QUPER-MAn: Benchmark-Guided Target Setting for Maintainability Requirements

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2508.15512v1
• Date: Thu, 21 Aug 2025 12:38:38 GMT
• Title: QUPER-MAn: Benchmark-Guided Target Setting for Maintainability Requirements
• Authors: Markus Borg, Martin Larsson, Philip Breid, Nadim Hagatulah,
• Abstract summary: We argue that requirements engineering can address this gap by fostering discussions and setting appropriate targets in a responsible manner.<n>We propose QUPER-MAn, a maintainability adaption of the QUPER model, which was originally developed to help organizations set targets for performance requirements.
• Score: 5.033563597998587
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Maintainable source code is essential for sustainable development in any software organization. Unfortunately, many studies show that maintainability often receives less attention than its importance warrants. We argue that requirements engineering can address this gap the problem by fostering discussions and setting appropriate targets in a responsible manner. In this preliminary work, we conducted an exploratory study of industry practices related to requirements engineering for maintainability. Our findings confirm previous studies: maintainability remains a second-class quality concern. Explicit requirements often make sweeping references to coding conventions. Tools providing maintainability proxies are common but typically only used in implicit requirements related to engineering practices. To address this, we propose QUPER-MAn, a maintainability adaption of the QUPER model, which was originally developed to help organizations set targets for performance requirements. Developed using a design science approach, QUPER-MAn, integrates maintainability benchmarks and supports target setting. We posit that it can shift maintainability from an overlooked development consequence to an actively managed goal driven by informed and responsible engineering decisions.

Related papers

• BeyondSWE: Can Current Code Agent Survive Beyond Single-Repo Bug Fixing? [61.247730037229815]
  We introduce BeyondSWE, a comprehensive benchmark that broadens existing evaluations along two axes - resolution scope and knowledge scope.<n>To investigate the role of external knowledge, we develop SearchSWE, a framework that integrates deep search with coding abilities.<n>This work offers both a realistic, challenging evaluation benchmark and a flexible framework to advance research toward more capable code agents.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-03-03T17:52:01Z)
• EmboCoach-Bench: Benchmarking AI Agents on Developing Embodied Robots [68.29056647487519]
  Embodied AI is fueled by high-fidelity simulation and large-scale data collection.<n>However, this scaling capability remains bottlenecked by a reliance on labor-intensive manual oversight.<n>We introduce textscEmboCoach-Bench, a benchmark evaluating the capacity of LLM agents to autonomously engineer embodied policies.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-29T11:33:49Z)
• ABC-Bench: Benchmarking Agentic Backend Coding in Real-World Development [72.4729759618632]
  We introduce ABC-Bench, a benchmark to evaluate agentic backend coding within a realistic, executable workflow.<n>We curated 224 practical tasks spanning 8 languages and 19 frameworks from open-source repositories.<n>Our evaluation reveals that even state-of-the-art models struggle to deliver reliable performance on these holistic tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-16T08:23:52Z)
• Requirements Development and Formalization for Reliable Code Generation: A Multi-Agent Vision [45.59678433715798]
  We envision the first multi-agent framework for reliable code generation based on textscrequirements textscdevelopment and textscformalization, named textscReDeFo.<n>The core of textscReDeFo is the use of formal specifications to bridge the gap between potentially ambiguous natural language requirements and precise executable code.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-08-26T04:45:04Z)
• Explainability as a Compliance Requirement: What Regulated Industries Need from AI Tools for Design Artifact Generation [0.7874708385247352]
  We investigate the explainability gap in AI-driven design artifact generation through semistructured interviews with ten practitioners from safety-critical industries.<n>Our findings reveal that non-explainable AI outputs necessitate extensive manual validation, reduce stakeholder trust, struggle to handle domain-specific terminology, disrupt team collaboration, and introduce regulatory compliance risks.<n>This study outlines a practical roadmap for improving the transparency, reliability, and applicability of AI tools in requirements engineering.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-07-12T09:34:39Z)
• Towards a Knowledge Base of Common Sustainability Weaknesses in Green Software Development [9.521952718902973]
  In this paper, we motivate the need for the development of a standard knowledge base of commonly occurring sustainability weaknesses in code.<n>We demonstrate why existing knowledge regarding software weaknesses cannot be re-tagged "as is" to sustainability without significant due diligence.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-10T14:03:58Z)
• Causally Aligned Curriculum Learning [69.11672390876763]
  This paper studies the problem of curriculum RL through causal lenses.<n>We derive a sufficient graphical condition characterizing causally aligned source tasks.<n>We develop an efficient algorithm to generate a causally aligned curriculum.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-21T02:20:38Z)
• UOOR: Seamless and Traceable Requirements [28.579389358111115]
  The proposed solution is a requirements engineering method, called UOOR.<n>The method unifies many known requirements concepts and a few new ones in a framework entirely devised to accommodate and support seamless change throughout the project lifecycle.<n>The UOOR approach is not just a theoretical proposal but has been designed for practical use and has been applied to a significant real-world case study: Roborace.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-25T20:03:01Z)
• Leveraging Graph-RAG and Prompt Engineering to Enhance LLM-Based Automated Requirement Traceability and Compliance Checks [8.354305051472735]
  This study demonstrates that integrating a robust Graph-RAG framework with advanced prompt engineering techniques, such as Chain of Thought and Tree of Thought, can significantly enhance performance.<n>It is both costly and more complex to implement across diverse contexts, requiring careful adaptation to specific scenarios.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-12-11T18:11:39Z)
• Quality Requirements for Code: On the Untapped Potential in Maintainability Specifications [5.342931064962865]
  This position paper proposes a synergistic approach, combining code-oriented research with Requirements Engineering expertise, to create meaningful industrial impact. Preliminary findings indicate that the established QUPER model, designed for setting quality targets, does not adequately address the unique aspects of maintainability.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-01-19T17:29:12Z)
• Towards Robust Continual Learning with Bayesian Adaptive Moment Regularization [51.34904967046097]
  Continual learning seeks to overcome the challenge of catastrophic forgetting, where a model forgets previously learnt information. We introduce a novel prior-based method that better constrains parameter growth, reducing catastrophic forgetting. Results show that BAdam achieves state-of-the-art performance for prior-based methods on challenging single-headed class-incremental experiments.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-09-15T17:10:51Z)
• Goal-Conditioned Q-Learning as Knowledge Distillation [136.79415677706612]
  We explore a connection between off-policy reinforcement learning in goal-conditioned settings and knowledge distillation. We empirically show that this can improve the performance of goal-conditioned off-policy reinforcement learning when the space of goals is high-dimensional. We also show that this technique can be adapted to allow for efficient learning in the case of multiple simultaneous sparse goals.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-08-28T22:01:10Z)
• SustainBench: Benchmarks for Monitoring the Sustainable Development Goals with Machine Learning [63.192289553021816]
  Progress toward the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals has been hindered by a lack of data on key environmental and socioeconomic indicators. Recent advances in machine learning have made it possible to utilize abundant, frequently-updated, and globally available data, such as from satellites or social media. In this paper, we introduce SustainBench, a collection of 15 benchmark tasks across 7 SDGs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-11-08T18:59:04Z)
• Towards Utility-based Prioritization of Requirements in Open Source Environments [51.65930505153647]
  We show how utility-based prioritization approaches can be used to support contributors in conventional and open source Requirements Engineering scenarios. As an example, we show how dependencies can be taken into account in utility-based prioritization processes.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-02-17T09:05:54Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.