast to computationally prohibitive multi-objective optimization (MOO) methods, PAMA transforms multi-objective RLHF into a convex optimization with a closed-form solution, significantly enhancing scalability. Traditional MOO approaches suffer from prohibitive O(n^2*d) complexity, where d represents the number of model parameters, typically in the billions for LLMs, rendering direct optimization infeasible. PAMA reduces this complexity to O(n) where n is the number of objectives, enabling optimization to be completed within milliseconds. We provide theoretical guarantees that PAMA converges to a Pareto stationary point, where no objective can be improved without degrading at least one other. Extensive experiments across language models ranging from 125M to 7B parameters demonstrate PAMA's robust and effective MOA capabilities, aligning with its theoretical advantages. PAMA provides a highly efficient solution to the MOA problem that was previously considered intractable, offering a practical and theoretically grounded approach to aligning LLMs with diverse human values, paving the way for versatile and adaptable real-world AI deployments.

Related papers

• Multi-Paradigm Collaborative Adversarial Attack Against Multi-Modal Large Language Models [67.45032003041399]
  We propose a novel Multi-Paradigm Collaborative Attack (MPCAttack) framework to boost the transferability of adversarial examples against MLLMs.<n>MPCO adaptively balances the importance of different paradigm representations and guides the global optimisation.<n>Our solution consistently outperforms state-of-the-art methods in both targeted and untargeted attacks on open-source and closed-source MLLMs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-03-05T06:01:26Z)
• Multi-Objective Hierarchical Optimization with Large Language Models [41.41567058185742]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) are not the off-the-shelf choice to drive multi-objective optimization yet.<n>In this paper, we close this gap by leveraging LLMs as surrogate models and candidate samplers inside a structured hierarchical search strategy.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-20T12:10:13Z)
• Parametric Pareto Set Learning for Expensive Multi-Objective Optimization [16.780031024741223]
  Parametric multi-objective optimization (PMO) addresses the challenge of solving an infinite family of multi-objective optimization problems.<n>Traditional methods require re-execution for each parameter configuration, leading to prohibitive costs when objective evaluations are computationally expensive.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-11-08T03:05:28Z)
• LLM4CMO: Large Language Model-aided Algorithm Design for Constrained Multiobjective Optimization [54.35609820607923]
  Large language models (LLMs) offer new opportunities for assisting with algorithm design.<n>We propose LLM4CMO, a novel CMOEA based on a dual-population, two-stage framework.<n>LLMs can serve as efficient co-designers in the development of complex evolutionary optimization algorithms.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-08-16T02:00:57Z)
• Alignment of large language models with constrained learning [93.2264691508005]
  We study the problem of computing an optimal large language model (LLM) policy for a constrained alignment problem.<n>We employ Lagrangian duality to develop an iterative dual-based alignment method that alternates between updating the policy via Lagrangian and updating a dual variable via dual descent.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-26T01:04:56Z)
• Multi-Objective Preference Optimization: Improving Human Alignment of Generative Models [15.799929216215672]
  We introduce the Multi-Objective Preference Optimization (MOPO) algorithm, which frames alignment as a constrained KL-regularized optimization.<n>Unlike prior work, MOPO operates directly on pairwise preference data, requires no point-wise reward assumption, and avoids prompt-context engineering.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-16T05:58:26Z)
• UC-MOA: Utility-Conditioned Multi-Objective Alignment for Distributional Pareto-Optimality [52.49062565901046]
  Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback (RLHF) has become a cornerstone for aligning large language models with human values.<n>Existing approaches struggle to capture the multi-dimensional, distributional nuances of human preferences.<n>We introduce Utility-Conditioned Multi-Objective Alignment (UC-MOA), a novel framework that overcomes these limitations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-10T09:52:42Z)
• Pareto Set Learning for Multi-Objective Reinforcement Learning [19.720934024901542]
  We propose a decomposition-based framework for Multi-Objective RL (MORL)<n>PSL-MORL harnesses the generation capability of hypernetwork to produce the parameters of the policy network for each decomposition weight.<n>We show that PSL-MORL significantly outperforms state-of-the-art MORL methods in the hypervolume and sparsity indicators.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-01-12T10:43:05Z)
• Few-shot Steerable Alignment: Adapting Rewards and LLM Policies with Neural Processes [50.544186914115045]
  Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly embedded in everyday applications.<n> Ensuring their alignment with the diverse preferences of individual users has become a critical challenge.<n>We present a novel framework for few-shot steerable alignment.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-12-18T16:14:59Z)
• Multi-Reference Preference Optimization for Large Language Models [56.84730239046117]
  We introduce a novel closed-form formulation for direct preference optimization using multiple reference models. The resulting algorithm, Multi-Reference Preference Optimization (MRPO), leverages broader prior knowledge from diverse reference models. Our experiments demonstrate that LLMs finetuned with MRPO generalize better in various preference data, regardless of data scarcity or abundance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-26T00:29:04Z)
• Beyond One-Preference-Fits-All Alignment: Multi-Objective Direct Preference Optimization [76.09576643028362]
  We present Multi-Objective Direct Preference Optimization (MODPO) for multiple alignment objectives. MODPO folds language modeling directly into reward modeling, training language models as implicit collective reward models. It theoretically yields the same optimal solutions as MORLHF but is practically more stable and efficient.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-05T17:35:26Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.