MedAtlas: Evaluating LLMs for Multi-Round, Multi-Task Medical Reasoning Across Diverse Imaging Modalities and Clinical Text

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2508.10947v1
• Date: Wed, 13 Aug 2025 17:32:17 GMT
• Title: MedAtlas: Evaluating LLMs for Multi-Round, Multi-Task Medical Reasoning Across Diverse Imaging Modalities and Clinical Text
• Authors: Ronghao Xu, Zhen Huang, Yangbo Wei, Xiaoqian Zhou, Zikang Xu, Ting Liu, Zihang Jiang, S. Kevin Zhou,
• Abstract summary: We introduce MedAtlas, a novel benchmark framework to evaluate large language models on realistic medical reasoning tasks.<n> MedAtlas is characterized by four key features: multi-turn dialogue, multi-modal medical image interaction, multi-task integration, and high clinical fidelity.<n>Each case is derived from real diagnostic and incorporates temporal interactions between textual medical histories and multiple imaging modalities, including CT, MRI, PET, ultrasound, and X-ray.
• Score: 25.102399692530245
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Artificial intelligence has demonstrated significant potential in clinical decision-making; however, developing models capable of adapting to diverse real-world scenarios and performing complex diagnostic reasoning remains a major challenge. Existing medical multi-modal benchmarks are typically limited to single-image, single-turn tasks, lacking multi-modal medical image integration and failing to capture the longitudinal and multi-modal interactive nature inherent to clinical practice. To address this gap, we introduce MedAtlas, a novel benchmark framework designed to evaluate large language models on realistic medical reasoning tasks. MedAtlas is characterized by four key features: multi-turn dialogue, multi-modal medical image interaction, multi-task integration, and high clinical fidelity. It supports four core tasks: open-ended multi-turn question answering, closed-ended multi-turn question answering, multi-image joint reasoning, and comprehensive disease diagnosis. Each case is derived from real diagnostic workflows and incorporates temporal interactions between textual medical histories and multiple imaging modalities, including CT, MRI, PET, ultrasound, and X-ray, requiring models to perform deep integrative reasoning across images and clinical texts. MedAtlas provides expert-annotated gold standards for all tasks. Furthermore, we propose two novel evaluation metrics: Round Chain Accuracy and Error Propagation Resistance. Benchmark results with existing multi-modal models reveal substantial performance gaps in multi-stage clinical reasoning. MedAtlas establishes a challenging evaluation platform to advance the development of robust and trustworthy medical AI.

Related papers

• MedGEN-Bench: Contextually entangled benchmark for open-ended multimodal medical generation [40.05080887875327]
  We introduce MedGEN-Bench, a comprehensive multimodal benchmark designed to advance medical AI research.<n>MedGEN-Bench comprises 6,422 expert-validated image-text pairs spanning six imaging modalities, 16 clinical tasks, and 28 subtasks.<n>We employ a novel three-tier assessment framework that integrates pixel-level metrics, semantic text analysis, and expert-guided clinical relevance scoring.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-11-17T08:41:56Z)
• TemMed-Bench: Evaluating Temporal Medical Image Reasoning in Vision-Language Models [54.48710348910535]
  Existing medical reasoning benchmarks primarily focus on analyzing a patient's condition based on an image from a single visit.<n>We introduce TemMed-Bench, the first benchmark designed for analyzing changes in patients' conditions between different clinical visits.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-09-29T17:51:26Z)
• RAD: Towards Trustworthy Retrieval-Augmented Multi-modal Clinical Diagnosis [56.373297358647655]
  Retrieval-Augmented Diagnosis (RAD) is a novel framework that injects external knowledge into multimodal models directly on downstream tasks.<n>RAD operates through three key mechanisms: retrieval and refinement of disease-centered knowledge from multiple medical sources, a guideline-enhanced contrastive loss transformer, and a dual decoder.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-09-24T10:36:14Z)
• A Survey of Multimodal Ophthalmic Diagnostics: From Task-Specific Approaches to Foundational Models [28.34025112894094]
  The review focuses on two main categories: task-specific multimodal approaches and large-scale multimodal foundation models.<n>The survey critically examines important datasets, evaluation metrics, and methodological innovations.<n>It also discusses ongoing challenges such as variability in data, limited annotations, lack of interpretability, and issues with generalizability across different patient populations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-07-31T10:49:21Z)
• MedSeg-R: Reasoning Segmentation in Medical Images with Multimodal Large Language Models [48.24824129683951]
  We introduce medical image reasoning segmentation, a novel task that aims to generate segmentation masks based on complex and implicit medical instructions.<n>To address this, we propose MedSeg-R, an end-to-end framework that leverages the reasoning abilities of MLLMs to interpret clinical questions.<n>It is built on two core components: 1) a global context understanding module that interprets images and comprehends complex medical instructions to generate multi-modal intermediate tokens, and 2) a pixel-level grounding module that decodes these tokens to produce precise segmentation masks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-12T08:13:38Z)
• Lingshu: A Generalist Foundation Model for Unified Multimodal Medical Understanding and Reasoning [57.873833577058]
  We build a multimodal dataset enriched with extensive medical knowledge.<n>We then introduce our medical-specialized MLLM: Lingshu.<n>Lingshu undergoes multi-stage training to embed medical expertise and enhance its task-solving capabilities.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-08T08:47:30Z)
• Advancing Conversational Diagnostic AI with Multimodal Reasoning [44.1996223689966]
  Articulate Medical Intelligence Explorer (AMIE)<n>System implements a state-aware dialogue framework, where conversation flow is dynamically controlled by intermediate model outputs.<n>We compared AMIE to primary care physicians (PCPs) in a randomized, blinded, OSCE-style study of chat-based consultations with patient actors.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-06T20:52:01Z)
• UMIT: Unifying Medical Imaging Tasks via Vision-Language Models [17.65946656129399]
  UMIT is a unified multi-modal, multi-task VLM designed specifically for medical imaging tasks.<n>It is able to solve various tasks, including visual question answering, disease detection, and medical report generation.<n>It supports both English and Chinese, expanding its applicability globally.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-20T06:43:36Z)
• A Survey of Medical Vision-and-Language Applications and Their Techniques [48.268198631277315]
  Medical vision-and-language models (MVLMs) have attracted substantial interest due to their capability to offer a natural language interface for interpreting complex medical data. Here, we provide a comprehensive overview of MVLMs and the various medical tasks to which they have been applied. We also examine the datasets used for these tasks and compare the performance of different models based on standardized evaluation metrics.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-19T03:27:05Z)
• Med-MoE: Mixture of Domain-Specific Experts for Lightweight Medical Vision-Language Models [17.643421997037514]
  We propose a novel framework that tackles both discriminative and generative multimodal medical tasks. The learning of Med-MoE consists of three steps: multimodal medical alignment, instruction tuning and routing, and domain-specific MoE tuning. Our model can achieve performance superior to or on par with state-of-the-art baselines.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-16T02:35:17Z)
• AI Hospital: Benchmarking Large Language Models in a Multi-agent Medical Interaction Simulator [69.51568871044454]
  We introduce textbfAI Hospital, a framework simulating dynamic medical interactions between emphDoctor as player and NPCs. This setup allows for realistic assessments of LLMs in clinical scenarios. We develop the Multi-View Medical Evaluation benchmark, utilizing high-quality Chinese medical records and NPCs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-15T06:46:48Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.