$100,000 or the Robot Gets it! Tech Workers' Resistance Guide: Tech Worker Actions, History, Risks, Impacts, and the Case for a Radical Flank

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2508.08084v1
• Date: Mon, 11 Aug 2025 15:29:34 GMT
• Title: $100,000 or the Robot Gets it! Tech Workers' Resistance Guide: Tech Worker Actions, History, Risks, Impacts, and the Case for a Radical Flank
• Authors: Mohamed Abdalla,
• Abstract summary: Big Tech has faced increasing levels of worker activism over the past decade.<n>While worker actions have resulted in positive outcomes, such successes have become increasingly infrequent.<n>This is in part because corporations have adjusted their strategies to dealing with increased worker activism.
• Score: 2.100497888256766
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
• Abstract: Over the past decade, Big Tech has faced increasing levels of worker activism. While worker actions have resulted in positive outcomes (e.g., cancellation of Google's Project Dragonfly), such successes have become increasingly infrequent. This is, in part, because corporations have adjusted their strategies to dealing with increased worker activism (e.g., increased retaliation against workers, and contracts clauses that prevent cancellation due to worker pressure). This change in company strategy prompts urgent questions about updating worker strategies for influencing corporate behavior in an industry with vast societal impact. Current discourse on tech worker activism often lacks empirical grounding regarding its scope, history, and strategic calculus. Our work seeks to bridge this gap by firstly conducting a systematic analysis of worker actions at Google and Microsoft reported in U.S. newspapers to delineate their characteristics. We then situate these actions within the long history of labour movements and demonstrate that, despite perceptions of radicalism, contemporary tech activism is comparatively moderate. Finally, we engage directly with current and former tech activists to provide a novel catalogue of potential worker actions, evaluating their perceived risks, impacts, and effectiveness (concurrently publishing "Tech Workers' Guide to Resistance"). Our findings highlight considerable variation in strategic thinking among activists themselves. We conclude by arguing that the establishment of a radical flank could increase the effectiveness of current movements. "Tech Workers' Guide to Resistance" can be found at https://www.cs.toronto.edu/~msa/TechWorkersResistanceGuide.pdf or https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.16779082

Related papers

• Can Online GenAI Discussion Serve as Bellwether for Labor Market Shifts? [62.386835769570006]
  This paper examines whether online discussions about Large Language Models can function as early indicators of labor market shifts.<n>We employ four distinct analytical approaches to identify the domains and timeframes in which public discourse serves as a leading signal for employment changes.<n>Our findings reveal that discussion intensity predicts employment changes 1-7 months in advance across multiple indicators, including job postings, net hiring rates, tenure patterns, and unemployment duration.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-11-20T04:18:25Z)
• Now, Later, and Lasting: Ten Priorities for AI Research, Policy, and Practice [63.20307830884542]
  Next several decades may well be a turning point for humanity, comparable to the industrial revolution. Launched a decade ago, the project is committed to a perpetual series of studies by multidisciplinary experts. We offer ten recommendations for action that collectively address both the short- and long-term potential impacts of AI technologies.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-06T22:18:31Z)
• Towards more Practical Threat Models in Artificial Intelligence Security [66.67624011455423]
  Recent works have identified a gap between research and practice in artificial intelligence security. We revisit the threat models of the six most studied attacks in AI security research and match them to AI usage in practice.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-16T16:09:44Z)
• Decoding the Silent Majority: Inducing Belief Augmented Social Graph with Large Language Model for Response Forecasting [74.68371461260946]
  SocialSense is a framework that induces a belief-centered graph on top of an existent social network, along with graph-based propagation to capture social dynamics. Our method surpasses existing state-of-the-art in experimental evaluations for both zero-shot and supervised settings.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-20T06:17:02Z)
• Identifying and Mitigating the Security Risks of Generative AI [179.2384121957896]
  This paper reports the findings of a workshop held at Google on the dual-use dilemma posed by GenAI. GenAI can be used just as well by attackers to generate new attacks and increase the velocity and efficacy of existing attacks. We discuss short-term and long-term goals for the community on this topic.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-08-28T18:51:09Z)
• Unlikely Organizers: The Rise of Labor Activism Among Professionals in the U.S. Technology Industry [0.0]
  Since 2017, we have seen a significant rise in labor actions among tech workers. We show periods of intense workplace social activism preceded later periods of heightened labor activism. This finding extends Fantasia's cultures of solidarity argument to professional workers.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-07-28T20:04:17Z)
• Work-From-Home is Here to Stay: Call for Flexibility in Post-Pandemic Work Policies [4.409836695738518]
  Covid-19 pandemic forced employees in tech companies worldwide to abruptly transition from working in offices to working from their homes. Many companies are currently experimenting with new work policies that balance employee- and manager expectations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-03-21T17:11:20Z)
• Initiative Defense against Facial Manipulation [82.96864888025797]
  We propose a novel framework of initiative defense to degrade the performance of facial manipulation models controlled by malicious users. We first imitate the target manipulation model with a surrogate model, and then devise a poison perturbation generator to obtain the desired venom.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-12-19T09:42:28Z)
• It's Time to Do Something: Mitigating the Negative Impacts of Computing Through a Change to the Peer Review Process [39.25245714097946]
  We believe we can achieve substantial progress with a straightforward step: making a small change to the peer review process. As we explain below, we hypothesize that our recommended change will force computing researchers to more deeply consider the negative impacts of their work. We also expect that this change will incentivize research and policy that alleviates computing's negative impacts.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-12-17T14:51:57Z)
• What motivates people to telework? Exploratory study in a post-confinement context [0.0]
  The study focuses on the following questions: what is the new interest to telework for employees and what are the potential reasons for this? The results show that adoption of telework is real for the respondents. Those who have experienced it present a strong motivation and a real capacity to use it, with almost no technological barriers. The study points out that adoption of telework could be sustainable for both public and private organizations, and this requires a critical examination and discussion.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-10-07T12:40:40Z)
• Skill-driven Recommendations for Job Transition Pathways [8.175175834134706]
  Job security can never be taken for granted, especially in times of rapid, widespread and unexpected social and economic change. We propose a novel method to measure the similarity between occupations using their underlying skills. We then build a recommender system for identifying optimal transition pathways between occupations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-11-23T23:58:26Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.