DocThinker: Explainable Multimodal Large Language Models with Rule-based Reinforcement Learning for Document Understanding

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2508.08589v1
• Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2025 03:06:55 GMT
• Title: DocThinker: Explainable Multimodal Large Language Models with Rule-based Reinforcement Learning for Document Understanding
• Authors: Wenwen Yu, Zhibo Yang, Yuliang Liu, Xiang Bai,
• Abstract summary: We propose DocThinker, a rule-based Reinforcement Learning framework for dynamic inference-time reasoning.<n>Our method mitigates catastrophic forgetting and enhances both adaptability and transparency.<n>Our findings highlight RL as a powerful alternative for enhancing explainability and adaptability in MLLM-based document understanding.
• Score: 66.07724324530844
• License: http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/
• Abstract: Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) have demonstrated remarkable capabilities in document understanding. However, their reasoning processes remain largely black-box, making it difficult to ensure reliability and trustworthiness, especially in high-stakes domains such as legal, financial, and medical document analysis. Existing methods use fixed Chain-of-Thought (CoT) reasoning with supervised fine-tuning (SFT) but suffer from catastrophic forgetting, poor adaptability, and limited generalization across domain tasks. In this paper, we propose DocThinker, a rule-based Reinforcement Learning (RL) framework for dynamic inference-time reasoning. Instead of relying on static CoT templates, DocThinker autonomously refines reasoning strategies via policy learning, generating explainable intermediate results, including structured reasoning processes, rephrased questions, regions of interest (RoI) supporting the answer, and the final answer. By integrating multi-objective rule-based rewards and KL-constrained optimization, our method mitigates catastrophic forgetting and enhances both adaptability and transparency. Extensive experiments on multiple benchmarks demonstrate that DocThinker significantly improves generalization while producing more explainable and human-understandable reasoning steps. Our findings highlight RL as a powerful alternative for enhancing explainability and adaptability in MLLM-based document understanding. Code will be available at https://github.com/wenwenyu/DocThinker.

