Evolutionary Brain-Body Co-Optimization Consistently Fails to Select for Morphological Potential

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2508.17464v1
• Date: Sun, 24 Aug 2025 17:47:07 GMT
• Title: Evolutionary Brain-Body Co-Optimization Consistently Fails to Select for Morphological Potential
• Authors: Alican Mertan, Nick Cheney,
• Abstract summary: We propose exhaustively mapping a morphology-fitness landscape to study brain-body co-optimization.<n>We analyze how evolutionary brain-body co-optimization algorithms work in this design space.
• Score: 0.32944203974612035
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Brain-body co-optimization remains a challenging problem, despite increasing interest from the community in recent years. To understand and overcome the challenges, we propose exhaustively mapping a morphology-fitness landscape to study it. To this end, we train controllers for each feasible morphology in a design space of 1,305,840 distinct morphologies, constrained by a computational budget. First, we show that this design space constitutes a good model for studying the brain-body co-optimization problem, and our attempt to exhaustively map it roughly captures the landscape. We then proceed to analyze how evolutionary brain-body co-optimization algorithms work in this design space. The complete knowledge of the morphology-fitness landscape facilitates a better understanding of the results of evolutionary brain-body co-optimization algorithms and how they unfold over evolutionary time in the morphology space. This investigation shows that the experimented algorithms cannot consistently find near-optimal solutions. The search, at times, gets stuck on morphologies that are sometimes one mutation away from better morphologies, and the algorithms cannot efficiently track the fitness gradient in the morphology-fitness landscape. We provide evidence that experimented algorithms regularly undervalue the fitness of individuals with newly mutated bodies and, as a result, eliminate promising morphologies throughout evolution. Our work provides the most concrete demonstration of the challenges of evolutionary brain-body co-optimization. Our findings ground the trends in the literature and provide valuable insights for future work.

Related papers

• Investigating Premature Convergence in Co-optimization of Morphology and Control in Evolved Virtual Soft Robots [0.2900810893770134]
  Co-optimization of morphology and control of evolved virtual soft robots is a challenging problem. We show that high-performing regions in the morphology space are not able to be discovered during the co-optimization of the morphology and control. We propose a new body-centric framework to think about the co-optimization problem.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-14T15:21:17Z)
• MorphGrower: A Synchronized Layer-by-layer Growing Approach for Plausible Neuronal Morphology Generation [38.87351909710185]
  This paper proposes MorphGrower, which mimicks the neuron natural growth mechanism for generation. MorphGrower generates morphologies layer by layer, with each subsequent layer conditioned on the previously generated structure. Results on four real-world datasets demonstrate that MorphGrower outperforms MorphVAE by a notable margin.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-01-17T09:03:14Z)
• Phylogeny-informed fitness estimation [58.720142291102135]
  We propose phylogeny-informed fitness estimation, which exploits a population's phylogeny to estimate fitness evaluations. Our results indicate that phylogeny-informed fitness estimation can mitigate the drawbacks of down-sampled lexicase. This work serves as an initial step toward improving evolutionary algorithms by exploiting runtime phylogenetic analysis.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-06T19:05:01Z)
• Automated Design of Salient Object Detection Algorithms with Brain Programming [3.518016233072556]
  This research work proposes expanding the artificial dorsal stream using a recent proposal to solve salient object detection problems. We decided to apply the fusion of visual saliency and image segmentation algorithms as a template. We present results on a benchmark designed by experts with outstanding results in comparison with the state-of-the-art.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-04-07T20:21:30Z)
• Physical Gradients for Deep Learning [101.36788327318669]
  We find that state-of-the-art training techniques are not well-suited to many problems that involve physical processes. We propose a novel hybrid training approach that combines higher-order optimization methods with machine learning techniques.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-09-30T12:14:31Z)
• Task-Agnostic Morphology Evolution [94.97384298872286]
  Current approaches that co-adapt morphology and behavior use a specific task's reward as a signal for morphology optimization. This often requires expensive policy optimization and results in task-dependent morphologies that are not built to generalize. We propose a new approach, Task-Agnostic Morphology Evolution (TAME), to alleviate both of these issues.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-02-25T18:59:21Z)
• Embodied Intelligence via Learning and Evolution [92.26791530545479]
  We show that environmental complexity fosters the evolution of morphological intelligence. We also show that evolution rapidly selects morphologies that learn faster. Our experiments suggest a mechanistic basis for both the Baldwin effect and the emergence of morphological intelligence.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-02-03T18:58:31Z)
• Emergent Hand Morphology and Control from Optimizing Robust Grasps of Diverse Objects [63.89096733478149]
  We introduce a data-driven approach where effective hand designs naturally emerge for the purpose of grasping diverse objects. We develop a novel Bayesian Optimization algorithm that efficiently co-designs the morphology and grasping skills jointly. We demonstrate the effectiveness of our approach in discovering robust and cost-efficient hand morphologies for grasping novel objects.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-12-22T17:52:29Z)
• AdaLead: A simple and robust adaptive greedy search algorithm for sequence design [55.41644538483948]
  We develop an easy-to-directed, scalable, and robust evolutionary greedy algorithm (AdaLead) AdaLead is a remarkably strong benchmark that out-competes more complex state of the art approaches in a variety of biologically motivated sequence design challenges.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-10-05T16:40:38Z)
• A Study of Fitness Landscapes for Neuroevolution [4.930887920982693]
  We use fitness landscapes to study the dynamics of meta-heuristics. We also use them to infer useful information about the predictive ability of the method. The results show that these measures are appropriate for estimating both the optimization power and the generalization ability of the considered neuroevolution configurations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-01-30T11:53:55Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.