EvoCoT: Overcoming the Exploration Bottleneck in Reinforcement Learning
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2508.07809v4
- Date: Tue, 23 Sep 2025 05:59:37 GMT
- Title: EvoCoT: Overcoming the Exploration Bottleneck in Reinforcement Learning
- Authors: Huanyu Liu, Jia Li, Chang Yu, Taozhi Chen, Yihong Dong, Lecheng Wang, XiaoLong Hu, Ge Li,
- Abstract summary: Reinforcement learning with verifiable reward (RLVR) has become a promising paradigm for post-training large language models (LLMs) to improve their reasoning capability.<n>We propose EvoCoT, a self-evolving curriculum learning framework based on two-stage chain-of-thought (CoT) reasoning optimization.<n>EvoCoT constrains the exploration space by self-generating and verifying CoT trajectories, then gradually shortens CoT steps to expand the space in a controlled way.
- Score: 25.518032764227442
- License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
- Abstract: Reinforcement learning with verifiable reward (RLVR) has become a promising paradigm for post-training large language models (LLMs) to improve their reasoning capability. However, when the rollout accuracy is low on hard problems, the reward becomes sparse, limiting learning efficiency and causing exploration bottlenecks. Existing approaches either rely on teacher models for distillation or filter out difficult problems, which limits scalability or restricts reasoning improvement through exploration. We propose EvoCoT, a self-evolving curriculum learning framework based on two-stage chain-of-thought (CoT) reasoning optimization. EvoCoT constrains the exploration space by self-generating and verifying CoT trajectories, then gradually shortens CoT steps to expand the space in a controlled way. The framework enables LLMs to stably learn from initially unsolved hard problems under sparse rewards. We apply EvoCoT to multiple LLM families, including Qwen, DeepSeek, and Llama. Experiments show that EvoCoT enables LLMs to solve previously unsolved problems, improves reasoning capability without external CoT supervision, and is compatible with various RL fine-tuning methods. We release the source code to support future research.
Related papers
- ThetaEvolve: Test-time Learning on Open Problems [110.5756538358217]
We introduce ThetaEvolve, an open-source framework that simplifies and extends AlphaEvolve to efficiently scale both in-context learning and Reinforcement Learning (RL) at test time.<n>We find that ThetaEvolve with RL at test-time consistently outperforms inference-only baselines.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-11-28T18:58:14Z) - Staying in the Sweet Spot: Responsive Reasoning Evolution via Capability-Adaptive Hint Scaffolding [59.60915947702282]
Reinforcement learning with verifiable rewards (RLVR) has achieved remarkable success in enhancing the reasoning capabilities of large language models (LLMs)<n>Existing RLVR methods often suffer from exploration inefficiency due to mismatches between the training data's difficulty and the model's capability.<n>We propose SEELE, a novel supervision-aided RLVR framework that dynamically adjusts problem difficulty to stay within the high-efficiency region.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-09-08T17:36:21Z) - Consistent Paths Lead to Truth: Self-Rewarding Reinforcement Learning for LLM Reasoning [87.7836502955847]
We propose a novel self-rewarding reinforcement learning framework to enhance Large Language Model (LLM) reasoning.<n>Our key insight is that correct responses often exhibit consistent trajectory patterns in terms of model likelihood.<n>We introduce CoVo, an intrinsic reward mechanism that integrates Consistency and Volatility via a robust vector-space aggregation strategy.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-06-10T12:40:39Z) - Curriculum Reinforcement Learning from Easy to Hard Tasks Improves LLM Reasoning [58.62311540316617]
We aim to improve the reasoning capabilities of language models via reinforcement learning (RL)<n>We propose to schedule tasks from easy to hard (E2H), allowing LLMs to build reasoning skills gradually.<n>E2H Reasoner significantly improves the reasoning ability of small LLMs (1.5B to 3B)
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-06-07T02:41:54Z) - TACO: Think-Answer Consistency for Optimized Long-Chain Reasoning and Efficient Data Learning via Reinforcement Learning in LVLMs [50.820065021136024]
DeepSeek R1 has significantly advanced complex reasoning for large language models (LLMs)<n>Recent methods have attempted to replicate R1's reasoning capabilities in multimodal settings.<n>We propose TACO, a novel reinforcement learning algorithm for visual reasoning.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-05-27T06:30:48Z) - Enhancing Efficiency and Exploration in Reinforcement Learning for LLMs [12.087316618902433]
Reasoning large language models (LLMs) excel in complex tasks.<n>Existing approaches allocate an equal number of rollouts to all questions during reinforcement learning (RL)<n>We propose a mechanism for dynamically allocating rollout budgets based on the difficulty of the problems.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-05-24T07:28:29Z) - R1-Searcher: Incentivizing the Search Capability in LLMs via Reinforcement Learning [87.30285670315334]
textbfR1-Searcher is a novel two-stage outcome-based RL approach designed to enhance the search capabilities of Large Language Models.<n>Our framework relies exclusively on RL, without requiring process rewards or distillation for a cold start.<n>Our experiments demonstrate that our method significantly outperforms previous strong RAG methods, even when compared to the closed-source GPT-4o-mini.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-03-07T17:14:44Z) - SoftCoT: Soft Chain-of-Thought for Efficient Reasoning with LLMs [48.28847964704554]
Chain-of-Thought (CoT) reasoning enables Large Language Models (LLMs) to solve complex reasoning tasks.<n>We propose a novel approach for continuous-space reasoning that does not require modifying the LLM.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-02-17T18:52:29Z) - On the Emergence of Thinking in LLMs I: Searching for the Right Intuition [34.32871896067864]
We propose a post-training framework called Reinforcement Learning via Self-Play (RLSP)<n> RLSP involves three steps: supervised fine-tuning with human or synthetic demonstrations of the reasoning process, using an exploration reward signal to encourage diverse and efficient reasoning behaviors, and RL training with an outcome verifier to ensure correctness while preventing reward hacking.<n> Empirical studies in the math domain show that RLSP improves reasoning.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-02-10T18:52:04Z) - Language Models are Hidden Reasoners: Unlocking Latent Reasoning Capabilities via Self-Rewarding [74.31981011985681]
Large language models (LLMs) have shown impressive capabilities, but still struggle with complex reasoning tasks requiring multiple steps.
We introduce LaTent Reasoning Optimization (LaTRO), a principled framework that formulates reasoning as sampling from a latent distribution.
We validate LaTRO through experiments on GSM8K and ARC-Challenge datasets using multiple model architectures.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-11-06T22:02:30Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.