A Framework for Processing Textual Descriptions of Business Processes using a Constrained Language -- Technical Report
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2508.15799v1
- Date: Wed, 13 Aug 2025 15:08:42 GMT
- Title: A Framework for Processing Textual Descriptions of Business Processes using a Constrained Language -- Technical Report
- Authors: Andrea Burattin, Antonio Grama, Ana-Maria Sima, Andrey Rivkin, Barbara Weber,
- Abstract summary: It allows users to write process descriptions in a constrained pattern-based language.<n>The framework also leverages large language models (LLMs) to help convert unstructured descriptions into this constrained language.
- Score: 3.1882862443983604
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
- Abstract: This report explores how (potentially constrained) natural language can be used to enable non-experts to develop process models by simply describing scenarios in plain text. To this end, a framework, called BeePath, is proposed. It allows users to write process descriptions in a constrained pattern-based language, which can then be translated into formal models such as Petri nets and DECLARE. The framework also leverages large language models (LLMs) to help convert unstructured descriptions into this constrained language.
Related papers
- Executable Ontologies: Synthesizing Event Semantics with Dataflow Architecture [51.56484100374058]
We demonstrate that integrating semantic event semantics with a dataflow architecture addresses the limitations of traditional Business Process Management systems.<n>The boldsea-engine's architecture interprets semantic models as executable algorithms without compilation.<n>It enables the modification of event models at runtime ensures transparency, and seamlessly merges data and business logic within a unified semantic framework.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-09-11T18:12:46Z) - On The Landscape of Spoken Language Models: A Comprehensive Survey [144.11278973534203]
spoken language models (SLMs) act as universal speech processing systems.<n>Work in this area is very diverse, with a range of terminology and evaluation settings.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-04-11T13:40:53Z) - DeSTA: Enhancing Speech Language Models through Descriptive Speech-Text Alignment [82.86363991170546]
We propose a Descriptive Speech-Text Alignment approach that leverages speech captioning to bridge the gap between speech and text modalities.
Our model demonstrates superior performance on the Dynamic-SUPERB benchmark, particularly in generalizing to unseen tasks.
These findings highlight the potential to reshape instruction-following SLMs by incorporating descriptive rich, speech captions.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-06-27T03:52:35Z) - A Framework to Model ML Engineering Processes [1.9744907811058787]
Development of Machine Learning (ML) based systems is complex and requires multidisciplinary teams with diverse skill sets.
Current process modeling languages are not suitable for describing the development of such systems.
We introduce a framework for modeling ML-based software development processes, built around a domain-specific language.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-04-29T09:17:36Z) - CMULAB: An Open-Source Framework for Training and Deployment of Natural Language Processing Models [59.91221728187576]
This paper introduces the CMU Linguistic Linguistic Backend, an open-source framework that simplifies model deployment and continuous human-in-the-loop fine-tuning of NLP models.
CMULAB enables users to leverage the power of multilingual models to quickly adapt and extend existing tools for speech recognition, OCR, translation, and syntactic analysis to new languages.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-04-03T02:21:46Z) - Efficient Guided Generation for Large Language Models [0.21485350418225244]
We show how the problem of neural text generation can be constructively reformulated in terms of transitions between the states of a finite-state machine.
This framework leads to an efficient approach to guiding text generation with regular expressions and context-free grammars.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-07-19T01:14:49Z) - Controlled Text Generation with Natural Language Instructions [74.88938055638636]
InstructCTG is a controlled text generation framework that incorporates different constraints.
We first extract the underlying constraints of natural texts through a combination of off-the-shelf NLP tools and simple verbalizes.
By prepending natural language descriptions of the constraints and a few demonstrations, we fine-tune a pre-trained language model to incorporate various types of constraints.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-04-27T15:56:34Z) - nl2spec: Interactively Translating Unstructured Natural Language to
Temporal Logics with Large Language Models [3.1143846686797314]
We present nl2spec, a framework for applying Large Language Models (LLMs) derive formal specifications from unstructured natural language.
We introduce a new methodology to detect and resolve the inherent ambiguity of system requirements in natural language.
Users iteratively add, delete, and edit these sub-translations to amend erroneous formalizations, which is easier than manually redrafting the entire formalization.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-03-08T20:08:53Z) - Prompting Language Models for Linguistic Structure [73.11488464916668]
We present a structured prompting approach for linguistic structured prediction tasks.
We evaluate this approach on part-of-speech tagging, named entity recognition, and sentence chunking.
We find that while PLMs contain significant prior knowledge of task labels due to task leakage into the pretraining corpus, structured prompting can also retrieve linguistic structure with arbitrary labels.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-11-15T01:13:39Z) - BenchCLAMP: A Benchmark for Evaluating Language Models on Syntactic and
Semantic Parsing [55.058258437125524]
We introduce BenchCLAMP, a Benchmark to evaluate Constrained LAnguage Model Parsing.
We benchmark eight language models, including two GPT-3 variants available only through an API.
Our experiments show that encoder-decoder pretrained language models can achieve similar performance or surpass state-of-the-art methods for syntactic and semantic parsing when the model output is constrained to be valid.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-06-21T18:34:11Z) - Extracting Similar Questions From Naturally-occurring Business
Conversations [0.0]
We show that some off-the-shelf contextualized embedding models have a narrow distribution in the embedding space, and perform poorly for the task of identifying semantically similar questions in real-world English business conversations.
We describe a method that uses appropriately tuned representations and a small set of exemplars to group questions of interest to business users in a visualization that can be used for data exploration or employee coaching.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-06-03T14:13:44Z) - ANGLEr: A Next-Generation Natural Language Exploratory Framework [0.0]
The proposed design is being used for implementation of a new natural language processing framework, called ANGLEr.
The main parts of the proposed framework consist of (a) a pluggable Docker-based architecture, (b) a general data model, and (c) APIs description along with the graphical user interface.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-05-10T13:32:13Z) - Breaking Writer's Block: Low-cost Fine-tuning of Natural Language
Generation Models [62.997667081978825]
We describe a system that fine-tunes a natural language generation model for the problem of solving Writer's Block.
The proposed fine-tuning obtains excellent results, even with a small number of epochs and a total cost of USD 150.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-12-19T11:19:11Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.