PediatricsMQA: a Multi-modal Pediatrics Question Answering Benchmark
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2508.16439v3
- Date: Wed, 27 Aug 2025 08:33:44 GMT
- Title: PediatricsMQA: a Multi-modal Pediatrics Question Answering Benchmark
- Abstract summary: Large language models (LLMs) and vision-augmented LLMs (VLMs) have advanced medical informatics, diagnostics, and decision support.<n>These models exhibit systematic biases, particularly age bias, compromising their reliability and equity.<n>This bias reflects a broader imbalance in medical research, where pediatric studies receive less funding and representation.
- Score: 11.57757126151033
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
- Abstract: Large language models (LLMs) and vision-augmented LLMs (VLMs) have significantly advanced medical informatics, diagnostics, and decision support. However, these models exhibit systematic biases, particularly age bias, compromising their reliability and equity. This is evident in their poorer performance on pediatric-focused text and visual question-answering tasks. This bias reflects a broader imbalance in medical research, where pediatric studies receive less funding and representation despite the significant disease burden in children. To address these issues, a new comprehensive multi-modal pediatric question-answering benchmark, PediatricsMQA, has been introduced. It consists of 3,417 text-based multiple-choice questions (MCQs) covering 131 pediatric topics across seven developmental stages (prenatal to adolescent) and 2,067 vision-based MCQs using 634 pediatric images from 67 imaging modalities and 256 anatomical regions. The dataset was developed using a hybrid manual-automatic pipeline, incorporating peer-reviewed pediatric literature, validated question banks, existing benchmarks, and existing QA resources. Evaluating state-of-the-art open models, we find dramatic performance drops in younger cohorts, highlighting the need for age-aware methods to ensure equitable AI support in pediatric care.
Related papers
- Decoding Children's Gait Behavior [38.15651454272919]
We introduce a new problem domain for human action recognition: the analysis of children's gait behaviors from standard RGB video.<n>We specifically target the ambulatory patterns of children aged 3-17 years.<n>Despite their clinical value, current 3D sensor-based gait analysis systems are expensive, intrusive, and often impractical for young subjects.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-08-01T00:53:05Z) - Developing and evaluating a chatbot to support maternal health care [20.297280325309924]
We present a bot for maternal health in India developed through a partnership between academic researchers, a health tech company, a public health nonprofit, and a hospital.<n>The system combines (1) stage-aware triage, routing high-risk queries to expert templates, (2) hybrid retrieval over curated maternal/newborn guidelines, and (3) evidence-conditioned generation from an LLM.<n>Our core contribution is an evaluation workflow for high-stakes deployment under limited expert supervision.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-03-13T17:02:05Z) - Beyond Benchmarks of IUGC: Rethinking Requirements of Deep Learning Methods for Intrapartum Ultrasound Biometry from Fetal Ultrasound Videos [58.71502465551297]
Intrapartum Ultrasound Grand Challenge (IUGC) co-hosted with MICCAI 2024 was launched.<n>IUGC introduces a clinically oriented multi-task automatic measurement framework that integrates standard plane classification, fetal head-pubic symphysis segmentation, and biometry.<n>The challenge releases the largest multi-center intrapartum ultrasound video dataset to date, comprising 774 videos (68,106 frames) collected from three hospitals.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-02-13T13:28:22Z) - Can Large Language Models Function as Qualified Pediatricians? A Systematic Evaluation in Real-World Clinical Contexts [9.274932109971358]
With the rapid rise of large language models (LLMs) in medicine, a key question is whether they can function as competent pediatricians in real-world clinical settings.<n>We developed PEDIASBench, a systematic evaluation framework centered on a knowledge-system framework and tailored to realistic clinical environments.<n>We evaluated 12 representative models released over the past two years, including GPT-4o, Qwen3-235B-A22B, and DeepSeek-V3, covering 19 pediatric subspecialties and 211 prototypical diseases.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-11-17T13:54:00Z) - TemMed-Bench: Evaluating Temporal Medical Image Reasoning in Vision-Language Models [54.48710348910535]
Existing medical reasoning benchmarks primarily focus on analyzing a patient's condition based on an image from a single visit.<n>We introduce TemMed-Bench, the first benchmark designed for analyzing changes in patients' conditions between different clinical visits.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-09-29T17:51:26Z) - Med-RewardBench: Benchmarking Reward Models and Judges for Medical Multimodal Large Language Models [57.73472878679636]
