A Novel Framework for Uncertainty Quantification via Proper Scores for Classification and Beyond

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2508.18001v1
• Date: Mon, 25 Aug 2025 13:11:03 GMT
• Title: A Novel Framework for Uncertainty Quantification via Proper Scores for Classification and Beyond
• Authors: Sebastian G. Gruber,
• Abstract summary: We propose a novel framework for uncertainty quantification in machine learning, which is based on proper scores.<n>Specifically, we use the kernel score, a kernel-based proper score, for evaluating sample-based generative models.<n>We generalize the calibration-sharpness decomposition beyond classification, which motivates the definition of proper calibration errors.
• Score: 1.5229257192293202
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: In this PhD thesis, we propose a novel framework for uncertainty quantification in machine learning, which is based on proper scores. Uncertainty quantification is an important cornerstone for trustworthy and reliable machine learning applications in practice. Usually, approaches to uncertainty quantification are problem-specific, and solutions and insights cannot be readily transferred from one task to another. Proper scores are loss functions minimized by predicting the target distribution. Due to their very general definition, proper scores apply to regression, classification, or even generative modeling tasks. We contribute several theoretical results, that connect epistemic uncertainty, aleatoric uncertainty, and model calibration with proper scores, resulting in a general and widely applicable framework. We achieve this by introducing a general bias-variance decomposition for strictly proper scores via functional Bregman divergences. Specifically, we use the kernel score, a kernel-based proper score, for evaluating sample-based generative models in various domains, like image, audio, and natural language generation. This includes a novel approach for uncertainty estimation of large language models, which outperforms state-of-the-art baselines. Further, we generalize the calibration-sharpness decomposition beyond classification, which motivates the definition of proper calibration errors. We then introduce a novel estimator for proper calibration errors in classification, and a novel risk-based approach to compare different estimators for squared calibration errors. Last, we offer a decomposition of the kernel spherical score, another kernel-based proper score, allowing a more fine-grained and interpretable evaluation of generative image models.

Related papers

• Nonparametric Distribution Regression Re-calibration [3.0204520109309847]
  Minimizing overall prediction error encourages models to prioritize informativeness over calibration.<n>In safety-critical settings, trustworthy uncertainty estimates are often more valuable than narrow intervals.<n>We propose a novel non-parametric re-calibration algorithm based on conditional kernel mean embeddings.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-13T11:48:43Z)
• What Does It Take to Build a Performant Selective Classifier? [30.90225954725644]
  Bayes noise, approximation error, ranking error, statistical noise, and implementation- or shift-induced slack are studied.<n>We validate our decomposition on synthetic two-moons data and on real-world vision and language benchmarks.<n>Our results confirm that (i) Bayes noise and limited model capacity can account for substantial gaps, (ii) only richer, feature-aware calibrators meaningfully improve score ordering, and (iii) data shift introduces a separate slack that demands distributionally robust training.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-23T05:48:40Z)
• Rethinking Early Stopping: Refine, Then Calibrate [49.966899634962374]
  We present a novel variational formulation of the calibration-refinement decomposition.<n>We provide theoretical and empirical evidence that calibration and refinement errors are not minimized simultaneously during training.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-01-31T15:03:54Z)
• Probably Approximately Precision and Recall Learning [60.00180898830079]
  A key challenge in machine learning is the prevalence of one-sided feedback.<n>We introduce a Probably Approximately Correct (PAC) framework in which hypotheses are set functions that map each input to a set of labels.<n>We develop new algorithms that learn from positive data alone, achieving optimal sample complexity in the realizable case.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-20T04:21:07Z)
• Improving Predictor Reliability with Selective Recalibration [15.319277333431318]
  Recalibration is one of the most effective ways to produce reliable confidence estimates with a pre-trained model. We propose textitselective recalibration, where a selection model learns to reject some user-chosen proportion of the data. Our results show that selective recalibration consistently leads to significantly lower calibration error than a wide range of selection and recalibration baselines.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-07T18:17:31Z)
• Calibration by Distribution Matching: Trainable Kernel Calibration Metrics [56.629245030893685]
  We introduce kernel-based calibration metrics that unify and generalize popular forms of calibration for both classification and regression. These metrics admit differentiable sample estimates, making it easy to incorporate a calibration objective into empirical risk minimization. We provide intuitive mechanisms to tailor calibration metrics to a decision task, and enforce accurate loss estimation and no regret decisions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-31T06:19:40Z)
• Bridging Precision and Confidence: A Train-Time Loss for Calibrating Object Detection [58.789823426981044]
  We propose a novel auxiliary loss formulation that aims to align the class confidence of bounding boxes with the accurateness of predictions. Our results reveal that our train-time loss surpasses strong calibration baselines in reducing calibration error for both in and out-domain scenarios.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-03-25T08:56:21Z)
• Training Normalizing Flows with the Precision-Recall Divergence [73.92251251511199]
  We show that achieving a specified precision-recall trade-off corresponds to minimising -divergences from a family we call the em PR-divergences We propose a novel generative model that is able to train a normalizing flow to minimise any -divergence, and in particular, achieve a given precision-recall trade-off.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-02-01T17:46:47Z)
• Calibration tests beyond classification [30.616624345970973]
  Most supervised machine learning tasks are subject to irreducible prediction errors. Probabilistic predictive models address this limitation by providing probability distributions that represent a belief over plausible targets. Calibrated models guarantee that the predictions are neither over- nor under-confident.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-10-21T09:49:57Z)
• Calibrated Selective Classification [34.08454890436067]
  We develop a new approach to selective classification in which we propose a method for rejecting examples with "uncertain" uncertainties. We present a framework for learning selectively calibrated models, where a separate selector network is trained to improve the selective calibration error of a given base model. We demonstrate the empirical effectiveness of our approach on multiple image classification and lung cancer risk assessment tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-08-25T13:31:09Z)
• Good Classifiers are Abundant in the Interpolating Regime [64.72044662855612]
  We develop a methodology to compute precisely the full distribution of test errors among interpolating classifiers. We find that test errors tend to concentrate around a small typical value $varepsilon*$, which deviates substantially from the test error of worst-case interpolating model. Our results show that the usual style of analysis in statistical learning theory may not be fine-grained enough to capture the good generalization performance observed in practice.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-06-22T21:12:31Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.