XFacta: Contemporary, Real-World Dataset and Evaluation for Multimodal Misinformation Detection with Multimodal LLMs

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2508.09999v1
• Date: Mon, 04 Aug 2025 14:14:52 GMT
• Title: XFacta: Contemporary, Real-World Dataset and Evaluation for Multimodal Misinformation Detection with Multimodal LLMs
• Authors: Yuzhuo Xiao, Zeyu Han, Yuhan Wang, Huaizu Jiang,
• Abstract summary: multimodal large language models (MLLMs) have shown potential in addressing this challenge.<n>Existing benchmarks either contain outdated events, leading to evaluation bias.<n>We introduce XFacta, a contemporary, real-world dataset that is better suited for evaluating MLLM-based detectors.
• Score: 7.535905996650162
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: The rapid spread of multimodal misinformation on social media calls for more effective and robust detection methods. Recent advances leveraging multimodal large language models (MLLMs) have shown the potential in addressing this challenge. However, it remains unclear exactly where the bottleneck of existing approaches lies (evidence retrieval v.s. reasoning), hindering the further advances in this field. On the dataset side, existing benchmarks either contain outdated events, leading to evaluation bias due to discrepancies with contemporary social media scenarios as MLLMs can simply memorize these events, or artificially synthetic, failing to reflect real-world misinformation patterns. Additionally, it lacks comprehensive analyses of MLLM-based model design strategies. To address these issues, we introduce XFacta, a contemporary, real-world dataset that is better suited for evaluating MLLM-based detectors. We systematically evaluate various MLLM-based misinformation detection strategies, assessing models across different architectures and scales, as well as benchmarking against existing detection methods. Building on these analyses, we further enable a semi-automatic detection-in-the-loop framework that continuously updates XFacta with new content to maintain its contemporary relevance. Our analysis provides valuable insights and practices for advancing the field of multimodal misinformation detection. The code and data have been released.

Related papers

• PENDULUM: A Benchmark for Assessing Sycophancy in Multimodal Large Language Models [43.767942065379366]
  Sycophancy is a tendency of AI models to agree with user input at the expense of factual accuracy or in contradiction of visual evidence.<n>We introduce a comprehensive evaluation benchmark, textitPENDULUM, comprising approximately 2,000 human-curated Visual Question Answering pairs.<n>We observe substantial variability in model robustness and a pronounced susceptibility to sycophantic and hallucinatory behavior.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-12-22T12:49:12Z)
• Contamination Detection for VLMs using Multi-Modal Semantic Perturbation [73.76465227729818]
  Open-source Vision-Language Models (VLMs) have achieved state-of-the-art performance on benchmark tasks.<n>Pretraining corpora raise a critical concern for both practitioners and users: inflated performance due to test-set leakage.<n>We show that existing detection approaches either fail outright or exhibit inconsistent behavior.<n>We propose a novel simple yet effective detection method based on multi-modal semantic perturbation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-11-05T18:59:52Z)
• Quantization Meets dLLMs: A Systematic Study of Post-training Quantization for Diffusion LLMs [78.09559830840595]
  We present the first systematic study on quantizing diffusion-based language models.<n>We identify the presence of activation outliers, characterized by abnormally large activation values.<n>We implement state-of-the-art PTQ methods and conduct a comprehensive evaluation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-08-20T17:59:51Z)
• LLMs in Software Security: A Survey of Vulnerability Detection Techniques and Insights [12.424610893030353]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) are emerging as transformative tools for software vulnerability detection.<n>This paper provides a detailed survey of LLMs in vulnerability detection.<n>We address challenges such as cross-language vulnerability detection, multimodal data integration, and repository-level analysis.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-10T21:33:38Z)
• Survey on AI-Generated Media Detection: From Non-MLLM to MLLM [51.91311158085973]
  Methods for detecting AI-generated media have evolved rapidly.<n>General-purpose detectors based on MLLMs integrate authenticity verification, explainability, and localization capabilities.<n>Ethical and security considerations have emerged as critical global concerns.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-07T12:18:20Z)
• Detecting LLM Hallucination Through Layer-wise Information Deficiency: Analysis of Ambiguous Prompts and Unanswerable Questions [60.31496362993982]
  Large language models (LLMs) frequently generate confident yet inaccurate responses.<n>We present a novel, test-time approach to detecting model hallucination through systematic analysis of information flow.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-12-13T16:14:49Z)
• Both Text and Images Leaked! A Systematic Analysis of Data Contamination in Multimodal LLM [53.05486269607166]
  multimodal large language models (MLLMs) have significantly enhanced performance across benchmarks.<n>Existing detection methods for unimodal large language models (LLMs) are inadequate for MLLMs due to multimodal data complexity and multi-phase training.<n>We analyze multimodal data contamination using our analytical framework, MM-Detect, which defines two contamination categories-unimodal and cross-modal.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-06T10:44:15Z)
• Beyond Binary: Towards Fine-Grained LLM-Generated Text Detection via Role Recognition and Involvement Measurement [51.601916604301685]
  Large language models (LLMs) generate content that can undermine trust in online discourse.<n>Current methods often focus on binary classification, failing to address the complexities of real-world scenarios like human-LLM collaboration.<n>To move beyond binary classification and address these challenges, we propose a new paradigm for detecting LLM-generated content.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-18T08:14:10Z)
• MMIE: Massive Multimodal Interleaved Comprehension Benchmark for Large Vision-Language Models [71.36392373876505]
  We introduce MMIE, a large-scale benchmark for evaluating interleaved multimodal comprehension and generation in Large Vision-Language Models (LVLMs)<n>MMIE comprises 20K meticulously curated multimodal queries, spanning 3 categories, 12 fields, and 102 subfields, including mathematics, coding, physics, literature, health, and arts.<n>It supports both interleaved inputs and outputs, offering a mix of multiple-choice and open-ended question formats to evaluate diverse competencies.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-14T04:15:00Z)
• Assessing Modality Bias in Video Question Answering Benchmarks with Multimodal Large Language Models [12.841405829775852]
  We introduce the modality importance score (MIS) to identify bias inVidQA benchmarks and datasets.<n>We also propose an innovative method using state-of-the-art MLLMs to estimate the modality importance.<n>Our results indicate that current models do not effectively integrate information due to modality imbalance in existing datasets.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-22T23:32:42Z)
• MM-SpuBench: Towards Better Understanding of Spurious Biases in Multimodal LLMs [38.93090238335506]
  Spurious bias, a tendency to use spurious correlations between non-essential input attributes and target variables for predictions, has revealed a severe pitfall in deep learning models trained on single modality data. We introduce MM-SpuBench, a comprehensive visual question-answering (VQA) benchmark designed to evaluate MLLMs' reliance on nine distinct categories of spurious correlations. Our findings illuminate the persistence of the reliance on spurious correlations from these models and underscore the urge for new methodologies to mitigate spurious biases.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-24T20:29:16Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.