ORBIT: An Object Property Reasoning Benchmark for Visual Inference Tasks

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2508.10956v1
• Date: Thu, 14 Aug 2025 11:28:40 GMT
• Title: ORBIT: An Object Property Reasoning Benchmark for Visual Inference Tasks
• Authors: Abhishek Kolari, Mohammadhossein Khojasteh, Yifan Jiang, Floris den Hengst, Filip Ilievski,
• Abstract summary: We introduce a systematic evaluation framework with images of three representative types, three reasoning levels of increasing complexity, and four object property dimensions.<n>We instantiate this benchmark into ORBIT, a multi-level reasoning VQA benchmark for object properties comprising 360 images paired with a total of 1,080 count-based questions.<n>Experiments with 12 state-of-the-art VLMs in zero-shot settings reveal significant limitations compared to humans, with the best-performing model only reaching 40% accuracy.
• Score: 10.848408092385192
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: While vision-language models (VLMs) have made remarkable progress on many popular visual question answering (VQA) benchmarks, it remains unclear whether they abstract and reason over depicted objects. Inspired by human object categorisation, object property reasoning involves identifying and recognising low-level details and higher-level abstractions. While current VQA benchmarks consider a limited set of object property attributes like size, they typically blend perception and reasoning, and lack representativeness in terms of reasoning and image categories. To this end, we introduce a systematic evaluation framework with images of three representative types, three reasoning levels of increasing complexity, and four object property dimensions driven by prior work on commonsense reasoning. We develop a procedure to instantiate this benchmark into ORBIT, a multi-level reasoning VQA benchmark for object properties comprising 360 images paired with a total of 1,080 count-based questions. Experiments with 12 state-of-the-art VLMs in zero-shot settings reveal significant limitations compared to humans, with the best-performing model only reaching 40\% accuracy. VLMs struggle particularly with realistic (photographic) images, counterfactual reasoning about physical and functional properties, and higher counts. ORBIT points to the need to develop methods for scalable benchmarking, generalize annotation guidelines, and explore additional reasoning VLMs. We make the ORBIT benchmark and the experimental code available to support such endeavors.

Related papers

• VisRes Bench: On Evaluating the Visual Reasoning Capabilities of VLMs [7.406217790017003]
  We introduce VisRes Bench, a benchmark to study visual reasoning in naturalistic settings without contextual language supervision.<n>Analyzing model behavior across three levels of complexity, we uncover clear limitations in perceptual and relational visual reasoning capacities.<n>We conclude by discussing how VisRes provides a unified framework for advancing abstract visual reasoning in multimodal research.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-12-24T14:18:38Z)
• Oedipus and the Sphinx: Benchmarking and Improving Visual Language Models for Complex Graphic Reasoning [14.984593408786045]
  We propose ReasonBench to evaluate the performance of visual language models (VLMs) in graphic reasoning tasks.<n>ReasonBench includes 1,613 questions from real-world intelligence tests.<n>We benchmark 11 mainstream VLMs and reveal significant limitations of current models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-08-01T05:12:38Z)
• Traceable Evidence Enhanced Visual Grounded Reasoning: Evaluation and Methodology [87.65242416688146]
  TreeBench is a diagnostic benchmark for visual grounded reasoning.<n>TreeVGR is a training paradigm to supervise localization and reasoning jointly with reinforcement learning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-07-10T17:59:58Z)
• Can MLLMs Guide Me Home? A Benchmark Study on Fine-Grained Visual Reasoning from Transit Maps [56.76175383189738]
  We introduce ReasonMap, a benchmark designed to assess the fine-grained visual understanding and spatial reasoning abilities of MLLMs.<n>ReasonMap encompasses high-resolution transit maps from 30 cities across 13 countries and includes 1,008 question-answer pairs spanning two question types and three templates.<n> Comprehensive evaluations of 15 popular MLLMs, including both base and reasoning variants, reveal a counterintuitive pattern.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-24T12:33:52Z)
• VisuLogic: A Benchmark for Evaluating Visual Reasoning in Multi-modal Large Language Models [121.03333569013148]
  We introduce VisuLogic: a benchmark of 1,000 human-verified problems across six categories.<n>These types of questions can be evaluated to assess the visual reasoning capabilities of MLLMs from multiple perspectives.<n>Most models score below 30% accuracy-only slightly above the 25% random baseline and far below the 51.4% achieved by humans.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-21T17:59:53Z)
• VOILA: Evaluation of MLLMs For Perceptual Understanding and Analogical Reasoning [63.0285363282581]
  Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) have become a powerful tool for integrating visual and textual information.<n>We introduce VOILA, a benchmark designed to evaluate MLLMs' perceptual understanding and abstract relational reasoning.<n>We reveal that current MLLMs struggle to comprehend inter-image relationships and exhibit limited capabilities in high-level relational reasoning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-25T23:36:19Z)
• Reasoning Paths with Reference Objects Elicit Quantitative Spatial Reasoning in Large Vision-Language Models [61.899791071654654]
  We introduce a benchmark, Q-Spatial Bench, with 271 questions across five categories designed for quantitative spatial reasoning. We investigate the performance of state-of-the-art vision-language models (VLMs) on this task. We develop a zero-shot prompting technique, SpatialPrompt, that encourages VLMs to answer quantitative spatial questions using reference objects as visual cues.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-09-15T16:45:42Z)
• MARVEL: Multidimensional Abstraction and Reasoning through Visual Evaluation and Learning [22.440669015518015]
  We evaluate whether multi-modal large language models (MLLMs) possess abstract visual reasoning abilities. Similar to the Sudoku puzzles, abstract visual reasoning (AVR) problems require finding high-level patterns. We introduce MARVEL, a benchmark with 770 MLLMs composed of six core knowledge patterns, geometric and abstract shapes, and five different task configurations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-21T09:15:02Z)
• Prismatic VLMs: Investigating the Design Space of Visually-Conditioned Language Models [73.40350756742231]
  Visually-conditioned language models (VLMs) have seen growing adoption in applications such as visual dialogue, scene understanding, and robotic task planning. Despite the volume of new releases, key design decisions around image preprocessing, architecture, and optimization are under-explored.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-12T18:21:14Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.