The AI-Fraud Diamond: A Novel Lens for Auditing Algorithmic Deception

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2508.13984v1
• Date: Tue, 19 Aug 2025 16:21:44 GMT
• Title: The AI-Fraud Diamond: A Novel Lens for Auditing Algorithmic Deception
• Authors: Benjamin Zweers, Diptish Dey, Debarati Bhaumik,
• Abstract summary: This paper introduces the AI-Fraud Diamond, an extension of the traditional Fraud Triangle that adds technical opacity as a fourth condition alongside pressure, opportunity, and rationalization.<n>Unlike traditional fraud, AI-enabled deception may not involve clear human intent but can arise from system-level features such as opaque model behavior, flawed training data, or unregulated deployment practices.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: As artificial intelligence (AI) systems become increasingly integral to organizational processes, they introduce new forms of fraud that are often subtle, systemic, and concealed within technical complexity. This paper introduces the AI-Fraud Diamond, an extension of the traditional Fraud Triangle that adds technical opacity as a fourth condition alongside pressure, opportunity, and rationalization. Unlike traditional fraud, AI-enabled deception may not involve clear human intent but can arise from system-level features such as opaque model behavior, flawed training data, or unregulated deployment practices. The paper develops a taxonomy of AI-fraud across five categories: input data manipulation, model exploitation, algorithmic decision manipulation, synthetic misinformation, and ethics-based fraud. To assess the relevance and applicability of the AI-Fraud Diamond, the study draws on expert interviews with auditors from two of the Big Four consulting firms. The findings underscore the challenges auditors face when addressing fraud in opaque and automated environments, including limited technical expertise, insufficient cross-disciplinary collaboration, and constrained access to internal system processes. These conditions hinder fraud detection and reduce accountability. The paper argues for a shift in audit methodology-from outcome-based checks to a more diagnostic approach focused on identifying systemic vulnerabilities. Ultimately, the work lays a foundation for future empirical research and audit innovation in a rapidly evolving AI governance landscape.

Related papers

• SAFE-QAQ: End-to-End Slow-Thinking Audio-Text Fraud Detection via Reinforcement Learning [52.29460857893198]
  Existing fraud detection methods rely on transcribed text, suffering from ASR errors and missing crucial acoustic cues like vocal tone and environmental context.<n>We propose SAFE-QAQ, an end-to-end comprehensive framework for audio-based slow-thinking fraud detection.<n>Our framework introduces a dynamic risk assessment framework during live calls, enabling early detection and prevention of fraud.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-04T06:09:07Z)
• AI Deception: Risks, Dynamics, and Controls [153.71048309527225]
  This project provides a comprehensive and up-to-date overview of the AI deception field.<n>We identify a formal definition of AI deception, grounded in signaling theory from studies of animal deception.<n>We organize the landscape of AI deception research as a deception cycle, consisting of two key components: deception emergence and deception treatment.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-11-27T16:56:04Z)
• Adoption of AI-Driven Fraud Detection System in the Nigerian Banking Sector: An Analysis of Cost, Compliance, and Competency [0.0]
  This study investigates extent of adoption and determinants of AI-driven fraud detection systems in Nigerian banks.<n>The population of the study consist of 24 licensed banks in Nigeria.<n>Results showed that top management support, IT infrastructure, regulatory compliance, staff competency and perceived effectiveness accelerate the uptake of AI-driven fraud detection systems adoption.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-28T21:30:20Z)
• Never Compromise to Vulnerabilities: A Comprehensive Survey on AI Governance [211.5823259429128]
  We propose a comprehensive framework integrating technical and societal dimensions, structured around three interconnected pillars: Intrinsic Security, Derivative Security, and Social Ethics.<n>We identify three core challenges: (1) the generalization gap, where defenses fail against evolving threats; (2) inadequate evaluation protocols that overlook real-world risks; and (3) fragmented regulations leading to inconsistent oversight.<n>Our framework offers actionable guidance for researchers, engineers, and policymakers to develop AI systems that are not only robust and secure but also ethically aligned and publicly trustworthy.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-08-12T09:42:56Z)
• Does Machine Unlearning Truly Remove Knowledge? [80.83986295685128]
  We introduce a comprehensive auditing framework for unlearning evaluation comprising three benchmark datasets, six unlearning algorithms, and five prompt-based auditing methods.<n>We evaluate the effectiveness and robustness of different unlearning strategies.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-29T09:19:07Z)
• Application of AI-based Models for Online Fraud Detection and Analysis [1.764243259740255]
  We conduct a Systematic Literature Review on AI and NLP techniques for online fraud detection.<n>We report the state-of-the-art NLP techniques for analysing various online fraud categories.<n>We identify issues in data limitations, training bias reporting, and selective presentation of metrics in model performance reporting.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-09-25T14:47:03Z)
• Aiding Humans in Financial Fraud Decision Making: Toward an XAI-Visualization Framework [6.040452803295326]
  Financial fraud investigators face the challenge of manually synthesizing vast amounts of unstructured information. Current Visual Analytics systems primarily support isolated aspects of this process. We propose a framework where the VA system supports decision makers throughout all stages of financial fraud investigation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-26T18:10:07Z)
• Auditing of AI: Legal, Ethical and Technical Approaches [0.0]
  AI auditing is a rapidly growing field of research and practice. Different approaches to AI auditing have different affordances and constraints. The next step in the evolution of auditing as an AI governance mechanism should be the interlinking of these available approaches.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-07T12:49:58Z)
• A Blueprint for Auditing Generative AI [0.9999629695552196]
  generative AI systems display emergent capabilities and are adaptable to a wide range of downstream tasks. Existing auditing procedures fail to address the governance challenges posed by generative AI systems. We propose a three-layered approach, whereby governance audits of technology providers that design and disseminate generative AI systems, model audits of generative AI systems after pre-training but prior to their release, and application audits of applications based on top of generative AI systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-07T11:56:54Z)
• Human-Centric Multimodal Machine Learning: Recent Advances and Testbed on AI-based Recruitment [66.91538273487379]
  There is a certain consensus about the need to develop AI applications with a Human-Centric approach. Human-Centric Machine Learning needs to be developed based on four main requirements: (i) utility and social good; (ii) privacy and data ownership; (iii) transparency and accountability; and (iv) fairness in AI-driven decision-making processes. We study how current multimodal algorithms based on heterogeneous sources of information are affected by sensitive elements and inner biases in the data.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-02-13T16:44:44Z)
• Bias in Multimodal AI: Testbed for Fair Automatic Recruitment [73.85525896663371]
  We study how current multimodal algorithms based on heterogeneous sources of information are affected by sensitive elements and inner biases in the data. We train automatic recruitment algorithms using a set of multimodal synthetic profiles consciously scored with gender and racial biases. Our methodology and results show how to generate fairer AI-based tools in general, and in particular fairer automated recruitment systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-04-15T15:58:05Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.