We introduce Med-RewardBench, the first benchmark specifically designed to evaluate medical reward models and judges.<n>Med-RewardBench features a multimodal dataset spanning 13 organ systems and 8 clinical departments, with 1,026 expert-annotated cases.<n>A rigorous three-step process ensures high-quality evaluation data across six clinically critical dimensions.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-08-29T08:58:39Z) - How Far Have Medical Vision-Language Models Come? A Comprehensive Benchmarking Study [16.84832179579428]
Vision-Language Models (VLMs) trained on web-scale corpora excel at natural image tasks and are increasingly repurposed for healthcare.<n>We present a comprehensive evaluation of open-source general-purpose and medically specialised VLMs, across eight benchmarks.<n>First, large general-purpose models already match or surpass medical-specific counterparts on several benchmarks, demonstrating strong zero-shot transfer from natural to medical images.<n>Second, reasoning performance is consistently lower than understanding, highlighting a critical barrier to safe decision support.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-07-15T11:12:39Z) - MicroVQA: A Multimodal Reasoning Benchmark for Microscopy-Based Scientific Research [57.61445960384384]
MicroVQA consists of 1,042 multiple-choice questions (MCQs) curated by biology experts across diverse microscopy modalities.<n> Benchmarking on state-of-the-art MLLMs reveal a peak performance of 53%.<n>Expert analysis of chain-of-thought responses shows perception errors are the most frequent, followed by knowledge errors and then overgeneralization errors.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-03-17T17:33:10Z) - Structured Outputs Enable General-Purpose LLMs to be Medical Experts [50.02627258858336]
Large language models (LLMs) often struggle with open-ended medical questions.<n>We propose a novel approach utilizing structured medical reasoning.<n>Our approach achieves the highest Factuality Score of 85.8, surpassing fine-tuned models.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-03-05T05:24:55Z) - LLM-MedQA: Enhancing Medical Question Answering through Case Studies in Large Language Models [18.6994780408699]
Large Language Models (LLMs) face significant challenges in medical question answering.<n>We propose a novel approach incorporating similar case generation within a multi-agent medical question-answering system.<n>Our method capitalizes on the model's inherent medical knowledge and reasoning capabilities, eliminating the need for additional training data.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-12-31T19:55:45Z) - Comprehensive and Practical Evaluation of Retrieval-Augmented Generation Systems for Medical Question Answering [70.44269982045415]
Retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) has emerged as a promising approach to enhance the performance of large language models (LLMs)
We introduce Medical Retrieval-Augmented Generation Benchmark (MedRGB) that provides various supplementary elements to four medical QA datasets.
Our experimental results reveals current models' limited ability to handle noise and misinformation in the retrieved documents.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-11-14T06:19:18Z) - MediFact at MEDIQA-M3G 2024: Medical Question Answering in Dermatology with Multimodal Learning [0.0]
This paper addresses the limitations of traditional methods by proposing a weakly supervised learning approach for open-ended medical question-answering (QA)
Our system leverages readily available MEDIQA-M3G images via a VGG16-CNN-SVM model, enabling multilingual learning of informative skin condition representations.
This work advances medical QA research, paving the way for clinical decision support systems and ultimately improving healthcare delivery.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-04-27T20:03:47Z) - OmniMedVQA: A New Large-Scale Comprehensive Evaluation Benchmark for Medical LVLM [48.16696073640864]
We introduce OmniMedVQA, a novel comprehensive medical Visual Question Answering (VQA) benchmark.
All images in this benchmark are sourced from authentic medical scenarios.
We have found that existing LVLMs struggle to address these medical VQA problems effectively.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-02-14T13:51:56Z) - Med-Flamingo: a Multimodal Medical Few-shot Learner [58.85676013818811]
We propose Med-Flamingo, a multimodal few-shot learner adapted to the medical domain.
Based on OpenFlamingo-9B, we continue pre-training on paired and interleaved medical image-text data from publications and textbooks.
We conduct the first human evaluation for generative medical VQA where physicians review the problems and blinded generations in an interactive app.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-07-27T20:36:02Z) - PMC-VQA: Visual Instruction Tuning for Medical Visual Question Answering [56.25766322554655]
Medical Visual Question Answering (MedVQA) presents a significant opportunity to enhance diagnostic accuracy and healthcare delivery.
We propose a generative-based model for medical visual understanding by aligning visual information from a pre-trained vision encoder with a large language model.
We train the proposed model on PMC-VQA and then fine-tune it on multiple public benchmarks, e.g., VQA-RAD, SLAKE, and Image-Clef 2019.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-05-17T17:50:16Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.