TriQDef: Disrupting Semantic and Gradient Alignment to Prevent Adversarial Patch Transferability in Quantized Neural Networks
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2508.12132v1
- Date: Sat, 16 Aug 2025 18:51:48 GMT
- Title: TriQDef: Disrupting Semantic and Gradient Alignment to Prevent Adversarial Patch Transferability in Quantized Neural Networks
- Abstract summary: Quantized Neural Networks (QNNs) are increasingly deployed in edge and resource-constrained environments.<n>TriQDef is a tri-level quantization-aware defense framework designed to disrupt the transferability of patch-based adversarial attacks across QNNs.
- Score: 3.962831477787584
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
- Abstract: Quantized Neural Networks (QNNs) are increasingly deployed in edge and resource-constrained environments due to their efficiency in computation and memory usage. While shown to distort the gradient landscape and weaken conventional pixel-level attacks, it provides limited robustness against patch-based adversarial attacks-localized, high-saliency perturbations that remain surprisingly transferable across bit-widths. Existing defenses either overfit to fixed quantization settings or fail to address this cross-bit generalization vulnerability. We introduce \textbf{TriQDef}, a tri-level quantization-aware defense framework designed to disrupt the transferability of patch-based adversarial attacks across QNNs. TriQDef consists of: (1) a Feature Disalignment Penalty (FDP) that enforces semantic inconsistency by penalizing perceptual similarity in intermediate representations; (2) a Gradient Perceptual Dissonance Penalty (GPDP) that explicitly misaligns input gradients across bit-widths by minimizing structural and directional agreement via Edge IoU and HOG Cosine metrics; and (3) a Joint Quantization-Aware Training Protocol that unifies these penalties within a shared-weight training scheme across multiple quantization levels. Extensive experiments on CIFAR-10 and ImageNet demonstrate that TriQDef reduces Attack Success Rates (ASR) by over 40\% on unseen patch and quantization combinations, while preserving high clean accuracy. Our findings underscore the importance of disrupting both semantic and perceptual gradient alignment to mitigate patch transferability in QNNs.
Related papers
- Generalizing GNNs with Tokenized Mixture of Experts [75.8310720413187]
We show that improving stability requires reducing reliance on shift-sensitive features, leaving an irreducible worst-case generalization floor.<n>We propose STEM-GNN, a pretrain-then-finetune framework with a mixture-of-experts encoder for diverse computation paths.<n>Across nine node, link, and graph benchmarks, STEM-GNN achieves a stronger three-way balance, improving robustness to degree/homophily shifts and to feature/edge corruptions while remaining competitive on clean graphs.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-02-09T22:48:30Z) - Rethinking Transferable Adversarial Attacks on Point Clouds from a Compact Subspace Perspective [55.919842734983156]
CoSA is a transferable attack framework that operates within a shared low-dimensional semantic space.<n>CoSA consistently outperforms state-of-the-art transferable attacks.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-01-30T15:48:11Z) - A Versatile Framework for Designing Group-Sparse Adversarial Attacks [8.931986088502091]
Existing adversarial attacks often neglect perturbation sparsity, limiting their ability to model structural changes.<n>We propose ATOS, a differentiable optimization framework that generates structured, sparse adversarial perturbations in element-wise, pixel-wise, and group-wise forms.<n>On CIFAR-10 and ImageNet, ATOS achieves a 100% attack success rate while producing significantly sparser and more structurally coherent perturbations than prior methods.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-10-18T20:42:45Z) - Overlap-Aware Feature Learning for Robust Unsupervised Domain Adaptation for 3D Semantic Segmentation [9.578322021478426]
3D point cloud semantic segmentation (PCSS) is a cornerstone for environmental perception in robotic systems and autonomous driving.<n>Existing methods critically overlook the inherent vulnerability to real-world perturbations (e.g., snow, fog, rain) and adversarial distortions.<n>This work first identifies two intrinsic limitations that undermine current PCSS-UDA robustness.<n>We propose a tripartite framework consisting of: 1) a robustness evaluation model quantifying resilience against adversarial attack/corruption types through robustness metrics; 2) an invertible attention alignment module (IAAM) enabling bidirectional domain mapping while preserving discriminative structure via attention-guided overlap suppression; and
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-04-02T12:16:23Z) - Breaking the Limits of Quantization-Aware Defenses: QADT-R for Robustness Against Patch-Based Adversarial Attacks in QNNs [3.962831477787584]
Quantized Neural Networks (QNNs) have emerged as a promising solution for reducing model size and computational costs.<n>In this work, we demonstrate that adversarial patches remain highly transferable across quantized models.<n>We propose Quantization-Aware Defense Training with Randomization (QADT-R) to enhance resilience against highly transferable patch-based attacks.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-03-10T08:43:36Z) - A Signed Graph Approach to Understanding and Mitigating Oversmoothing in GNNs [54.62268052283014]
We present a unified theoretical perspective based on the framework of signed graphs.<n>We show that many existing strategies implicitly introduce negative edges that alter message-passing to resist oversmoothing.<n>We propose Structural Balanced Propagation (SBP), a plug-and-play method that assigns signed edges based on either labels or feature similarity.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-02-17T03:25:36Z) - David and Goliath: An Empirical Evaluation of Attacks and Defenses for QNNs at the Deep Edge [0.9606184401853288]
Quantization is a well-established technique that has proved effective in enabling the deployment of neural networks on MCUs.
We empirically evaluate the effectiveness of attacks and defenses from (full-precision) ANNs onconstrained QNNs.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-04-08T17:14:32Z) - Discriminator-Free Generative Adversarial Attack [87.71852388383242]
Agenerative-based adversarial attacks can get rid of this limitation.
ASymmetric Saliency-based Auto-Encoder (SSAE) generates the perturbations.
The adversarial examples generated by SSAE not only make thewidely-used models collapse, but also achieves good visual quality.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-07-20T01:55:21Z) - Sparse and Imperceptible Adversarial Attack via a Homotopy Algorithm [93.80082636284922]
Sparse adversarial attacks can fool deep networks (DNNs) by only perturbing a few pixels.
Recent efforts combine it with another l_infty perturbation on magnitudes.
We propose a homotopy algorithm to tackle the sparsity and neural perturbation framework.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-06-10T20:11:36Z) - Patch-wise++ Perturbation for Adversarial Targeted Attacks [132.58673733817838]
We propose a patch-wise iterative method (PIM) aimed at crafting adversarial examples with high transferability.
Specifically, we introduce an amplification factor to the step size in each iteration, and one pixel's overall gradient overflowing the $epsilon$-constraint is properly assigned to its surrounding regions.
Compared with the current state-of-the-art attack methods, we significantly improve the success rate by 35.9% for defense models and 32.7% for normally trained models.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-12-31T08:40:42Z) - A Self-supervised Approach for Adversarial Robustness [105.88250594033053]
Adversarial examples can cause catastrophic mistakes in Deep Neural Network (DNNs) based vision systems.
This paper proposes a self-supervised adversarial training mechanism in the input space.
It provides significant robustness against the textbfunseen adversarial attacks.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-06-08T20:42:39Z) - Scaling Equilibrium Propagation to Deep ConvNets by Drastically Reducing
its Gradient Estimator Bias [65.13042449121411]
In practice, training a network with the gradient estimates provided by EP does not scale to visual tasks harder than MNIST.
We show that a bias in the gradient estimate of EP, inherent in the use of finite nudging, is responsible for this phenomenon.
We apply these techniques to train an architecture with asymmetric forward and backward connections, yielding a 13.2% test error.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-06-06T09:36:07Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.