Welfare-Centric Clustering

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2508.10345v1
• Date: Thu, 14 Aug 2025 05:02:32 GMT
• Title: Welfare-Centric Clustering
• Authors: Claire Jie Zhang, Seyed A. Esmaeili, Jamie Morgenstern,
• Abstract summary: We model group utilities based on both distances and proportional representation and formalize two optimization objectives based on welfare-centric clustering.<n> Empirical evaluations on multiple real-world datasets demonstrate that our methods significantly outperform existing fair clustering baselines.
• Score: 8.58246106464289
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Fair clustering has traditionally focused on ensuring equitable group representation or equalizing group-specific clustering costs. However, Dickerson et al. (2025) recently showed that these fairness notions may yield undesirable or unintuitive clustering outcomes and advocated for a welfare-centric clustering approach that models the utilities of the groups. In this work, we model group utilities based on both distances and proportional representation and formalize two optimization objectives based on welfare-centric clustering: the Rawlsian (Egalitarian) objective and the Utilitarian objective. We introduce novel algorithms for both objectives and prove theoretical guarantees for them. Empirical evaluations on multiple real-world datasets demonstrate that our methods significantly outperform existing fair clustering baselines.

Related papers

• Self-Supervised Graph Embedding Clustering [70.36328717683297]
  K-means one-step dimensionality reduction clustering method has made some progress in addressing the curse of dimensionality in clustering tasks. We propose a unified framework that integrates manifold learning with K-means, resulting in the self-supervised graph embedding framework.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-09-24T08:59:51Z)
• A structured regression approach for evaluating model performance across intersectional subgroups [53.91682617836498]
  Disaggregated evaluation is a central task in AI fairness assessment, where the goal is to measure an AI system's performance across different subgroups. We introduce a structured regression approach to disaggregated evaluation that we demonstrate can yield reliable system performance estimates even for very small subgroups.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-01-26T14:21:45Z)
• End-to-end Learnable Clustering for Intent Learning in Recommendation [54.157784572994316]
  We propose a novel intent learning method termed underlineELCRec. It unifies behavior representation learning into an underlineEnd-to-end underlineLearnable underlineClustering framework. We deploy this method on the industrial recommendation system with 130 million page views and achieve promising results.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-01-11T15:22:55Z)
• DualFair: Fair Representation Learning at Both Group and Individual Levels via Contrastive Self-supervision [73.80009454050858]
  This work presents a self-supervised model, called DualFair, that can debias sensitive attributes like gender and race from learned representations. Our model jointly optimize for two fairness criteria - group fairness and counterfactual fairness.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-03-15T07:13:54Z)
• Cluster-level Group Representativity Fairness in $k$-means Clustering [3.420467786581458]
  Clustering algorithms could generate clusters such that different groups are disadvantaged within different clusters. We develop a clustering algorithm, building upon the centroid clustering paradigm pioneered by classical algorithms. We show that our method is effective in enhancing cluster-level group representativity fairness significantly at low impact on cluster coherence.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-12-29T22:02:28Z)
• Improved Approximation for Fair Correlation Clustering [4.629694186457133]
  Correlation clustering is a ubiquitous paradigm in unsupervised machine learning where addressing unfairness is a major challenge. Motivated by this, we study Fair Correlation Clustering where the data points may belong to different protected groups. Our paper significantly generalizes and improves on the quality guarantees of previous work of Ahmadi et al. and Ahmadian et al.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-06-09T03:07:57Z)
• Fair Clustering Under a Bounded Cost [33.50262066253557]
  Clustering is a fundamental unsupervised learning problem where a dataset is partitioned into clusters that consist of nearby points in a metric space. A recent variant, fair clustering, associates a color with each point representing its group membership and requires that each color has (approximately) equal representation in each cluster to satisfy group fairness. We consider two fairness objectives: the group utilitarian objective and the group egalitarian objective, as well as the group leximin objective which generalizes the group egalitarian objective.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-06-14T08:47:36Z)
• You Never Cluster Alone [150.94921340034688]
  We extend the mainstream contrastive learning paradigm to a cluster-level scheme, where all the data subjected to the same cluster contribute to a unified representation. We define a set of categorical variables as clustering assignment confidence, which links the instance-level learning track with the cluster-level one. By reparametrizing the assignment variables, TCC is trained end-to-end, requiring no alternating steps.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-06-03T14:59:59Z)
• Deep Fair Discriminative Clustering [24.237000220172906]
  We study a general notion of group-level fairness for binary and multi-state protected status variables (PSVs) We propose a refinement learning algorithm to combine the clustering goal with the fairness objective to learn fair clusters adaptively. Our framework shows promising results for novel clustering tasks including flexible fairness constraints, multi-state PSVs and predictive clustering.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-05-28T23:50:48Z)
• Scalable Hierarchical Agglomerative Clustering [65.66407726145619]
  Existing scalable hierarchical clustering methods sacrifice quality for speed. We present a scalable, agglomerative method for hierarchical clustering that does not sacrifice quality and scales to billions of data points.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-10-22T15:58:35Z)
• Distributional Individual Fairness in Clustering [7.303841123034983]
  We introduce a framework for assigning individuals, embedded in a metric space, to probability distributions over a bounded number of cluster centers. We provide an algorithm for clustering with $p$-norm objective and individual fairness constraints with provable approximation guarantee.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-06-22T20:02:09Z)
• Fair Hierarchical Clustering [92.03780518164108]
  We define a notion of fairness that mitigates over-representation in traditional clustering. We show that our algorithms can find a fair hierarchical clustering, with only a negligible loss in the objective.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-06-18T01:05:11Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.