Related papers

• CogDoc: Towards Unified thinking in Documents [53.41571589733423]
  We propose a unified coarse-to-fine thinking framework that mimics human cognitive processes: a low-resolution "Fast Reading" phase for scalable information localization, followed by a high-resolution "Focused Thinking" phase for deep reasoning.<n>We conduct a rigorous investigation into post-training strategies for the unified thinking framework, demonstrating that a Direct Reinforcement Learning approach outperforms RL with Supervised Fine-Tuning (SFT)<n>Specifically, we find that direct RL avoids the "policy conflict" observed in SFT.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-12-14T12:14:17Z)
• Multi-Path Collaborative Reasoning via Reinforcement Learning [54.8518809800168]
  Chain-of-Thought (CoT) reasoning has significantly advanced the problem-solving capabilities of Large Language Models (LLMs)<n>Recent methods attempt to address this by generating soft abstract tokens to enable reasoning in a continuous semantic space.<n>We propose Multi-Path Perception Policy Optimization (M3PO), a novel reinforcement learning framework that explicitly injects collective insights into the reasoning process.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-12-01T10:05:46Z)
• Benchmarking Multi-Step Legal Reasoning and Analyzing Chain-of-Thought Effects in Large Language Models [8.769542756426786]
  We introduce M SLR, the first Chinese multi-step legal reasoning dataset grounded in real-world judicial decision making.<n>M SLR adopts the IRAC framework (Issue, Rule, Application, Conclusion) to model structured expert reasoning from official legal documents.<n>We design a scalable Human-LLM collaborative annotation pipeline that efficiently produces fine-grained step-level reasoning annotations.<n>Further experiments demonstrate that Self-Initiated Chain-of-Thought prompts generated by models autonomously improve reasoning coherence and quality, outperforming human-designed prompts.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-11-11T08:45:29Z)
• Implicit Reasoning in Large Language Models: A Comprehensive Survey [67.53966514728383]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) have demonstrated strong generalization across a wide range of tasks.<n>Recent studies have shifted attention from explicit chain-of-thought prompting toward implicit reasoning.<n>This survey introduces a taxonomy centered on execution paradigms, shifting the focus from representational forms to computational strategies.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-09-02T14:16:02Z)
• Hierarchical Vision-Language Reasoning for Multimodal Multiple-Choice Question Answering [13.298532858905782]
  Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) have demonstrated remarkable multimodal understanding capabilities in Visual Question Answering (VQA) tasks.<n>Current mainstream models suffer from a strong bias toward English training data, resulting in suboptimal performance for Japanese and other language scenarios.<n>This paper proposes a novel Japanese PDF document understanding framework that combines multimodal hierarchical reasoning mechanisms with Colqwen-optimized retrieval methods.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-08-22T07:17:16Z)
• PixelThink: Towards Efficient Chain-of-Pixel Reasoning [70.32510083790069]
  PixelThink is a simple yet effective scheme that integrates externally estimated task difficulty and internally measured model uncertainty.<n>It learns to compress reasoning length in accordance with scene complexity and predictive confidence.<n> Experimental results demonstrate that the proposed approach improves both reasoning efficiency and overall segmentation performance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-29T17:55:49Z)
• Layered Chain-of-Thought Prompting for Multi-Agent LLM Systems: A Comprehensive Approach to Explainable Large Language Models [0.0]
  We propose Layered Chain-of-Thought (Layered-CoT) Prompting, a novel framework that systematically segments the reasoning process into multiple layers.<n>We present three scenarios -- medical triage, financial risk assessment, and agile engineering -- and demonstrate how Layered-CoT surpasses vanilla CoT in terms of transparency, correctness, and user engagement.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-01-29T13:21:09Z)
• Unleashing Multi-Hop Reasoning Potential in Large Language Models through Repetition of Misordered Context [31.091013417498825]
  We propose a simple yet effective method called context repetition (CoRe)<n>This ensures that certain contiguous reasoning segments within supporting documents are presented in the optimal order.<n>Applying CoRe, we improve the F1 score by up to 30%p on multi-hop QA tasks and increase accuracy by up to 70%p on a synthetic task.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-09T17:41:53Z)
• Proof of Thought : Neurosymbolic Program Synthesis allows Robust and Interpretable Reasoning [1.3003982724617653]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) have revolutionized natural language processing, yet they struggle with inconsistent reasoning. This research introduces Proof of Thought, a framework that enhances the reliability and transparency of LLM outputs. Key contributions include a robust type system with sort management for enhanced logical integrity, explicit representation of rules for clear distinction between factual and inferential knowledge.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-09-25T18:35:45Z)
• Can LLMs Reason with Rules? Logic Scaffolding for Stress-Testing and Improving LLMs [87.34281749422756]
  Large language models (LLMs) have achieved impressive human-like performance across various reasoning tasks. However, their mastery of underlying inferential rules still falls short of human capabilities. We propose a logic scaffolding inferential rule generation framework, to construct an inferential rule base, ULogic.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-18T03:38:51Z)
• From Understanding to Utilization: A Survey on Explainability for Large Language Models [27.295767173801426]
  This survey underscores the imperative for increased explainability in Large Language Models (LLMs) Our focus is primarily on pre-trained Transformer-based LLMs, which pose distinctive interpretability challenges due to their scale and complexity. When considering the utilization of explainability, we explore several compelling methods that concentrate on model editing, control generation, and model enhancement.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-01-23T16:09:53Z)
• A Principled Framework for Knowledge-enhanced Large Language Model [58.1536118111993]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) are versatile, yet they often falter in tasks requiring deep and reliable reasoning. This paper introduces a rigorously designed framework for creating LLMs that effectively anchor knowledge and employ a closed-loop reasoning process.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-18T18:10:02Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.